{"title":"对大型创伤中心2级重症监护要求的服务评估","authors":"P. Galea, K. Joyce, Sarah Galea, F. Loughnane","doi":"10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical care provision is fundamental in all developed health systems\nin which severe disease and injury is managed. This is especially true\nin major trauma centres and high-acuity establishments, where acutely\nunstable patients can be admitted at any time, requiring clinical\nmonitoring and interventions appropriate for their burden of illness.\nThis single-centre, prospective service evaluation applied validated\nscoring systems to a surgical population, sampling and following those\nconsidered “high-risk” through to discharge or death, alongside all\nintensive care unit (ICU) admissions during 2019. Primarily we aimed to\nquantify the number of patients objectively suitable for Level 2\ncritical care, conventionally provided in a high-dependency unit (HDU)\nsetting. Secondary outcome measures included ICU readmission rate,\nin-hospital mortality, and delays to ICU admission and discharge. Of the\n“high-risk” surgical patients, more than eight per week were found to\nhave peri-operative Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity\nScore for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores\nthat would advocate critical care admission. Only one individual\nreceived scheduled peri-operative critical care. Post-operative\nmortality in this group was 6.1%, though none of these patients was\nadmitted to ICU prior to death. There were 605 ICU admissions in 2019,\nwith 32.1% of admitted days spent at the equivalent of Level 2 critical\ncare, which could have been administered in a HDU if one was available.\nThe ICU readmission rate was 6.45%. This data demonstrates substantial\nunmet critical care needs, with patients not uncommonly managed in\nclinically inappropriate areas for extended periods due to delays\naccessing ICU. A designated HDU may mitigate clinical risk from this\nsubgroup, reducing morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and this\nmethodology for assessing requirements could be used in other similar\ninstitutions.","PeriodicalId":73881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A service evaluation examining the requirement for Level 2 critical care in a major trauma centre\",\"authors\":\"P. Galea, K. Joyce, Sarah Galea, F. Loughnane\",\"doi\":\"10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical care provision is fundamental in all developed health systems\\nin which severe disease and injury is managed. This is especially true\\nin major trauma centres and high-acuity establishments, where acutely\\nunstable patients can be admitted at any time, requiring clinical\\nmonitoring and interventions appropriate for their burden of illness.\\nThis single-centre, prospective service evaluation applied validated\\nscoring systems to a surgical population, sampling and following those\\nconsidered “high-risk” through to discharge or death, alongside all\\nintensive care unit (ICU) admissions during 2019. Primarily we aimed to\\nquantify the number of patients objectively suitable for Level 2\\ncritical care, conventionally provided in a high-dependency unit (HDU)\\nsetting. Secondary outcome measures included ICU readmission rate,\\nin-hospital mortality, and delays to ICU admission and discharge. Of the\\n“high-risk” surgical patients, more than eight per week were found to\\nhave peri-operative Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity\\nScore for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores\\nthat would advocate critical care admission. Only one individual\\nreceived scheduled peri-operative critical care. Post-operative\\nmortality in this group was 6.1%, though none of these patients was\\nadmitted to ICU prior to death. There were 605 ICU admissions in 2019,\\nwith 32.1% of admitted days spent at the equivalent of Level 2 critical\\ncare, which could have been administered in a HDU if one was available.\\nThe ICU readmission rate was 6.45%. This data demonstrates substantial\\nunmet critical care needs, with patients not uncommonly managed in\\nclinically inappropriate areas for extended periods due to delays\\naccessing ICU. A designated HDU may mitigate clinical risk from this\\nsubgroup, reducing morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and this\\nmethodology for assessing requirements could be used in other similar\\ninstitutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.164175447.73916057/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A service evaluation examining the requirement for Level 2 critical care in a major trauma centre
Critical care provision is fundamental in all developed health systems
in which severe disease and injury is managed. This is especially true
in major trauma centres and high-acuity establishments, where acutely
unstable patients can be admitted at any time, requiring clinical
monitoring and interventions appropriate for their burden of illness.
This single-centre, prospective service evaluation applied validated
scoring systems to a surgical population, sampling and following those
considered “high-risk” through to discharge or death, alongside all
intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during 2019. Primarily we aimed to
quantify the number of patients objectively suitable for Level 2
critical care, conventionally provided in a high-dependency unit (HDU)
setting. Secondary outcome measures included ICU readmission rate,
in-hospital mortality, and delays to ICU admission and discharge. Of the
“high-risk” surgical patients, more than eight per week were found to
have peri-operative Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity
Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores
that would advocate critical care admission. Only one individual
received scheduled peri-operative critical care. Post-operative
mortality in this group was 6.1%, though none of these patients was
admitted to ICU prior to death. There were 605 ICU admissions in 2019,
with 32.1% of admitted days spent at the equivalent of Level 2 critical
care, which could have been administered in a HDU if one was available.
The ICU readmission rate was 6.45%. This data demonstrates substantial
unmet critical care needs, with patients not uncommonly managed in
clinically inappropriate areas for extended periods due to delays
accessing ICU. A designated HDU may mitigate clinical risk from this
subgroup, reducing morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and this
methodology for assessing requirements could be used in other similar
institutions.