从动态产权理论看英国和中国的农业和工业革命

Q3 Arts and Humanities Rural China Pub Date : 2020-09-21 DOI:10.1163/22136746-01702002
Xiao-ying Pei
{"title":"从动态产权理论看英国和中国的农业和工业革命","authors":"Xiao-ying Pei","doi":"10.1163/22136746-01702002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a dynamic land property rights theory based on the law of the limit to land productivity, and then uses this theory and a large amount of data to compare the history of the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England and China. The article finds that, in England, the arable land-especially sown land-per capita of the agricultural population trended downward before the Black Death, but after the Black Death, experienced a long-term upward trend. In China, however, over the same period, the sown area per capita of the rural population shrank. It is these opposing trends that account for the historical divergence between the economies of England and China. This article concludes that the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England, as well as England's capitalist market and private property rights regime, are the result of the expansion of the sown area per capita of the agricultural population. The article also concludes that the claim that England's capitalist system of markets and private property rights gave birth to its agricultural and industrial revolutions cannot be sustained.","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"17 1","pages":"194-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22136746-01702002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions in England and China: A View through the Lens of Dynamic Property Rights Theory\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-ying Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22136746-01702002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a dynamic land property rights theory based on the law of the limit to land productivity, and then uses this theory and a large amount of data to compare the history of the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England and China. The article finds that, in England, the arable land-especially sown land-per capita of the agricultural population trended downward before the Black Death, but after the Black Death, experienced a long-term upward trend. In China, however, over the same period, the sown area per capita of the rural population shrank. It is these opposing trends that account for the historical divergence between the economies of England and China. This article concludes that the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England, as well as England's capitalist market and private property rights regime, are the result of the expansion of the sown area per capita of the agricultural population. The article also concludes that the claim that England's capitalist system of markets and private property rights gave birth to its agricultural and industrial revolutions cannot be sustained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural China\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"194-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22136746-01702002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-01702002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-01702002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种基于土地生产力极限定律的动态土地产权理论,并利用该理论和大量数据对英国和中国的农业和工业革命历史进行了比较。文章发现,在英国,黑死病之前,农业人口的可耕地特别是人均播种面积呈下降趋势,但在黑死病之后,却经历了长期的上升趋势。然而,在同一时期,中国农村人口的人均播种面积有所减少。正是这些相反的趋势导致了英格兰和中国经济之间的历史分歧。本文认为,英国的农业和工业革命,以及英国的资本主义市场和私有产权制度,都是农业人口人均播种面积扩大的结果。文章还得出结论,认为英国的资本主义市场和私人产权制度催生了其农业和工业革命的说法是不可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions in England and China: A View through the Lens of Dynamic Property Rights Theory
This article presents a dynamic land property rights theory based on the law of the limit to land productivity, and then uses this theory and a large amount of data to compare the history of the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England and China. The article finds that, in England, the arable land-especially sown land-per capita of the agricultural population trended downward before the Black Death, but after the Black Death, experienced a long-term upward trend. In China, however, over the same period, the sown area per capita of the rural population shrank. It is these opposing trends that account for the historical divergence between the economies of England and China. This article concludes that the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England, as well as England's capitalist market and private property rights regime, are the result of the expansion of the sown area per capita of the agricultural population. The article also concludes that the claim that England's capitalist system of markets and private property rights gave birth to its agricultural and industrial revolutions cannot be sustained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural China
Rural China Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
What Is Minimalist Governance? Connecting Small Peasants with Large Markets: The Need for a New Type of Rural Collective Economy – a Case Study of Zhanqi Village “Whither the Chinese Peasant Economy?”: An Introduction Smallholders in Capitalist Agriculture: Persistence and Challenges Peasant Agency and Community Mutual Aid: An Alternative to Capital and Market Dominance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1