社交媒体的电影蓝图:比较分析

Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Pedro Mir-Bernal, A. Barrientos-Báez, Marc Perelló-Sobrepere
{"title":"社交媒体的电影蓝图:比较分析","authors":"Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Pedro Mir-Bernal, A. Barrientos-Báez, Marc Perelló-Sobrepere","doi":"10.24310/FOTOCINEMA.2021.VI22.11738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the activity of the three biggest movie studios in social media, 20h Century Fox, Warner Bros and Universal Studios, and how that is affecting in the numbers and importance of each. Through deep searches, professional advice and the use of some statistic programs, we were able to pull out some interesting assumptions that will be discussed. We have focused in different parts of each Social Media since, we think, each one is designed to fulfill one specific aspect, for example create discussions or just present a piece of work or trailer in our case. With that approach we expect to determine which of the companies has understood better the way they have to be used and if they had won any kind of advantage through the good use of this medias presented as more interaction between themselves and the viewers and a more effective way to present their products. We conclude a correlation between movie studios impact and social media in terms of posts and comments. YouTube is the main social media for movie studios companies.","PeriodicalId":40899,"journal":{"name":"Fotocinema-Revista Cientifica de Cine y Fotografia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinematic blueprint on Social Media: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, Pedro Mir-Bernal, A. Barrientos-Báez, Marc Perelló-Sobrepere\",\"doi\":\"10.24310/FOTOCINEMA.2021.VI22.11738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to analyze the activity of the three biggest movie studios in social media, 20h Century Fox, Warner Bros and Universal Studios, and how that is affecting in the numbers and importance of each. Through deep searches, professional advice and the use of some statistic programs, we were able to pull out some interesting assumptions that will be discussed. We have focused in different parts of each Social Media since, we think, each one is designed to fulfill one specific aspect, for example create discussions or just present a piece of work or trailer in our case. With that approach we expect to determine which of the companies has understood better the way they have to be used and if they had won any kind of advantage through the good use of this medias presented as more interaction between themselves and the viewers and a more effective way to present their products. We conclude a correlation between movie studios impact and social media in terms of posts and comments. YouTube is the main social media for movie studios companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fotocinema-Revista Cientifica de Cine y Fotografia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fotocinema-Revista Cientifica de Cine y Fotografia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24310/FOTOCINEMA.2021.VI22.11738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fotocinema-Revista Cientifica de Cine y Fotografia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24310/FOTOCINEMA.2021.VI22.11738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在分析社交媒体中三大电影制片厂,20世纪福克斯、华纳兄弟和环球影城的活动,以及这对它们的数量和重要性的影响。通过深入搜索、专业建议和使用一些统计程序,我们得出了一些有趣的假设,这些假设将被讨论。我们专注于每个社交媒体的不同部分,因为我们认为,每个社交媒体都是为了实现一个特定的方面,例如创建讨论,或者在我们的案例中只展示一件作品或预告片。通过这种方法,我们希望确定哪家公司更了解他们的使用方式,以及他们是否通过良好利用这种媒体赢得了任何优势,这种媒体是他们与观众之间的更多互动,也是展示他们产品的更有效方式。我们从帖子和评论的角度得出了电影工作室影响力和社交媒体之间的相关性。YouTube是电影制片厂的主要社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cinematic blueprint on Social Media: A comparative analysis
This paper aims to analyze the activity of the three biggest movie studios in social media, 20h Century Fox, Warner Bros and Universal Studios, and how that is affecting in the numbers and importance of each. Through deep searches, professional advice and the use of some statistic programs, we were able to pull out some interesting assumptions that will be discussed. We have focused in different parts of each Social Media since, we think, each one is designed to fulfill one specific aspect, for example create discussions or just present a piece of work or trailer in our case. With that approach we expect to determine which of the companies has understood better the way they have to be used and if they had won any kind of advantage through the good use of this medias presented as more interaction between themselves and the viewers and a more effective way to present their products. We conclude a correlation between movie studios impact and social media in terms of posts and comments. YouTube is the main social media for movie studios companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Una Vespa para Luca Muerte del cine, ¿larga vida del audiovisual? El astracán, lo grotesco y el esperpento en la comedia de Pedro Almodóvar Discursos y representaciones de la mujer compositora en el cine: el caso de Clara Wieck La metáfora visual en el universo del fotógrafo Tatsuya Tanaka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1