非洲区域间论坛购物——欧盟关系:区域集团和不断演变的安全-发展-移民关系

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10220461.2022.2119161
Friedrich Plank
{"title":"非洲区域间论坛购物——欧盟关系:区域集团和不断演变的安全-发展-移民关系","authors":"Friedrich Plank","doi":"10.1080/10220461.2022.2119161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the mushrooming of overlapping regionalism in Africa, there has also evolved a dense web of relationships between Africa and the European Union (EU) on matters of interregional security relations. In this context, the EU increasingly favours regional groups such as the G5 Sahel instead of its established partnerships with regional economic communities or the African Union. To account for these rather puzzling preferences, this study argues that the EU’s emphasis on the security-development-migration nexus overrides rational forum shopping logic, leading to cooperation with the G5 Sahel in response to the crisis in that region rather than with traditional partners embedded in the African Peace and Security Architecture. Drawing on a wide range of data including interviews, this study considers the dynamics of interregional forum shopping and the security-development-migration nexus. It thus relates these to current trends in the Africa–EU partnership on peace and security, considering both sides of the relationship.","PeriodicalId":44641,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","volume":"29 1","pages":"271 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interregional forum shopping in Africa–EU relations: Regional groups and the evolving security-development-migration nexus\",\"authors\":\"Friedrich Plank\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10220461.2022.2119161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With the mushrooming of overlapping regionalism in Africa, there has also evolved a dense web of relationships between Africa and the European Union (EU) on matters of interregional security relations. In this context, the EU increasingly favours regional groups such as the G5 Sahel instead of its established partnerships with regional economic communities or the African Union. To account for these rather puzzling preferences, this study argues that the EU’s emphasis on the security-development-migration nexus overrides rational forum shopping logic, leading to cooperation with the G5 Sahel in response to the crisis in that region rather than with traditional partners embedded in the African Peace and Security Architecture. Drawing on a wide range of data including interviews, this study considers the dynamics of interregional forum shopping and the security-development-migration nexus. It thus relates these to current trends in the Africa–EU partnership on peace and security, considering both sides of the relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"271 - 293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2119161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2119161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要随着重叠的区域主义在非洲如雨后春笋般涌现,非洲与欧盟在区域间安全关系问题上也形成了一张密集的关系网。在这种情况下,欧盟越来越倾向于萨赫勒五国集团等区域集团,而不是与区域经济共同体或非洲联盟建立伙伴关系。为了解释这些令人困惑的偏好,这项研究认为,欧盟对安全-发展-移民关系的重视凌驾于理性的论坛购物逻辑之上,导致与萨赫勒五国集团合作应对该地区的危机,而不是与非洲和平与安全架构中的传统合作伙伴合作。本研究利用包括访谈在内的广泛数据,考虑了区域间论坛购物的动态和安全与发展与移民的关系。因此,考虑到非洲与欧盟和平与安全伙伴关系的双方,它将这些与当前的趋势联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interregional forum shopping in Africa–EU relations: Regional groups and the evolving security-development-migration nexus
ABSTRACT With the mushrooming of overlapping regionalism in Africa, there has also evolved a dense web of relationships between Africa and the European Union (EU) on matters of interregional security relations. In this context, the EU increasingly favours regional groups such as the G5 Sahel instead of its established partnerships with regional economic communities or the African Union. To account for these rather puzzling preferences, this study argues that the EU’s emphasis on the security-development-migration nexus overrides rational forum shopping logic, leading to cooperation with the G5 Sahel in response to the crisis in that region rather than with traditional partners embedded in the African Peace and Security Architecture. Drawing on a wide range of data including interviews, this study considers the dynamics of interregional forum shopping and the security-development-migration nexus. It thus relates these to current trends in the Africa–EU partnership on peace and security, considering both sides of the relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Inclusive elections? The case of persons with disabilities in the European Union Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance Mitigating the impact of democratic recession through electoral assistance in Africa Global trends and impact of democratic recession: Hard choices for the Global South African election management bodies in the era of democratic backsliding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1