Koshi Ota , Yuriko Takeda , Daisuke Nishioka , Masahiro Oka , Emi Hamada , Kanna Ota , Yuriko Shibata , Kazuma Yamakawa , Akira Takasu
{"title":"急诊科受污染血培养的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Koshi Ota , Yuriko Takeda , Daisuke Nishioka , Masahiro Oka , Emi Hamada , Kanna Ota , Yuriko Shibata , Kazuma Yamakawa , Akira Takasu","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Koshi Ota , Yuriko Takeda , Daisuke Nishioka , Masahiro Oka , Emi Hamada , Kanna Ota , Yuriko Shibata , Kazuma Yamakawa , Akira Takasu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; <em>P</em> < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352223000191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352223000191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors for contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study
Background
We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).
Methods
This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.
Results
We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; P < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.
Conclusions
Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.
期刊介绍:
The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.