公共政策成功实施的关键因素分析:斯洛文尼亚的定性研究

Q2 Social Sciences Danube Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2478/danb-2020-0007
Ž. Kotnik, Lan Umek, P. Kovač, D. Stanimirović, Mirko Vintar
{"title":"公共政策成功实施的关键因素分析:斯洛文尼亚的定性研究","authors":"Ž. Kotnik, Lan Umek, P. Kovač, D. Stanimirović, Mirko Vintar","doi":"10.2478/danb-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyses the role and significance of the selected factors for the successful design and implementation of public policies in Slovenia and more broadly. Based on structured interviews and content analysis of the responses, we investigated the impact of predefined factors (i.e. strategic, institutional, normative, economic/financial, methodological/procedural, organisational/human resources/ICT support factors). The aim of the article is to analyse the case of Slovenia, to identify which factors contribute most to the successful design and implementation of public policies, and to provide a basis for comparison with similar countries or systems. The research findings imply several conclusions, particularly strategic factors, which have been identified as the most essential. The other findings are related to the lack of evaluation practice, the discontinuity of and early changes in government, which affect all aspects of policy execution and lead to poor intersectoral collaboration as well as insufficient and ineffective public debate. Not surprisingly, all of the identified hindrances are featured in the pertinent theories as necessary democratic dimensions of contemporary public governance. Contrary to the national context, the EU influence seems to expedite policymaking processes and contribute to the consistency of policies.","PeriodicalId":38400,"journal":{"name":"Danube","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Key Factors for Successful Public Policy Implementation: A Qualitative Study in Slovenia\",\"authors\":\"Ž. Kotnik, Lan Umek, P. Kovač, D. Stanimirović, Mirko Vintar\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/danb-2020-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper analyses the role and significance of the selected factors for the successful design and implementation of public policies in Slovenia and more broadly. Based on structured interviews and content analysis of the responses, we investigated the impact of predefined factors (i.e. strategic, institutional, normative, economic/financial, methodological/procedural, organisational/human resources/ICT support factors). The aim of the article is to analyse the case of Slovenia, to identify which factors contribute most to the successful design and implementation of public policies, and to provide a basis for comparison with similar countries or systems. The research findings imply several conclusions, particularly strategic factors, which have been identified as the most essential. The other findings are related to the lack of evaluation practice, the discontinuity of and early changes in government, which affect all aspects of policy execution and lead to poor intersectoral collaboration as well as insufficient and ineffective public debate. Not surprisingly, all of the identified hindrances are featured in the pertinent theories as necessary democratic dimensions of contemporary public governance. Contrary to the national context, the EU influence seems to expedite policymaking processes and contribute to the consistency of policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danube\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danube\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danube","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文分析了选定因素对斯洛文尼亚乃至更广泛地区成功设计和实施公共政策的作用和意义。基于结构化访谈和回复内容分析,我们调查了预定义因素(即战略、体制、规范、经济/财务、方法/程序、组织/人力资源/ICT支持因素)的影响。本文的目的是分析斯洛文尼亚的情况,确定哪些因素对公共政策的成功设计和实施贡献最大,并为与类似国家或制度进行比较提供基础。研究结果暗示了几个结论,特别是战略因素,这些因素被认为是最重要的。其他调查结果与缺乏评估实践、政府的不连续性和早期变革有关,这影响了政策执行的各个方面,导致部门间合作不力,以及公共辩论不足和无效。毫不奇怪,所有已确定的障碍都在相关理论中被列为当代公共治理的必要民主层面。与国家背景相反,欧盟的影响力似乎加快了政策制定过程,并有助于政策的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the Key Factors for Successful Public Policy Implementation: A Qualitative Study in Slovenia
Abstract This paper analyses the role and significance of the selected factors for the successful design and implementation of public policies in Slovenia and more broadly. Based on structured interviews and content analysis of the responses, we investigated the impact of predefined factors (i.e. strategic, institutional, normative, economic/financial, methodological/procedural, organisational/human resources/ICT support factors). The aim of the article is to analyse the case of Slovenia, to identify which factors contribute most to the successful design and implementation of public policies, and to provide a basis for comparison with similar countries or systems. The research findings imply several conclusions, particularly strategic factors, which have been identified as the most essential. The other findings are related to the lack of evaluation practice, the discontinuity of and early changes in government, which affect all aspects of policy execution and lead to poor intersectoral collaboration as well as insufficient and ineffective public debate. Not surprisingly, all of the identified hindrances are featured in the pertinent theories as necessary democratic dimensions of contemporary public governance. Contrary to the national context, the EU influence seems to expedite policymaking processes and contribute to the consistency of policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danube
Danube Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legal Gap in Refugee Protection in Non-Signatory Countries: An Evidence from Indonesia Legal Aspects of Virtual Assets Regulation in Ukraine System Management and Improvement of Payment Planning Processes in Production Engineering Does the Education of Mothers Affect Their Experience pf Motherhood and Parenthood? Selected Aspects in the Czech Republic Public Administration Effectiveness of the Agro-Trade between Ukraine and the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1