学科素养、能动性和教学文本:来自微积分教科书有声思考研究的发现

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2126048
Ellie Fitts Fulmer, Christina L. Dobbs, Aaron Weinberg, Emilie Wiesner
{"title":"学科素养、能动性和教学文本:来自微积分教科书有声思考研究的发现","authors":"Ellie Fitts Fulmer, Christina L. Dobbs, Aaron Weinberg, Emilie Wiesner","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2126048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Textbooks have been the subject of research within and across disciplines, but have not yet been widely studied from a disciplinary literacy perspective. Readerly agency is also understudied in disciplinary literacy. The present paper aims to illuminate both of these areas by examining facets of agency that readers demonstrated during think-aloud interviews with a college calculus textbook, thus exploring the disciplinary literacies that are involved in reading this didactical text. Authors have drawn on the recently forwarded theory of “didactical disciplinary literacy,” as well as definitions of agency in both literacy and math fields, to reveal how agency was enacted by readers using the textbook to negotiate unknowns in calculus. Findings show participants exhibiting agency in a range of ways, but not always in direct relationship to themselves as agents within the field of mathematics. This study invites college instructors and secondary teachers to consider ways they might foster didactical disciplinary literacy skills to support student learners in mathematics, and other disciplines.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"628 - 659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplinary Literacy, Agency, and Didactical Texts: Findings from a Calculus Textbook Think-Aloud Study\",\"authors\":\"Ellie Fitts Fulmer, Christina L. Dobbs, Aaron Weinberg, Emilie Wiesner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02702711.2022.2126048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Textbooks have been the subject of research within and across disciplines, but have not yet been widely studied from a disciplinary literacy perspective. Readerly agency is also understudied in disciplinary literacy. The present paper aims to illuminate both of these areas by examining facets of agency that readers demonstrated during think-aloud interviews with a college calculus textbook, thus exploring the disciplinary literacies that are involved in reading this didactical text. Authors have drawn on the recently forwarded theory of “didactical disciplinary literacy,” as well as definitions of agency in both literacy and math fields, to reveal how agency was enacted by readers using the textbook to negotiate unknowns in calculus. Findings show participants exhibiting agency in a range of ways, but not always in direct relationship to themselves as agents within the field of mathematics. This study invites college instructors and secondary teachers to consider ways they might foster didactical disciplinary literacy skills to support student learners in mathematics, and other disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"628 - 659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要教科书一直是学科内部和跨学科研究的主题,但尚未从学科素养的角度进行广泛研究。读者代理在学科素养方面也未得到充分研究。本论文旨在通过研究读者在大学微积分教科书的思考访谈中表现出的代理方面来阐明这两个领域,从而探索阅读这一教学文本所涉及的学科素养。作者借鉴了最近提出的“教学学科素养”理论,以及识字和数学领域的代理定义,揭示了读者如何使用教科书来解决微积分中的未知问题。研究结果表明,参与者以一系列方式展示代理,但并不总是与自己作为数学领域的代理直接相关。本研究邀请大学教师和中学教师考虑如何培养教学学科素养技能,以支持数学和其他学科的学生学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disciplinary Literacy, Agency, and Didactical Texts: Findings from a Calculus Textbook Think-Aloud Study
Abstract Textbooks have been the subject of research within and across disciplines, but have not yet been widely studied from a disciplinary literacy perspective. Readerly agency is also understudied in disciplinary literacy. The present paper aims to illuminate both of these areas by examining facets of agency that readers demonstrated during think-aloud interviews with a college calculus textbook, thus exploring the disciplinary literacies that are involved in reading this didactical text. Authors have drawn on the recently forwarded theory of “didactical disciplinary literacy,” as well as definitions of agency in both literacy and math fields, to reveal how agency was enacted by readers using the textbook to negotiate unknowns in calculus. Findings show participants exhibiting agency in a range of ways, but not always in direct relationship to themselves as agents within the field of mathematics. This study invites college instructors and secondary teachers to consider ways they might foster didactical disciplinary literacy skills to support student learners in mathematics, and other disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1