3D乳腺自动超声系统:高级和初级放射科医生解释时间的比较。

Aydan Arslan, G. Ertas, E. Arıbal
{"title":"3D乳腺自动超声系统:高级和初级放射科医生解释时间的比较。","authors":"Aydan Arslan, G. Ertas, E. Arıbal","doi":"10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nThis study aimed to compare the automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) reading time of breast radiologist to a radiology resident independent of the clinical outcomes.\n\n\nMaterials and Methods\nOne hundred women who underwent screening ABUS between July and August 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Each study was examined sequentially by a breast radiologist who has more than 20 years of experience in breast radiology and third year resident who has 6 months of experience in breast radiology. Data were analyzed with Spearman' correlation, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test and was recorded.\n\n\nResults\nThe mean age of patients was 42.02±11.423 years (age range16-66). The average time for senior radiologist was 223.36±84.334 seconds (min 118 max 500 seconds). The average time for junior radiologist was 269.48±82.895 seconds (min 150 max 628 seconds). There was a significant difference between the mean time of two radiologists (p=0.00001). There was a significant difference regarding the decrease in the reading time throughout study with the increase of number of cases read by the breast radiologist (p<0.05); but not with the resident radiologist (p=0.687). There was a correlation between BI-RADS category and reading time for both the breast radiologist and the resident (p=0.002, p=0.00043 respectively) indicating that patients who had findings caused longer reading times.\n\n\nConclusion\nABUS reading time may differ according to the experience of the user, however the times of an experienced and non-experienced user is comparable.","PeriodicalId":91975,"journal":{"name":"The journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System: Comparison of Interpretation Time of Senior Versus Junior Radiologist.\",\"authors\":\"Aydan Arslan, G. Ertas, E. Arıbal\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\nThis study aimed to compare the automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) reading time of breast radiologist to a radiology resident independent of the clinical outcomes.\\n\\n\\nMaterials and Methods\\nOne hundred women who underwent screening ABUS between July and August 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Each study was examined sequentially by a breast radiologist who has more than 20 years of experience in breast radiology and third year resident who has 6 months of experience in breast radiology. Data were analyzed with Spearman' correlation, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test and was recorded.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThe mean age of patients was 42.02±11.423 years (age range16-66). The average time for senior radiologist was 223.36±84.334 seconds (min 118 max 500 seconds). The average time for junior radiologist was 269.48±82.895 seconds (min 150 max 628 seconds). There was a significant difference between the mean time of two radiologists (p=0.00001). There was a significant difference regarding the decrease in the reading time throughout study with the increase of number of cases read by the breast radiologist (p<0.05); but not with the resident radiologist (p=0.687). There was a correlation between BI-RADS category and reading time for both the breast radiologist and the resident (p=0.002, p=0.00043 respectively) indicating that patients who had findings caused longer reading times.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nABUS reading time may differ according to the experience of the user, however the times of an experienced and non-experienced user is comparable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of breast health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of breast health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/EJBH.2019.4468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的比较独立于临床结果的乳腺放射科医师与住院放射科医师的自动乳腺超声系统(ABUS)读取时间。材料与方法回顾性分析2017年7月至8月期间接受ABUS筛查的100名女性。每项研究都由一名有超过20年乳房放射学经验的乳房放射学家和一名有6个月乳房放射学经验的第三年住院医师依次检查。采用Spearman相关检验、Wilcoxon sign Ranks检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析并记录。结果患者平均年龄42.02±11.423岁(16 ~ 66岁)。高级放射科医师的平均时间为223.36±84.334秒(最小118秒,最大500秒)。初级放射科医师的平均时间为269.48±82.895秒(最小150秒,最大628秒)。两名放射科医师的平均时间差异有统计学意义(p=0.00001)。随着乳腺放射科医师阅读病例数的增加,整个研究中阅读时间的减少有显著差异(p<0.05);但与住院放射科医生无关(p=0.687)。乳腺放射科医生和住院医生的BI-RADS分类与阅读时间之间存在相关性(p=0.002, p=0.00043),这表明有发现的患者的阅读时间更长。结论阅读时间因用户经验不同而有差异,但有经验用户和无经验用户的阅读时间具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System: Comparison of Interpretation Time of Senior Versus Junior Radiologist.
Objective This study aimed to compare the automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) reading time of breast radiologist to a radiology resident independent of the clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods One hundred women who underwent screening ABUS between July and August 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Each study was examined sequentially by a breast radiologist who has more than 20 years of experience in breast radiology and third year resident who has 6 months of experience in breast radiology. Data were analyzed with Spearman' correlation, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test and was recorded. Results The mean age of patients was 42.02±11.423 years (age range16-66). The average time for senior radiologist was 223.36±84.334 seconds (min 118 max 500 seconds). The average time for junior radiologist was 269.48±82.895 seconds (min 150 max 628 seconds). There was a significant difference between the mean time of two radiologists (p=0.00001). There was a significant difference regarding the decrease in the reading time throughout study with the increase of number of cases read by the breast radiologist (p<0.05); but not with the resident radiologist (p=0.687). There was a correlation between BI-RADS category and reading time for both the breast radiologist and the resident (p=0.002, p=0.00043 respectively) indicating that patients who had findings caused longer reading times. Conclusion ABUS reading time may differ according to the experience of the user, however the times of an experienced and non-experienced user is comparable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Stromal Elastin Fibers in Breast Cancer and Fibroadenomas: Is There a Correlation With Ultrasound Elastography Findings? Digital Mammography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics in Differential Diagnosis of Papillary Carcinoma Subtypes of the Breast and Diagnostic Challenges. The Benefit of Routine Axillary Sonographic Assessment in cN0 Breast Cancer Patients. Overexpression of miR-490-5p/miR-490-3p Potentially Induces IL-17-Producing T Cells in Patients With Breast Cancer. Patient Satisfaction and Surgical Outcome After Oncoplastic Reconstruction following Radical Lumpectomy Versus Standard Lumpectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1