重新思考与COVID-19卫生、社会和经济紧急情况相关的社会法律实践

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Precedente Pub Date : 2021-01-13 DOI:10.18046/PREC.V18.4570
Laura Marcela Martínez Mejía, M. A. Ramírez
{"title":"重新思考与COVID-19卫生、社会和经济紧急情况相关的社会法律实践","authors":"Laura Marcela Martínez Mejía, M. A. Ramírez","doi":"10.18046/PREC.V18.4570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This document attempts to reflect critically on the function of alternative legal education as a pillar of the clinical method, from a broad contextual hindsight of the global phenomenon of COVID-19 and its nationwide impacts, and how it demonstrates the real disability of the rule of law to extend social justice around the whole popular corpus This argument affirms the need to decolonize the law as a reproducer of coloniality of being, of knowledge and power The working method is as follows First, it is proposed as a prelude to an invitation to overcome the legal-centric or traditionalist views of law that have not questioned the reproductive function of crisis on behalf of the modern/colonial/capitalist state The backbone category of hidden people allows to understand that the discrimination and social exclusion aggravated by COVID-19 are crossed by racism, as a result of coloniality These backbone categories (racism and coloniality) are built as explanatory pillars of the double exception state phenomena, that emerges in peripheral areas of the country In this scenario, our goal is trying to clarify the importance of the socio-legal, clinical method and the fundamental objects of its implementation from an integral, social and solidary point of view The objective is proposing as a horizon the necessity of rethinking the clinic method with the integration of other knowledge that enrich the juridic education in context and that allows the use of traditional tools of public interest law as inputs for a counter-hegemonic fight, capable of fracturing the structural matrix of coloniality","PeriodicalId":53905,"journal":{"name":"Precedente","volume":"18 1","pages":"159-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repensar la praxis sociojurídica a propósito de la emergencia sanitaria, social y económica por COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Laura Marcela Martínez Mejía, M. A. Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.18046/PREC.V18.4570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This document attempts to reflect critically on the function of alternative legal education as a pillar of the clinical method, from a broad contextual hindsight of the global phenomenon of COVID-19 and its nationwide impacts, and how it demonstrates the real disability of the rule of law to extend social justice around the whole popular corpus This argument affirms the need to decolonize the law as a reproducer of coloniality of being, of knowledge and power The working method is as follows First, it is proposed as a prelude to an invitation to overcome the legal-centric or traditionalist views of law that have not questioned the reproductive function of crisis on behalf of the modern/colonial/capitalist state The backbone category of hidden people allows to understand that the discrimination and social exclusion aggravated by COVID-19 are crossed by racism, as a result of coloniality These backbone categories (racism and coloniality) are built as explanatory pillars of the double exception state phenomena, that emerges in peripheral areas of the country In this scenario, our goal is trying to clarify the importance of the socio-legal, clinical method and the fundamental objects of its implementation from an integral, social and solidary point of view The objective is proposing as a horizon the necessity of rethinking the clinic method with the integration of other knowledge that enrich the juridic education in context and that allows the use of traditional tools of public interest law as inputs for a counter-hegemonic fight, capable of fracturing the structural matrix of coloniality\",\"PeriodicalId\":53905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precedente\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"159-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precedente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precedente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18046/PREC.V18.4570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文件试图从新冠肺炎全球现象及其全国影响的广泛背景回顾,批判性地反思替代法律教育作为临床方法支柱的功能,以及它如何证明法治在将社会正义扩展到整个大众主体方面的真正缺陷。这一论点肯定了将法律非殖民化为存在、知识和权力的殖民主义复制品的必要性。工作方法如下:首先,它被提议作为一个前奏,以克服以法律为中心或传统主义的法律观点,这些观点没有代表现代/殖民/资本主义国家质疑危机的生殖功能。隐藏者的骨干类别使人们能够理解,新冠肺炎加剧的歧视和社会排斥与种族主义相交叉,作为殖民主义的结果,这些支柱类别(种族主义和殖民主义)被建立为国家外围地区出现的双重例外状态现象的解释支柱。在这种情况下,我们的目标是试图从整体上阐明社会法律、临床方法的重要性及其实施的基本对象,社会和团结的观点。目标是提出重新思考临床方法的必要性,并整合其他知识,丰富背景下的法学教育,并允许使用公共利益法的传统工具作为反霸权斗争的投入,能够打破殖民主义的结构矩阵
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repensar la praxis sociojurídica a propósito de la emergencia sanitaria, social y económica por COVID-19
This document attempts to reflect critically on the function of alternative legal education as a pillar of the clinical method, from a broad contextual hindsight of the global phenomenon of COVID-19 and its nationwide impacts, and how it demonstrates the real disability of the rule of law to extend social justice around the whole popular corpus This argument affirms the need to decolonize the law as a reproducer of coloniality of being, of knowledge and power The working method is as follows First, it is proposed as a prelude to an invitation to overcome the legal-centric or traditionalist views of law that have not questioned the reproductive function of crisis on behalf of the modern/colonial/capitalist state The backbone category of hidden people allows to understand that the discrimination and social exclusion aggravated by COVID-19 are crossed by racism, as a result of coloniality These backbone categories (racism and coloniality) are built as explanatory pillars of the double exception state phenomena, that emerges in peripheral areas of the country In this scenario, our goal is trying to clarify the importance of the socio-legal, clinical method and the fundamental objects of its implementation from an integral, social and solidary point of view The objective is proposing as a horizon the necessity of rethinking the clinic method with the integration of other knowledge that enrich the juridic education in context and that allows the use of traditional tools of public interest law as inputs for a counter-hegemonic fight, capable of fracturing the structural matrix of coloniality
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precedente
Precedente LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conceptualización jurídica en tanto mediación ética: el caso del derecho a la muerte digna en Colombia Población venezolana en Perú en tiempos de COVID-19: luchar contra la adversidad para lograr la inclusión social. Nuevas invisibilizaciones estatales de un fenómeno conocido: gobernanza sin un enfoque diferencial en situaciones de emergencia Análisis jurídico de la tributación de los contratos de leasing financiero en la legislación colombiana a partir de los cambios introducidos por la Ley 1819 de 2016 Nicolás Maquiavelo: padre del constitucionalismo moderno
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1