制定形成性评估协议以支持专业成长

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2020-06-16 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956
E. Wylie, Christine J. Lyon
{"title":"制定形成性评估协议以支持专业成长","authors":"E. Wylie, Christine J. Lyon","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using formative assessment practices in the classroom, we developed and piloted a suite of materials which consists of a set of rubrics for ten dimensions of formative assessment and six self-reflection/peer-observation tools. We describe the iterative development process, the design decisions and challenges, and the findings from an early pilot in which twenty-four educators from five states used the materials. We also report on a content validation study was conducted with seven subject matter experts who confirmed the importance of the ten formative assessment dimensions and did not identify any significant omissions. Finally we have preliminary findings from a group of teachers who engaged with a set of training modules to support their understanding of the rubrics before applying them to classroom practice through peer observation and feedback.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"314 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth\",\"authors\":\"E. Wylie, Christine J. Lyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using formative assessment practices in the classroom, we developed and piloted a suite of materials which consists of a set of rubrics for ten dimensions of formative assessment and six self-reflection/peer-observation tools. We describe the iterative development process, the design decisions and challenges, and the findings from an early pilot in which twenty-four educators from five states used the materials. We also report on a content validation study was conducted with seven subject matter experts who confirmed the importance of the ten formative assessment dimensions and did not identify any significant omissions. Finally we have preliminary findings from a group of teachers who engaged with a set of training modules to support their understanding of the rubrics before applying them to classroom practice through peer observation and feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"314 - 330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要为了促进和支持教师在课堂上使用形成性评估实践的专业成长,我们开发并试行了一套材料,其中包括一套用于形成性评估十个维度的准则和六种自我反思/同伴观察工具。我们描述了迭代开发过程、设计决策和挑战,以及早期试点的发现,来自五个州的24名教育工作者使用了这些材料。我们还报告了一项内容验证研究,该研究由七名主题专家进行,他们确认了十个形成性评估维度的重要性,没有发现任何重大遗漏。最后,我们从一群教师那里得到了初步的发现,他们参与了一套培训模块,以支持他们在通过同伴观察和反馈将准则应用于课堂实践之前对准则的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth
ABSTRACT To promote and support teachers’ professional growth in using formative assessment practices in the classroom, we developed and piloted a suite of materials which consists of a set of rubrics for ten dimensions of formative assessment and six self-reflection/peer-observation tools. We describe the iterative development process, the design decisions and challenges, and the findings from an early pilot in which twenty-four educators from five states used the materials. We also report on a content validation study was conducted with seven subject matter experts who confirmed the importance of the ten formative assessment dimensions and did not identify any significant omissions. Finally we have preliminary findings from a group of teachers who engaged with a set of training modules to support their understanding of the rubrics before applying them to classroom practice through peer observation and feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis Raising the Bar: How Revising an English Language Proficiency Assessment for Initial English Learner Classification Affects Students’ Later Academic Achievements Monitoring Rater Quality in Observational Systems: Issues Due to Unreliable Estimates of Rater Quality Improving the Precision of Classroom Observation Scores Using a Multi-Rater and Multi-Timepoint Item Response Theory Model High Stakes Assessments in Primary Schools and Teachers’ Anxiety About Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1