{"title":"弗里德里希·拉泽尔,《法国地理和社会科学》(1890-1918)——中心性和距离","authors":"Marie-Claire Robic","doi":"10.5194/gh-78-157-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The reception of Ratzel at the turn of the 20th century\ncoincides with the rise of an academic geography supported by the republican\nregime and the internationally leading reputation of German geography. But,\nsince the defeat of 1870, French science was driven by the “German\nchallenge”, and the promotion of the social sciences fuelled competition\nbetween specialists. Ratzel's reception is characterised by its size, the\nnotoriety of the reviewers and the variety of disciplines concerned.\nAnalysis of the uses and especially of the modes of translation and\ndisciplinary labelling reveals both the ambivalences of the criticism\nagainst Ratzel and the contrasting strategies mobilized, according to\nwhether it is a question of founding a modern geography, writing a national\ngeography, or imposing sociology as the master science. Positions then\nradicalise, accentuating criticism of a science in tune with the Reich's\npolitics and culminating in wartime with the resemantization of the notion\nof Raum.\n","PeriodicalId":35649,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Friedrich Ratzel, géographie et sciences sociales en France (1890–1918) – Centralité et distanciations\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Claire Robic\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gh-78-157-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The reception of Ratzel at the turn of the 20th century\\ncoincides with the rise of an academic geography supported by the republican\\nregime and the internationally leading reputation of German geography. But,\\nsince the defeat of 1870, French science was driven by the “German\\nchallenge”, and the promotion of the social sciences fuelled competition\\nbetween specialists. Ratzel's reception is characterised by its size, the\\nnotoriety of the reviewers and the variety of disciplines concerned.\\nAnalysis of the uses and especially of the modes of translation and\\ndisciplinary labelling reveals both the ambivalences of the criticism\\nagainst Ratzel and the contrasting strategies mobilized, according to\\nwhether it is a question of founding a modern geography, writing a national\\ngeography, or imposing sociology as the master science. Positions then\\nradicalise, accentuating criticism of a science in tune with the Reich's\\npolitics and culminating in wartime with the resemantization of the notion\\nof Raum.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-157-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-157-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Friedrich Ratzel, géographie et sciences sociales en France (1890–1918) – Centralité et distanciations
Abstract. The reception of Ratzel at the turn of the 20th century
coincides with the rise of an academic geography supported by the republican
regime and the internationally leading reputation of German geography. But,
since the defeat of 1870, French science was driven by the “German
challenge”, and the promotion of the social sciences fuelled competition
between specialists. Ratzel's reception is characterised by its size, the
notoriety of the reviewers and the variety of disciplines concerned.
Analysis of the uses and especially of the modes of translation and
disciplinary labelling reveals both the ambivalences of the criticism
against Ratzel and the contrasting strategies mobilized, according to
whether it is a question of founding a modern geography, writing a national
geography, or imposing sociology as the master science. Positions then
radicalise, accentuating criticism of a science in tune with the Reich's
politics and culminating in wartime with the resemantization of the notion
of Raum.
期刊介绍:
Geographica Helvetica, the Swiss journal of geography, publishes contributions in all fields of geography as well as in related neighbouring disciplines. It is a multi-lingual journal, accepting articles in the three main Swiss languages, German, French, and Italian, as well as in English. It invites theoretical as well as empirical contributions. The journal welcomes contributions that specifically deal with empirical questions relating to Switzerland. The agenda of Geographica Helvetica is related to the specificity of Swiss geography as a meeting ground for different geographical traditions and languages (German, French, Italian and, more recently, a type of transnational, mainly English-speaking geography). The journal aims to become an ideal platform for the development of an informed, creative, and truly cosmopolitan geography. The journal will therefore provide space for cross-border theoretical debates around major thinkers – past and present – and the circulation of geographical ideas and concepts across Europe and beyond. The journal seeks to be a platform of debate also through innovative publication formats in its section "Interfaces", which publishes shorter interventions: reflection pieces on major thinkers as well as position papers (see manuscript types). Geographica Helvetica is promoted and supported by the following institutions: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Geographic and Ethnological Society of Zurich/Geographisch-Ethnographische Gesellschaft Zürich (GEGZ), and Swiss Association of Geography/Association Suisse de Géographie (ASG).