关于巴西土著“儿童最大利益”的争议

Runa Pub Date : 2019-11-11 DOI:10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270
S. Nascimento
{"title":"关于巴西土著“儿童最大利益”的争议","authors":"S. Nascimento","doi":"10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as \"removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.","PeriodicalId":30160,"journal":{"name":"Runa","volume":"40 1","pages":"185-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controvérsias em torno do “melhor interesse da criança” indígena no Brasil\",\"authors\":\"S. Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as \\\"removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Runa\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"185-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Runa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Runa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/RUNA.V40I2.6270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2017年最后几个月以来,我在巴西南马托格罗索州参加了一个民间社会团体,该团体旨在支持Elida de Oliveira,他声称有权与他的Kaiowa儿子一起生活,自2015年以来,Kaiowa一直在杜拉多斯市的一家机构护理。为了阐明被媒体谴责为“将土著儿童从家庭中带走”,我提出了一个案例,其中一位未经公共卫生程序的母亲对亲生母亲的怀疑被用作保护系统当局将儿童带走的原因之一Guarani和Kaiowa印第安人围绕着这场辩论,考虑到他们所处的历史和社会背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controvérsias em torno do “melhor interesse da criança” indígena no Brasil
Since last months of 2017, I participated in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in a civil society group organized to support Elida de Oliveira who claims the right to live with his Kaiowa son, who is in an institutional care in the municipality of Dourados since 2015. In order to elucidate what has been denounced by the press as "removal of indigenous children” from their families, I present a case where suspicions about biological maternity from a mother who has not undergone public health procedures, are being used as one of the reasons for the removal of children by authorities of the Protection System. Starting from the political mobilization around the case, I draw attention to the heterogeneous participation of the Guarani and Kaiowa Indians around this debate, considering the historical and social context in which they are.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
BAJO SOSPECHA. Debates urgentes sobre las clases trabajadoras en la Argentina Geração, um conceito situado Pichikeche en recuperaciones territoriales Antropólogos y Agentes institucionales Política cultural y género, un acercamiento a partir de dos casos en América Latina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1