M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami
{"title":"教育服务质量差距评估:学生视角","authors":"M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami","doi":"10.5812/erms.80246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"M. Alijanzadeh, Hamed Fattahi, F. Veisi, Bahram Alizadeh, Zeinab Khedmatgozar, S. Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/erms.80246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.80246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.80246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Educational Service Quality Gap: The Students’ Perspectives
Background: Noonecandenytheimportanceof educationalservicesandtheroleitplaysinattainingsocialgoals. Propertraining and students’ satisfaction leads to system promotion and finally social development. This study aimed to evaluate the educational service quality in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS). Methods: Thiscross-sectionalstudywasconductedin2014among327studentsofQUMSwhowereselectedthroughsimplerandom sampling. The most significant variables were tangibility, assurance, empathy, reliability, and accountability of the educational service quality. The data were collected using the 27 - item SERVQUAL questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha score ( α = 0.88) and test retest (R = 0.83) method were used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Results: Theaverageageof thestudentswas22.2 ± 3.1years. Thequalitygapof theeducationalserviceswas-1.62,-1.70,-1.52,-1.31,and-1.15forassurance,accountability,empathy,reliability,andtangibility,respectively,whichwasstatisticallysignificant(P< 0.001). The meaneducationalservicequalitygapwas-1.38basedonthestudents’ perceptions(P< 0.001). Therewasnosignificantrelationship between the students’ perceptions and expectations and their gender (P > 0.05). Conclusions: There are significant gaps in the educational service quality regarding accountability and assurance. More attention from policymakers seems to improve the educational service quality.