药物管理分心观察表检查表:西班牙语的文化适应和验证

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Revista Cuidarte Pub Date : 2022-08-26 DOI:10.22201/fesi.23958979e.2022.11.22.80074
Olga Lucia Gaitan Gómez, Luz Stella Bueno-Robles, T. Pape
{"title":"药物管理分心观察表检查表:西班牙语的文化适应和验证","authors":"Olga Lucia Gaitan Gómez, Luz Stella Bueno-Robles, T. Pape","doi":"10.22201/fesi.23958979e.2022.11.22.80074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Distractions are sensory inputs that exceed the individual's attention threshold, which is why they have been associated with procedural failures and clinical errors in care practice. Objective. To adapt and validate the “Observation Sheet for Distractions in the Administration of Medication” to the Colombian context. Materials and methods. The study followed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and methodological approach that included the cultural adaptation and validation of both the appearance and the content of an instrument measuring two attributes of the concept of distractions—namely, origin and frequency—with the input of five experts on the topic. Inter-observer reliability was determined through the kappa coefficient, and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the statistical package SPSS v22. Results. Once adapted and validated to Colombian Spanish, the checklist kept all of the original items of the instrument, with a content validity ratio and index of 1, an inter-observer reliability between 0.82 and 1.00 (substantial agreement), and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.54 (acceptable). Conclusions. Few studies admit to using the instrument as the author proposes; some draw inspiration from it to create their own instruments, while others use it but do not report its validation. Only three studies, including this one, report psychometric analyses performed on the instrument with minor changes after its execution. The instrument can be applied to clinical nursing practice in Colombia; in the future, it is recommended to include new attributes of the concept.","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION DISTRACTION OBSERVATION SHEET CHECKLIST: CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION INTO SPANISH\",\"authors\":\"Olga Lucia Gaitan Gómez, Luz Stella Bueno-Robles, T. Pape\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/fesi.23958979e.2022.11.22.80074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Distractions are sensory inputs that exceed the individual's attention threshold, which is why they have been associated with procedural failures and clinical errors in care practice. Objective. To adapt and validate the “Observation Sheet for Distractions in the Administration of Medication” to the Colombian context. Materials and methods. The study followed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and methodological approach that included the cultural adaptation and validation of both the appearance and the content of an instrument measuring two attributes of the concept of distractions—namely, origin and frequency—with the input of five experts on the topic. Inter-observer reliability was determined through the kappa coefficient, and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the statistical package SPSS v22. Results. Once adapted and validated to Colombian Spanish, the checklist kept all of the original items of the instrument, with a content validity ratio and index of 1, an inter-observer reliability between 0.82 and 1.00 (substantial agreement), and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.54 (acceptable). Conclusions. Few studies admit to using the instrument as the author proposes; some draw inspiration from it to create their own instruments, while others use it but do not report its validation. Only three studies, including this one, report psychometric analyses performed on the instrument with minor changes after its execution. The instrument can be applied to clinical nursing practice in Colombia; in the future, it is recommended to include new attributes of the concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Cuidarte\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Cuidarte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.23958979e.2022.11.22.80074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.23958979e.2022.11.22.80074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍分心是指超过个人注意力阈值的感觉输入,这就是为什么它们与护理实践中的程序失败和临床错误有关。客观的根据哥伦比亚的情况调整和验证“药物管理分心观察表”。材料和方法。这项研究采用了定量、横断面和方法论的方法,包括对一种测量分心概念的两个属性(即起源和频率)的工具的外观和内容进行文化适应和验证,并由五位专家参与。通过kappa系数以及与SPSS v22统计包中的Cronbachα系数的内部一致性来确定观察者间的可靠性。后果一旦根据哥伦比亚西班牙语进行了调整和验证,检查表保留了仪器的所有原始项目,内容有效性比率和指数为1,观察者之间的可靠性在0.82和1.00之间(基本一致),Cronbachα为0.54(可接受)。结论。很少有研究承认使用了作者提出的工具;一些人从中获得灵感,创建了自己的仪器,而另一些人则使用它,但没有报告其验证情况。只有三项研究,包括这项研究,报告了在仪器执行后发生微小变化的情况下对其进行的心理测量分析。该仪器可应用于哥伦比亚的临床护理实践;将来,建议包含该概念的新属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION DISTRACTION OBSERVATION SHEET CHECKLIST: CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION INTO SPANISH
Introduction. Distractions are sensory inputs that exceed the individual's attention threshold, which is why they have been associated with procedural failures and clinical errors in care practice. Objective. To adapt and validate the “Observation Sheet for Distractions in the Administration of Medication” to the Colombian context. Materials and methods. The study followed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and methodological approach that included the cultural adaptation and validation of both the appearance and the content of an instrument measuring two attributes of the concept of distractions—namely, origin and frequency—with the input of five experts on the topic. Inter-observer reliability was determined through the kappa coefficient, and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the statistical package SPSS v22. Results. Once adapted and validated to Colombian Spanish, the checklist kept all of the original items of the instrument, with a content validity ratio and index of 1, an inter-observer reliability between 0.82 and 1.00 (substantial agreement), and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.54 (acceptable). Conclusions. Few studies admit to using the instrument as the author proposes; some draw inspiration from it to create their own instruments, while others use it but do not report its validation. Only three studies, including this one, report psychometric analyses performed on the instrument with minor changes after its execution. The instrument can be applied to clinical nursing practice in Colombia; in the future, it is recommended to include new attributes of the concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Cuidarte
Revista Cuidarte NURSING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fratura femoral em pessoa idosa: dependência dos cuidados de enfermagem Sostenibilidad ambiental, el olvido que invisibiliza a la enfermería Olas de calor en el Caribe colombiano: ¿un problema de salud pública? Atención primaria en salud: significados de enfermeros de un municipio de Colombia Fatores Associados aos Triggers e Eventos Adversos em Pediatria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1