{"title":"创建具有风险-回报效率和税务意识的高收入投资组合的整体方法","authors":"Todd Schlanger, Brennan O’Connor, H. Ahluwalia","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2022.49.1.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retirees and other investors may prefer to use dividends from equities and interest from fixed income to fund their spending needs. This mental accounting phenomenon of spending the portfolio’s income without drawing down the invested principal makes them seek high income–producing asset classes. These investors, either directly or via advisors, adopt static high income portfolios as an investment strategy, often ignoring risk–return efficiency and tax efficiency principles. In this article, the authors introduce a methodology to systematically construct high income portfolios through an expected utility of wealth maximization approach while allowing for the incorporation of an investor’s income preferences. However, because asset return expectations are conditional on asset valuations, the authors find that popular static high income portfolios that are created on an ad hoc basis—by substituting broad market exposure with high-yielding assets—by design are not optimal. More importantly, the authors find that high income portfolios are tax inefficient when it comes to high tax bracket investors, making their use only appropriate when taxes are not a primary concern—for example, for low- to moderate-income investors or in a tax-deferred account.","PeriodicalId":53670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"198 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Holistic Approach to Creating High Income Portfolios That Are Risk–Return Efficient and Tax Aware\",\"authors\":\"Todd Schlanger, Brennan O’Connor, H. Ahluwalia\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2022.49.1.198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Retirees and other investors may prefer to use dividends from equities and interest from fixed income to fund their spending needs. This mental accounting phenomenon of spending the portfolio’s income without drawing down the invested principal makes them seek high income–producing asset classes. These investors, either directly or via advisors, adopt static high income portfolios as an investment strategy, often ignoring risk–return efficiency and tax efficiency principles. In this article, the authors introduce a methodology to systematically construct high income portfolios through an expected utility of wealth maximization approach while allowing for the incorporation of an investor’s income preferences. However, because asset return expectations are conditional on asset valuations, the authors find that popular static high income portfolios that are created on an ad hoc basis—by substituting broad market exposure with high-yielding assets—by design are not optimal. More importantly, the authors find that high income portfolios are tax inefficient when it comes to high tax bracket investors, making their use only appropriate when taxes are not a primary concern—for example, for low- to moderate-income investors or in a tax-deferred account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2022.49.1.198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2022.49.1.198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Holistic Approach to Creating High Income Portfolios That Are Risk–Return Efficient and Tax Aware
Retirees and other investors may prefer to use dividends from equities and interest from fixed income to fund their spending needs. This mental accounting phenomenon of spending the portfolio’s income without drawing down the invested principal makes them seek high income–producing asset classes. These investors, either directly or via advisors, adopt static high income portfolios as an investment strategy, often ignoring risk–return efficiency and tax efficiency principles. In this article, the authors introduce a methodology to systematically construct high income portfolios through an expected utility of wealth maximization approach while allowing for the incorporation of an investor’s income preferences. However, because asset return expectations are conditional on asset valuations, the authors find that popular static high income portfolios that are created on an ad hoc basis—by substituting broad market exposure with high-yielding assets—by design are not optimal. More importantly, the authors find that high income portfolios are tax inefficient when it comes to high tax bracket investors, making their use only appropriate when taxes are not a primary concern—for example, for low- to moderate-income investors or in a tax-deferred account.
期刊介绍:
Founded by Peter Bernstein in 1974, The Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM) is the definitive source of thought-provoking analysis and practical techniques in institutional investing. It offers cutting-edge research on asset allocation, performance measurement, market trends, risk management, portfolio optimization, and more. Each quarterly issue of JPM features articles by the most renowned researchers and practitioners—including Nobel laureates—whose works define modern portfolio theory.