北极研究从能力建设转向能力共享:在北极网年度科学会议上考虑合作研究的转型转变

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES Polar Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/2154896X.2023.2205248
L. Mercer, Kimberly L. Ovitz
{"title":"北极研究从能力建设转向能力共享:在北极网年度科学会议上考虑合作研究的转型转变","authors":"L. Mercer, Kimberly L. Ovitz","doi":"10.1080/2154896X.2023.2205248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arctic research is progressing towards research in collaborative partnership with as opposed to on or in Arctic Indigenous communities (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022; Wong, Ballegooyen, Ignace, Johnson, Swanson, Gùdia Swanson 2020; ITK 2018). These collaborative, often cross-cultural partnerships are more equitable and impactful and have proven to be particularly effective at generating actionable knowledge that can enhance evidence-based decision making (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022) In recent years funding bodies and governance institutions have emphasized the need to build Indigenous community capacity to conduct Arctic research, however, this framing fails to acknowledge the crucial skills, unique place-based knowledge, and research capabilities that Arctic Indigenous peoples already possess and actively contribute towards research processes. As such, we argue for a shift away from capacity building (a one-way and top-down information flow often involving training Arctic residents in western science tools and methods) towards capacity sharing (a two-way exchange process that builds on Indigenous and western science knowledge and practices). Capacity sharing is developed from a foundation of reciprocity, communication, and collaboration and involves multi-directional knowledge exchange between research partners. At present, this terminology is applied across many research spheres yet there is no prevailing universal definition for capacity sharing, which leads to confusion and uncertainty (AOS 2022). We refine the definition of capacity sharing in the context of collaborative and community-engaged research and identify the elements critical to this process and to successfully transitioning from capacity building to capacity sharing in Arctic research. In December 2022, we facilitated a conference session on capacity sharing in collaborative research occurring in Inuit Nunangat at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting in Toronto, Canada (Archambault, Dawson, Barnard, Baird, Demers,","PeriodicalId":52117,"journal":{"name":"Polar Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"172 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting from capacity building to capacity sharing in Arctic research: Considering transformative shifts in collaborative research at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting\",\"authors\":\"L. Mercer, Kimberly L. Ovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2154896X.2023.2205248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arctic research is progressing towards research in collaborative partnership with as opposed to on or in Arctic Indigenous communities (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022; Wong, Ballegooyen, Ignace, Johnson, Swanson, Gùdia Swanson 2020; ITK 2018). These collaborative, often cross-cultural partnerships are more equitable and impactful and have proven to be particularly effective at generating actionable knowledge that can enhance evidence-based decision making (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022) In recent years funding bodies and governance institutions have emphasized the need to build Indigenous community capacity to conduct Arctic research, however, this framing fails to acknowledge the crucial skills, unique place-based knowledge, and research capabilities that Arctic Indigenous peoples already possess and actively contribute towards research processes. As such, we argue for a shift away from capacity building (a one-way and top-down information flow often involving training Arctic residents in western science tools and methods) towards capacity sharing (a two-way exchange process that builds on Indigenous and western science knowledge and practices). Capacity sharing is developed from a foundation of reciprocity, communication, and collaboration and involves multi-directional knowledge exchange between research partners. At present, this terminology is applied across many research spheres yet there is no prevailing universal definition for capacity sharing, which leads to confusion and uncertainty (AOS 2022). We refine the definition of capacity sharing in the context of collaborative and community-engaged research and identify the elements critical to this process and to successfully transitioning from capacity building to capacity sharing in Arctic research. In December 2022, we facilitated a conference session on capacity sharing in collaborative research occurring in Inuit Nunangat at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting in Toronto, Canada (Archambault, Dawson, Barnard, Baird, Demers,\",\"PeriodicalId\":52117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"172 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2023.2205248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2023.2205248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北极研究正朝着与北极土著社区合作而非在北极土著社区内进行研究的方向发展(Henri,Martinez Levasseur,Provencher,Debets,Appaqaq Houde 2022;Wong,Balleguyen,Ignace,Johnson,Swanson,Gúdia Swanson 2020;ITK 2018)。