“希克蔑视者的玩笑”:托马斯·纳舍、马丁的月心与都铎戏剧传统

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1086/724358
J. Ingram
{"title":"“希克蔑视者的玩笑”:托马斯·纳舍、马丁的月心与都铎戏剧传统","authors":"J. Ingram","doi":"10.1086/724358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the origins and implications of Martin’s Month’s Mind (1589), a piece attributed to Thomas Nashe, and written as part of the Anglican establishment’s response to the Martin Marprelate pamphlets (1588–1589). It makes three related arguments. First, it highlights Nashe’s engagement with strategies of early Tudor drama in writing this polemical prose work, such as allegorical purgation of evil, vice antics, the deathbed confession, and the mock testament. Second, it draws connections between this pamphlet and theater companies and their patrons to which it alludes, examining the role of theater as a political weapon to expose faction and to attack patrons of political opponents. It explores what it was meant to achieve and to whom and under what circumstances it created a proto-public sphere. Finally, it shows the power of drama to insert itself into a late sixteenth-century pamphlet war, where earlier Tudor polemical dramatic conventions worked as powerful tools, instruments known for their effective management of political causes. With those dramatic appropriations, Martin’s Month’s Mind made a case for publicly canvassed argument, offering its audience a sense of political awareness and of their own authority as questioning and engaged citizens. [J.I.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Hick scorners jestes”: Thomas Nashe, Martin’s Month’s Mind, and the Tudor Dramatic Tradition\",\"authors\":\"J. Ingram\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay examines the origins and implications of Martin’s Month’s Mind (1589), a piece attributed to Thomas Nashe, and written as part of the Anglican establishment’s response to the Martin Marprelate pamphlets (1588–1589). It makes three related arguments. First, it highlights Nashe’s engagement with strategies of early Tudor drama in writing this polemical prose work, such as allegorical purgation of evil, vice antics, the deathbed confession, and the mock testament. Second, it draws connections between this pamphlet and theater companies and their patrons to which it alludes, examining the role of theater as a political weapon to expose faction and to attack patrons of political opponents. It explores what it was meant to achieve and to whom and under what circumstances it created a proto-public sphere. Finally, it shows the power of drama to insert itself into a late sixteenth-century pamphlet war, where earlier Tudor polemical dramatic conventions worked as powerful tools, instruments known for their effective management of political causes. With those dramatic appropriations, Martin’s Month’s Mind made a case for publicly canvassed argument, offering its audience a sense of political awareness and of their own authority as questioning and engaged citizens. [J.I.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724358\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了托马斯·纳舍(Thomas Nashe)的《马丁的月心》(1589)的起源和含义,这篇文章是英国圣公会对马丁·马普雷特(Martin Marprelate)小册子(1588-1589)的回应之一。它提出了三个相关的论点。首先,它强调了纳舍在写这部充满争议的散文作品时对都铎早期戏剧策略的参与,如寓言式的邪恶清洗、邪恶的滑稽动作、临终忏悔和模拟遗嘱。其次,它将这本小册子与剧院公司及其赞助人联系起来,考察了剧院作为揭露派系和攻击政治对手赞助人的政治武器的作用。它探索了它的目的是实现什么,以及在什么情况下为谁创造了一个原始的公共领域。最后,它展示了戏剧的力量,将其插入到16世纪末的小册子战争中,在这场战争中,早期都铎王朝的辩论戏剧惯例是强有力的工具,以其对政治事业的有效管理而闻名。凭借这些戏剧性的拨款,《马丁的月心》为公开游说的论点提供了理由,为观众提供了一种政治意识,以及他们作为质疑和参与公民的权威感。[J.I.]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Hick scorners jestes”: Thomas Nashe, Martin’s Month’s Mind, and the Tudor Dramatic Tradition
This essay examines the origins and implications of Martin’s Month’s Mind (1589), a piece attributed to Thomas Nashe, and written as part of the Anglican establishment’s response to the Martin Marprelate pamphlets (1588–1589). It makes three related arguments. First, it highlights Nashe’s engagement with strategies of early Tudor drama in writing this polemical prose work, such as allegorical purgation of evil, vice antics, the deathbed confession, and the mock testament. Second, it draws connections between this pamphlet and theater companies and their patrons to which it alludes, examining the role of theater as a political weapon to expose faction and to attack patrons of political opponents. It explores what it was meant to achieve and to whom and under what circumstances it created a proto-public sphere. Finally, it shows the power of drama to insert itself into a late sixteenth-century pamphlet war, where earlier Tudor polemical dramatic conventions worked as powerful tools, instruments known for their effective management of political causes. With those dramatic appropriations, Martin’s Month’s Mind made a case for publicly canvassed argument, offering its audience a sense of political awareness and of their own authority as questioning and engaged citizens. [J.I.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1