探讨政府拨款和援助在B3中上市的巴西公司的披露差异

Francisco Batista dos Santos Neto, João Pedro Moura Magalhães, Jackeline Lucas Souza, Paulo Henrique Nobre Parente
{"title":"探讨政府拨款和援助在B3中上市的巴西公司的披露差异","authors":"Francisco Batista dos Santos Neto, João Pedro Moura Magalhães, Jackeline Lucas Souza, Paulo Henrique Nobre Parente","doi":"10.16930/2237-7662202333202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to explore the differences in the disclosure of Government Grants and Assistance (SAG) in publicly traded Brazilian companies. The sample consists of 353 publicly traded companies listed on Brasil, Bolsa and Balcão (B3) between 2017 and 2019. The data were obtained by analyzing the content of the explanatory notes referring to the Standardized Financial Statements (DFP) available on the company's website. B3 S/A, verifying the information related to SAG, as stated in the Accounting Pronouncements Committees (CPC), CPC 07 (2008) and CPC 07 R1 (2010). To achieve the objectives of the study, an independent t-mean comparison test and analysis of variance were performed. The results showed that the SAG are mostly of State (39.8%) and Federal (38.6%) origin and the most representative SAG is granted to companies through tax incentives (54.1%). The results of the statistical tests show that the level of SAG disclosure does not differ according to corporate governance and the period. On the other hand, the results show that unregulated companies present higher levels of SAG disclosure and that the oil, gas and biofuels and health sectors presented, respectively, the highest and lowest levels of SAG disclosure. The study seeks to contribute to the literature by evidencing the existence of differences, or not, in the level of disclosure of SAG based on company characteristics, such as the level of corporate governance, regulation, the sample period and the sector of activity.","PeriodicalId":30684,"journal":{"name":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Disclosure differentials of government grants and assistance in Brazilian companies listed in B3\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Batista dos Santos Neto, João Pedro Moura Magalhães, Jackeline Lucas Souza, Paulo Henrique Nobre Parente\",\"doi\":\"10.16930/2237-7662202333202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to explore the differences in the disclosure of Government Grants and Assistance (SAG) in publicly traded Brazilian companies. The sample consists of 353 publicly traded companies listed on Brasil, Bolsa and Balcão (B3) between 2017 and 2019. The data were obtained by analyzing the content of the explanatory notes referring to the Standardized Financial Statements (DFP) available on the company's website. B3 S/A, verifying the information related to SAG, as stated in the Accounting Pronouncements Committees (CPC), CPC 07 (2008) and CPC 07 R1 (2010). To achieve the objectives of the study, an independent t-mean comparison test and analysis of variance were performed. The results showed that the SAG are mostly of State (39.8%) and Federal (38.6%) origin and the most representative SAG is granted to companies through tax incentives (54.1%). The results of the statistical tests show that the level of SAG disclosure does not differ according to corporate governance and the period. On the other hand, the results show that unregulated companies present higher levels of SAG disclosure and that the oil, gas and biofuels and health sectors presented, respectively, the highest and lowest levels of SAG disclosure. The study seeks to contribute to the literature by evidencing the existence of differences, or not, in the level of disclosure of SAG based on company characteristics, such as the level of corporate governance, regulation, the sample period and the sector of activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202333202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202333202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨巴西上市公司在政府补助和援助(SAG)披露方面的差异。样本包括2017年至2019年间在巴西、博萨和巴尔科(B3)上市的353家上市公司。这些数据是通过分析公司网站上的标准化财务报表(DFP)解释性说明的内容获得的。B3 S/A,核实会计公告委员会(CPC)、CPC 07(2008)和CPC 07 R1(2010)中所述的与SAG相关的信息。为了达到研究目的,进行了独立的t均值比较检验和方差分析。结果表明,SAG主要来源于州(39.8%)和联邦(38.6%),最具代表性的SAG是通过税收优惠授予公司的(54.1%)。统计测试结果表明,不同公司治理和时期的SAG披露水平没有差异。另一方面,研究结果显示,不受监管的公司的SAG披露水平较高,石油、天然气、生物燃料和卫生部门的SAG信息披露水平分别最高和最低。该研究试图通过证明基于公司特征(如公司治理水平、监管、样本期和活动部门)的SAG披露水平是否存在差异,为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Disclosure differentials of government grants and assistance in Brazilian companies listed in B3
The study aims to explore the differences in the disclosure of Government Grants and Assistance (SAG) in publicly traded Brazilian companies. The sample consists of 353 publicly traded companies listed on Brasil, Bolsa and Balcão (B3) between 2017 and 2019. The data were obtained by analyzing the content of the explanatory notes referring to the Standardized Financial Statements (DFP) available on the company's website. B3 S/A, verifying the information related to SAG, as stated in the Accounting Pronouncements Committees (CPC), CPC 07 (2008) and CPC 07 R1 (2010). To achieve the objectives of the study, an independent t-mean comparison test and analysis of variance were performed. The results showed that the SAG are mostly of State (39.8%) and Federal (38.6%) origin and the most representative SAG is granted to companies through tax incentives (54.1%). The results of the statistical tests show that the level of SAG disclosure does not differ according to corporate governance and the period. On the other hand, the results show that unregulated companies present higher levels of SAG disclosure and that the oil, gas and biofuels and health sectors presented, respectively, the highest and lowest levels of SAG disclosure. The study seeks to contribute to the literature by evidencing the existence of differences, or not, in the level of disclosure of SAG based on company characteristics, such as the level of corporate governance, regulation, the sample period and the sector of activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Transparency and Readability of the Financial Statements of the Ceará Government during the Covid-19 Pandemic Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Sistema de Avaliação de Desempenho Performance Appraisal System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1