急诊科受污染血培养的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Microbial Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264
Koshi Ota , Yuriko Takeda , Daisuke Nishioka , Masahiro Oka , Emi Hamada , Kanna Ota , Yuriko Shibata , Kazuma Yamakawa , Akira Takasu
{"title":"急诊科受污染血培养的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Koshi Ota ,&nbsp;Yuriko Takeda ,&nbsp;Daisuke Nishioka ,&nbsp;Masahiro Oka ,&nbsp;Emi Hamada ,&nbsp;Kanna Ota ,&nbsp;Yuriko Shibata ,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa ,&nbsp;Akira Takasu","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Koshi Ota ,&nbsp;Yuriko Takeda ,&nbsp;Daisuke Nishioka ,&nbsp;Masahiro Oka ,&nbsp;Emi Hamada ,&nbsp;Kanna Ota ,&nbsp;Yuriko Shibata ,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa ,&nbsp;Akira Takasu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352223000191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352223000191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是确定与急诊科(ED)污染血培养率相关的危险因素。方法在大学附属医院急诊科进行为期26个月的1098例≥20岁连续患者的单中心队列研究。结果共分析了2096对血培养。在2096对血培养物中鉴定出172例(8.2%)存在潜在污染。多因素分析显示,使用聚维酮碘(PVI)消毒穿刺部位时,污染发生率高于酒精/葡萄糖酸氯己定(校正优势比为7.13;95%置信区间[CI], 4.8-10.7;P & lt;0.001)。股静脉和中心静脉导管比外周静脉导管更容易受到污染。第一年或第二年住院医生采集的血液没有显示出受污染血液培养物的增加。结论血培养污染率与PVI及特定部位有显著相关性,与居民采血量无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study

Background

We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period.

Results

We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; P < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures.

Conclusions

Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Spatial risk assessment of ovine Scrapie in Brazil” [Microbial Risk Analysis 25 (2023) 100282] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica contaminating hydroponic leafy vegetables Assessing urban street food safety among youth: The impact of road dust on potential microbial contamination risks to student health Measuring transboundary disease spread - ASF in wild boars straddling Piedmont and Liguria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1