通过纯线上或结合线下零售的渠道侵占策略

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 MANAGEMENT IMA Journal of Management Mathematics Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1093/imaman/dpac014
Sheng Chen, Ruidong Zhao
{"title":"通过纯线上或结合线下零售的渠道侵占策略","authors":"Sheng Chen, Ruidong Zhao","doi":"10.1093/imaman/dpac014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With the rise of e-commerce, an increasing number of retailers concentrate on the online channel to sell their products (strategy O), while some retailers select online and offline combined retailing. That is, the retailers introduce an offline experience store in addition to their online channels (strategy B). However, there is little literature on which strategies are better when a retailer’s intrusion is considered. This paper constructs a competitive system in which the incumbent is a well-established pure online retailer and the new entrant will decide which strategy to select, strategy O or strategy B. The hotelling model is applied to represent the competitive market of both retailers through consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products, and Nash games under two strategies are built. Through comparing equilibrium solutions, we show that when consumers prefer the incumbent’s product, Online and offline retailing is an effective strategy for the new entrant to compete with the incumbent. Meanwhile, the incumbent’s advantage does not always benefit him. Consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products may intensify the competition between them and hurt their profits, but the new entrant can benefit from providing offline retailing under most cases.","PeriodicalId":56296,"journal":{"name":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Channel encroachment strategy through pure online or combined offline retailing\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Chen, Ruidong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/imaman/dpac014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n With the rise of e-commerce, an increasing number of retailers concentrate on the online channel to sell their products (strategy O), while some retailers select online and offline combined retailing. That is, the retailers introduce an offline experience store in addition to their online channels (strategy B). However, there is little literature on which strategies are better when a retailer’s intrusion is considered. This paper constructs a competitive system in which the incumbent is a well-established pure online retailer and the new entrant will decide which strategy to select, strategy O or strategy B. The hotelling model is applied to represent the competitive market of both retailers through consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products, and Nash games under two strategies are built. Through comparing equilibrium solutions, we show that when consumers prefer the incumbent’s product, Online and offline retailing is an effective strategy for the new entrant to compete with the incumbent. Meanwhile, the incumbent’s advantage does not always benefit him. Consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products may intensify the competition between them and hurt their profits, but the new entrant can benefit from providing offline retailing under most cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpac014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpac014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着电子商务的兴起,越来越多的零售商专注于在线渠道销售产品(策略O),而一些零售商则选择线上和线下相结合的零售方式。也就是说,零售商除了在线渠道外,还引入了线下体验店(策略B)。然而,当考虑零售商的入侵时,很少有文献表明哪种策略更好。本文构建了一个竞争系统,其中在位者是一个成熟的纯在线零售商,新进入者将决定选择哪种策略,策略O还是策略B。酒店营销模型通过消费者对产品的不对称偏好来代表两个零售商的竞争市场,并建立了两种策略下的纳什博弈。通过比较均衡解,我们发现当消费者更喜欢在位者的产品时,线上和线下零售是新进入者与在位者竞争的有效策略。同时,现任总统的优势并不总是对他有利。消费者对产品的不对称偏好可能会加剧他们之间的竞争并损害他们的利润,但在大多数情况下,新进入者可以从提供线下零售中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Channel encroachment strategy through pure online or combined offline retailing
With the rise of e-commerce, an increasing number of retailers concentrate on the online channel to sell their products (strategy O), while some retailers select online and offline combined retailing. That is, the retailers introduce an offline experience store in addition to their online channels (strategy B). However, there is little literature on which strategies are better when a retailer’s intrusion is considered. This paper constructs a competitive system in which the incumbent is a well-established pure online retailer and the new entrant will decide which strategy to select, strategy O or strategy B. The hotelling model is applied to represent the competitive market of both retailers through consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products, and Nash games under two strategies are built. Through comparing equilibrium solutions, we show that when consumers prefer the incumbent’s product, Online and offline retailing is an effective strategy for the new entrant to compete with the incumbent. Meanwhile, the incumbent’s advantage does not always benefit him. Consumers’ asymmetrical preference for products may intensify the competition between them and hurt their profits, but the new entrant can benefit from providing offline retailing under most cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of this quarterly journal is to publish mathematical research of the highest quality, impact and relevance that can be directly utilised or have demonstrable potential to be employed by managers in profit, not-for-profit, third party and governmental/public organisations to improve their practices. Thus the research must be quantitative and of the highest quality if it is to be published in the journal. Furthermore, the outcome of the research must be ultimately useful for managers. The journal also publishes novel meta-analyses of the literature, reviews of the "state-of-the art" in a manner that provides new insight, and genuine applications of mathematics to real-world problems in the form of case studies. The journal welcomes papers dealing with topics in Operational Research and Management Science, Operations Management, Decision Sciences, Transportation Science, Marketing Science, Analytics, and Financial and Risk Modelling.
期刊最新文献
A generalized approach for pricing american options under a regime-switching model Cost-based performance optimization of a single system under a hierarchical imperfect maintenance policy Robustness of copula-correction models in causal analysis: Exploiting between-regressor correlation Managing flexibility in supply chains: mathematical analysis of dual sourcing systems On head-to-head results as tie-breaker and consequent opportunities for collusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1