事件相关电位揭示公共演讲焦虑个体情感认知互动受损

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.5104
Farah Shahnaz Feroz, Muhammad Hairulnizam Mat Ali, Afiq Idzudden Ismail, Ahmad Rifhan Salman, F. Shahbodin
{"title":"事件相关电位揭示公共演讲焦虑个体情感认知互动受损","authors":"Farah Shahnaz Feroz, Muhammad Hairulnizam Mat Ali, Afiq Idzudden Ismail, Ahmad Rifhan Salman, F. Shahbodin","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.5104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used reaction time (RT) and event-related potential (ERP) analysis in an emotion-cognition Eriksen-Flanker (ECEF) task to investigate behavioral and neural abnormalities in individuals with public speaking anxiety (PSA). Although 25 per cent of people worldwide suffer from PSA, there is currently a lack of standardized assessment or biomarkers to detect emotion-cognition abnormalities in individuals with PSA.\n\nRT and ERP were compared between 12 subjects with high (H) PSA\nand 12 subjects with low (L) PSA in the ECEF experiment. EEG\nwas recorded with the 14-channel Emotiv EPOC+.\n\nRT data showed a significant Flanker Effect across groups in the\nneutral and emotional (PSA-related) conditions, with increased Flanker\neffect in the HPSA group. On average, LPSA subjects were faster than\nthe HPSA subjects in the ECEF task. HPSA subjects showed aberrant\nERP responses in two ways. Firstly in the reversed N200 conflict\neffect with increased frontocentral amplitude in the incongruent\ncompared to the congruent condition. Secondly, in the absence of the\nP200 frontocentral emotional modulation found in LPSA subjects. In\nthe HPSA group, decreased P200 amplitude is significantly related to\nimpaired behavioral performance in the neutral congruent condition.\n\nRT and ERP are useful in modern medicine because they successfully unveiled the biomarkers of abnormalities during the interaction of emotion and cognition. Impaired conflict processing in PSA-related condi- tions was found at the N200 and P200 windows in HPSA individuals.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS REVEAL IMPAIRED EMOTION-COGNITION INTERACTION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH PUBLIC\\nSPEAKING ANXIETY\",\"authors\":\"Farah Shahnaz Feroz, Muhammad Hairulnizam Mat Ali, Afiq Idzudden Ismail, Ahmad Rifhan Salman, F. Shahbodin\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.5104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study used reaction time (RT) and event-related potential (ERP) analysis in an emotion-cognition Eriksen-Flanker (ECEF) task to investigate behavioral and neural abnormalities in individuals with public speaking anxiety (PSA). Although 25 per cent of people worldwide suffer from PSA, there is currently a lack of standardized assessment or biomarkers to detect emotion-cognition abnormalities in individuals with PSA.\\n\\nRT and ERP were compared between 12 subjects with high (H) PSA\\nand 12 subjects with low (L) PSA in the ECEF experiment. EEG\\nwas recorded with the 14-channel Emotiv EPOC+.\\n\\nRT data showed a significant Flanker Effect across groups in the\\nneutral and emotional (PSA-related) conditions, with increased Flanker\\neffect in the HPSA group. On average, LPSA subjects were faster than\\nthe HPSA subjects in the ECEF task. HPSA subjects showed aberrant\\nERP responses in two ways. Firstly in the reversed N200 conflict\\neffect with increased frontocentral amplitude in the incongruent\\ncompared to the congruent condition. Secondly, in the absence of the\\nP200 frontocentral emotional modulation found in LPSA subjects. In\\nthe HPSA group, decreased P200 amplitude is significantly related to\\nimpaired behavioral performance in the neutral congruent condition.\\n\\nRT and ERP are useful in modern medicine because they successfully unveiled the biomarkers of abnormalities during the interaction of emotion and cognition. Impaired conflict processing in PSA-related condi- tions was found at the N200 and P200 windows in HPSA individuals.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropsychologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropsychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.5104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.5104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用情绪认知Eriksen-Flanker (ECEF)任务中的反应时间(RT)和事件相关电位(ERP)分析,探讨了公共演讲焦虑(PSA)个体的行为和神经异常。虽然全世界有25%的人患有PSA,但目前缺乏标准化的评估或生物标志物来检测PSA患者的情绪认知异常。比较12例高(H) PSA组和12例低(L) PSA组在ECEF实验中的RT和ERP。用14通道Emotiv EPOC+记录脑电图。RT数据显示,在中性和情绪(psa相关)条件下,各组间存在显著的侧卫效应,HPSA组的侧卫效应增加。平均而言,LPSA受试者在ECEF任务中的速度比HPSA受试者快。HPSA受试者在两方面表现出异常的p反应。首先在反向N200冲突效应中,不一致条件下的额中央幅值比一致条件下的有所增加。第二,在LPSA受试者缺乏p200额中央情绪调节的情况下。在HPSA组中,P200振幅下降与中性一致条件下的行为表现受损显著相关。RT和ERP在现代医学中很有用,因为它们成功地揭示了情绪和认知相互作用过程中异常的生物标志物。在HPSA个体的N200和P200窗口处发现与psa相关的冲突处理受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS REVEAL IMPAIRED EMOTION-COGNITION INTERACTION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH PUBLIC SPEAKING ANXIETY
This study used reaction time (RT) and event-related potential (ERP) analysis in an emotion-cognition Eriksen-Flanker (ECEF) task to investigate behavioral and neural abnormalities in individuals with public speaking anxiety (PSA). Although 25 per cent of people worldwide suffer from PSA, there is currently a lack of standardized assessment or biomarkers to detect emotion-cognition abnormalities in individuals with PSA. RT and ERP were compared between 12 subjects with high (H) PSA and 12 subjects with low (L) PSA in the ECEF experiment. EEG was recorded with the 14-channel Emotiv EPOC+. RT data showed a significant Flanker Effect across groups in the neutral and emotional (PSA-related) conditions, with increased Flanker effect in the HPSA group. On average, LPSA subjects were faster than the HPSA subjects in the ECEF task. HPSA subjects showed aberrant ERP responses in two ways. Firstly in the reversed N200 conflict effect with increased frontocentral amplitude in the incongruent compared to the congruent condition. Secondly, in the absence of the P200 frontocentral emotional modulation found in LPSA subjects. In the HPSA group, decreased P200 amplitude is significantly related to impaired behavioral performance in the neutral congruent condition. RT and ERP are useful in modern medicine because they successfully unveiled the biomarkers of abnormalities during the interaction of emotion and cognition. Impaired conflict processing in PSA-related condi- tions was found at the N200 and P200 windows in HPSA individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Neuropsychological diagnosis of a female patient with Arnold-Chiari malformation type I Psychological rehabilitation of combatants in Ukraine from 2014 to 2021: statistics and current status EYE TRACKER AS A TOOL SUPPORTING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS IN THE STATES OF DISORDES OF CONSCIOUSNESS (DOC) DETERMINANTSOF BURNOUT AND ITS PREVALENCE AMONG EMPLOYEES IN A MOROCCAN PRIVATE COMPANY THE IMPACT OF PERSONALITY TRAITS AND STUDY MODE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND STIMULANT USE AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1