{"title":"莫斯塔尔老桥的破坏:集体城市空间与生活的断裂","authors":"Asja Mandić","doi":"10.1386/ijia_00117_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the destruction of the sixteenth-century pedestrian bridge of the city of Mostar, the Old Bridge, during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–95) as a substantial disruption to the city’s urban fabric. The bridge was the symbol of the city, its most recognizable landmark, and a monument that linked two sides of the Neretva River into an integral urban unit. Reflecting on the repercussions of such violence in the context of the image of the city, I address the identity of the bridge, and the social relations inscribed in the materiality of the surrounding urban space. Due to the violence of the war and continued interethnic conflict, the meaning of the bridge changed; the construction of a new bridge on the same site was unable to repair breaches in the social relationships between Mostar’s communities. Architectural responses to rupture in the divided and contested city are exemplified in Mostar, an urban setting that has been ravaged by war, trauma, and ethno-nationalism.","PeriodicalId":41944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Architecture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Destruction of the Old Bridge in Mostar: A Rupture in Collective Urban Space and Life\",\"authors\":\"Asja Mandić\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/ijia_00117_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the destruction of the sixteenth-century pedestrian bridge of the city of Mostar, the Old Bridge, during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–95) as a substantial disruption to the city’s urban fabric. The bridge was the symbol of the city, its most recognizable landmark, and a monument that linked two sides of the Neretva River into an integral urban unit. Reflecting on the repercussions of such violence in the context of the image of the city, I address the identity of the bridge, and the social relations inscribed in the materiality of the surrounding urban space. Due to the violence of the war and continued interethnic conflict, the meaning of the bridge changed; the construction of a new bridge on the same site was unable to repair breaches in the social relationships between Mostar’s communities. Architectural responses to rupture in the divided and contested city are exemplified in Mostar, an urban setting that has been ravaged by war, trauma, and ethno-nationalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Islamic Architecture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Islamic Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/ijia_00117_1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ijia_00117_1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Destruction of the Old Bridge in Mostar: A Rupture in Collective Urban Space and Life
This article examines the destruction of the sixteenth-century pedestrian bridge of the city of Mostar, the Old Bridge, during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–95) as a substantial disruption to the city’s urban fabric. The bridge was the symbol of the city, its most recognizable landmark, and a monument that linked two sides of the Neretva River into an integral urban unit. Reflecting on the repercussions of such violence in the context of the image of the city, I address the identity of the bridge, and the social relations inscribed in the materiality of the surrounding urban space. Due to the violence of the war and continued interethnic conflict, the meaning of the bridge changed; the construction of a new bridge on the same site was unable to repair breaches in the social relationships between Mostar’s communities. Architectural responses to rupture in the divided and contested city are exemplified in Mostar, an urban setting that has been ravaged by war, trauma, and ethno-nationalism.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Islamic Architecture (IJIA) publishes bi-annually, peer-reviewed articles on the urban design and planning, architecture and landscape architecture of the historic Islamic world, encompassing the Middle East and parts of Africa and Asia, but also the more recent geographies of Islam in its global dimensions. The main emphasis is on the detailed analysis of the practical, historical and theoretical aspects of architecture, with a focus on both design and its reception. The journal also aims to encourage dialogue and discussion between practitioners and scholars. Articles that bridge the academic-practitioner divide are highly encouraged. While the main focus is on architecture, papers that explore architecture from other disciplinary perspectives, such as art, history, archaeology, anthropology, culture, spirituality, religion and economics are also welcome. The journal is specifically interested in contemporary architecture and urban design in relation to social and cultural history, geography, politics, aesthetics, technology and conservation. Spanning across cultures and disciplines, IJIA seeks to analyse and explain issues related to the built environment throughout the regions covered. The audience of this journal includes both practitioners and scholars. The journal publishes both online and in print. The first issue was published in January 2012.