这些协作,跨文化伙伴关系往往更公平、更具影响力,并已被证明在产生可操作的知识方面特别有效,这些知识可以加强循证决策(Henri,Martinez Levasseur,Provencher,Debets,Appaqaq Houde 2022)近年来,资助机构和治理机构强调需要建立土著社区的行为能力然而,北极研究的框架没有承认北极土著人民已经拥有的关键技能、独特的地方知识和研究能力,并积极为研究进程做出贡献。因此,我们主张从能力建设(一种单向和自上而下的信息流,通常涉及对北极居民进行西方科学工具和方法的培训)转向能力共享(一种建立在土著和西方科学知识和实践基础上的双向交流过程)。能力共享是在互惠、沟通和协作的基础上发展起来的,涉及研究伙伴之间的多方向知识交流。目前,这一术语适用于许多研究领域,但对能力共享没有普遍的定义,这导致了混乱和不确定性(AOS 2022)。我们在合作和社区参与研究的背景下完善了能力共享的定义,并确定了这一过程以及北极研究从能力建设成功过渡到能力共享的关键要素。2022年12月,在加拿大多伦多举行的ArcticNet年度科学会议上,我们促成了在因纽特人努南加特举行的合作研究能力共享会议(Archambault、Dawson、Barnard、Baird、Demers、,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shifting from capacity building to capacity sharing in Arctic research: Considering transformative shifts in collaborative research at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting
Arctic research is progressing towards research in collaborative partnership with as opposed to on or in Arctic Indigenous communities (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022; Wong, Ballegooyen, Ignace, Johnson, Swanson, Gùdia Swanson 2020; ITK 2018). These collaborative, often cross-cultural partnerships are more equitable and impactful and have proven to be particularly effective at generating actionable knowledge that can enhance evidence-based decision making (Henri, Martinez-Levasseur, Provencher, Debets, Appaqaq Houde 2022) In recent years funding bodies and governance institutions have emphasized the need to build Indigenous community capacity to conduct Arctic research, however, this framing fails to acknowledge the crucial skills, unique place-based knowledge, and research capabilities that Arctic Indigenous peoples already possess and actively contribute towards research processes. As such, we argue for a shift away from capacity building (a one-way and top-down information flow often involving training Arctic residents in western science tools and methods) towards capacity sharing (a two-way exchange process that builds on Indigenous and western science knowledge and practices). Capacity sharing is developed from a foundation of reciprocity, communication, and collaboration and involves multi-directional knowledge exchange between research partners. At present, this terminology is applied across many research spheres yet there is no prevailing universal definition for capacity sharing, which leads to confusion and uncertainty (AOS 2022). We refine the definition of capacity sharing in the context of collaborative and community-engaged research and identify the elements critical to this process and to successfully transitioning from capacity building to capacity sharing in Arctic research. In December 2022, we facilitated a conference session on capacity sharing in collaborative research occurring in Inuit Nunangat at the ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting in Toronto, Canada (Archambault, Dawson, Barnard, Baird, Demers,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Journal
Polar Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Antarctica and the Arctic are of crucial importance to global security. Their governance and the patterns of human interactions there are increasingly contentious; mining, tourism, bioprospecting, and fishing are but a few of the many issues of contention, while environmental concerns such as melting ice sheets have a global impact. The Polar Journal is a forum for the scholarly discussion of polar issues from a social science and humanities perspective and brings together the considerable number of specialists and policy makers working on these crucial regions across multiple disciplines. The journal welcomes papers on polar affairs from all fields of the social sciences and the humanities and is especially interested in publishing policy-relevant research. Each issue of the journal either features articles from different disciplines on polar affairs or is a topical theme from a range of scholarly approaches. Topics include: • Polar governance and policy • Polar history, heritage, and culture • Polar economics • Polar politics • Music, art, and literature of the polar regions • Polar tourism • Polar geography and geopolitics • Polar psychology • Polar archaeology Manuscript types accepted: • Regular articles • Research reports • Opinion pieces • Book Reviews • Conference Reports.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the economic and political history of the Ross Sea Globalised imaginaries, Arctification and resistance in Arctic tourism – an Arctification perspective on tourism actors’ views on seasonality and growth in Ylläs tourism destination Experiencing Svalbard sustainably? Reflecting on what we can learn about polar cruise tourism from the SEES expedition The Antarctic Peninsula: Argentina and Chile in the era of global change Committing to the Antarctic: values, ecological beliefs, and social identity in national perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1