专科药师整合对匹马西林用药可及性的影响

Sabrina Livezey, R. McCormick, Nisha B. Shah, Leena Choi, Joshua DeClercq, A. Zuckerman
{"title":"专科药师整合对匹马西林用药可及性的影响","authors":"Sabrina Livezey, R. McCormick, Nisha B. Shah, Leena Choi, Joshua DeClercq, A. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Patient access to pimavanserin treatment, an antipsychotic agent used to treat Parkinson’s disease-related psychosis, is limited by insurance approval and navigating a limited distribution network. Once initiated, safety and efficacy monitoring is needed to ensure adherence and clinical benefit. Aims: To determine the impact of specialty pharmacist integration on time to pimavanserin access. A secondary objective is to describe pharmacist interventions related to pimavanserin. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study with a pre–post design. Patients prescribed pimavanserin through the center’s neurology clinic during May 2016 through July 2018 were included. An electronic chart review was performed to collect data for patient demographics (age, race, gender), insurance information (type, prior authorization process), and pharmacist interventions. The primary outcome was defined as time to medication access (in days) between the initial intent to treat and insurance approval. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed to assess the associations between medication access time and pharmacist integration. Results: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were mostly male (80%) and Caucasian (96%). Median age was 74 years. Baseline demographics between the pre- and post-integration cohorts were similar. Pre-integration, 33 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 82% attaining insurance approval and 79% starting therapy. Post-integration, 61 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 95% attaining insurance approval and 93% starting therapy. Median time to access decreased following integration (3 days compared to 24.5 days). Patients prescribed pimavanserin pre-integration had a 23-fold increase in odds of experiencing a longer time to access compared to post-integration (OR = 23; 95% CI = 8–69; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to have a shorter medication access time compared to patients with commercial insurance. The pharmacist performed at least one intervention for 85% of patients, including medication counseling (n = 58) and interventions to improve clinical care (n = 120) and medication access (n = 135). Conclusions: Integration of a specialty pharmacist decreased time to pimavanserin access and facilitated pharmacy interventions to ensure safety and efficacy of use. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of faster medication access on clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"8 1","pages":"29 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of specialty pharmacist integration on time to medication access for pimavanserin\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Livezey, R. McCormick, Nisha B. Shah, Leena Choi, Joshua DeClercq, A. Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Patient access to pimavanserin treatment, an antipsychotic agent used to treat Parkinson’s disease-related psychosis, is limited by insurance approval and navigating a limited distribution network. Once initiated, safety and efficacy monitoring is needed to ensure adherence and clinical benefit. Aims: To determine the impact of specialty pharmacist integration on time to pimavanserin access. A secondary objective is to describe pharmacist interventions related to pimavanserin. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study with a pre–post design. Patients prescribed pimavanserin through the center’s neurology clinic during May 2016 through July 2018 were included. An electronic chart review was performed to collect data for patient demographics (age, race, gender), insurance information (type, prior authorization process), and pharmacist interventions. The primary outcome was defined as time to medication access (in days) between the initial intent to treat and insurance approval. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed to assess the associations between medication access time and pharmacist integration. Results: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were mostly male (80%) and Caucasian (96%). Median age was 74 years. Baseline demographics between the pre- and post-integration cohorts were similar. Pre-integration, 33 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 82% attaining insurance approval and 79% starting therapy. Post-integration, 61 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 95% attaining insurance approval and 93% starting therapy. Median time to access decreased following integration (3 days compared to 24.5 days). Patients prescribed pimavanserin pre-integration had a 23-fold increase in odds of experiencing a longer time to access compared to post-integration (OR = 23; 95% CI = 8–69; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to have a shorter medication access time compared to patients with commercial insurance. The pharmacist performed at least one intervention for 85% of patients, including medication counseling (n = 58) and interventions to improve clinical care (n = 120) and medication access (n = 135). Conclusions: Integration of a specialty pharmacist decreased time to pimavanserin access and facilitated pharmacy interventions to ensure safety and efficacy of use. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of faster medication access on clinical outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:匹马万色林是一种用于治疗帕金森病相关精神病的抗精神病药物,患者获得匹马万色林治疗受到保险批准和有限分销网络的限制。一旦启动,需要进行安全性和有效性监测,以确保依从性和临床获益。目的:探讨专业药师整合对匹马西林及时获取的影响。第二个目标是描述与匹马西林相关的药剂师干预措施。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,采用前后设计。包括2016年5月至2018年7月期间通过该中心神经病学诊所处方匹马万塞林的患者。进行电子图表回顾,收集患者人口统计(年龄、种族、性别)、保险信息(类型、事先授权程序)和药剂师干预措施的数据。主要结局被定义为从最初的治疗意图到保险批准之间获得药物的时间(以天为单位)。采用单因素分析和多元逻辑回归评估用药可及时间与药师整合的关系。结果:94例患者符合纳入标准。患者以男性(80%)和白人(96%)居多。中位年龄为74岁。整合前和整合后队列的基线人口统计数据相似。整合前,33名患者开了匹马瑟林,82%获得保险批准,79%开始治疗。整合后,61例患者处方匹马万塞林,95%获得保险批准,93%开始治疗。中位就诊时间在整合后减少(3天相比于24.5天)。与整合后相比,处方匹马万塞林的患者经历更长的就诊时间的几率增加了23倍(OR = 23;95% ci = 8-69;p < 0.001)。此外,与商业保险患者相比,非商业保险患者更有可能有更短的药物获取时间。药剂师对85%的患者至少进行了一项干预,包括药物咨询(n = 58)和改善临床护理(n = 120)和药物获取(n = 135)的干预。结论:专业药师的整合缩短了获得匹马西林的时间,促进了药学干预,确保了使用的安全性和有效性。需要进一步的研究来评估更快获得药物对临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of specialty pharmacist integration on time to medication access for pimavanserin
Abstract Background: Patient access to pimavanserin treatment, an antipsychotic agent used to treat Parkinson’s disease-related psychosis, is limited by insurance approval and navigating a limited distribution network. Once initiated, safety and efficacy monitoring is needed to ensure adherence and clinical benefit. Aims: To determine the impact of specialty pharmacist integration on time to pimavanserin access. A secondary objective is to describe pharmacist interventions related to pimavanserin. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study with a pre–post design. Patients prescribed pimavanserin through the center’s neurology clinic during May 2016 through July 2018 were included. An electronic chart review was performed to collect data for patient demographics (age, race, gender), insurance information (type, prior authorization process), and pharmacist interventions. The primary outcome was defined as time to medication access (in days) between the initial intent to treat and insurance approval. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were performed to assess the associations between medication access time and pharmacist integration. Results: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were mostly male (80%) and Caucasian (96%). Median age was 74 years. Baseline demographics between the pre- and post-integration cohorts were similar. Pre-integration, 33 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 82% attaining insurance approval and 79% starting therapy. Post-integration, 61 patients were prescribed pimavanserin, with 95% attaining insurance approval and 93% starting therapy. Median time to access decreased following integration (3 days compared to 24.5 days). Patients prescribed pimavanserin pre-integration had a 23-fold increase in odds of experiencing a longer time to access compared to post-integration (OR = 23; 95% CI = 8–69; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to have a shorter medication access time compared to patients with commercial insurance. The pharmacist performed at least one intervention for 85% of patients, including medication counseling (n = 58) and interventions to improve clinical care (n = 120) and medication access (n = 135). Conclusions: Integration of a specialty pharmacist decreased time to pimavanserin access and facilitated pharmacy interventions to ensure safety and efficacy of use. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of faster medication access on clinical outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1