{"title":"关于巴西土著“儿童最大利益”的争议","authors":"S. Nascimento","doi":"10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as \"removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.","PeriodicalId":30160,"journal":{"name":"Runa","volume":"40 1","pages":"185-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controvérsias em torno do “melhor interesse da criança” indígena no Brasil\",\"authors\":\"S. Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as \\\"removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Runa\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"185-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Runa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Runa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自2017年最后几个月以来,我在巴西南马托格罗索州参加了一个民间社会团体,该团体旨在支持Elida de Oliveira,他声称有权与他的Kaiowa儿子一起生活,自2015年以来,Kaiowa一直在杜拉多斯市的一家机构护理。为了阐明被媒体谴责为“将土著儿童从家庭中带走”,我提出了一个案例,其中一位未经公共卫生程序的母亲对亲生母亲的怀疑被用作保护系统当局将儿童带走的原因之一Guarani和Kaiowa印第安人围绕着这场辩论,考虑到他们所处的历史和社会背景。
Controvérsias em torno do “melhor interesse da criança” indígena no Brasil
Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as "removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.