语言教学法与晚年语言学习能力

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1515/iral-2023-0079
Mara van der Ploeg, Merel Keijzer, W. Lowie
{"title":"语言教学法与晚年语言学习能力","authors":"Mara van der Ploeg, Merel Keijzer, W. Lowie","doi":"10.1515/iral-2023-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Late-life language learning has gained considerable attention in recent years. Strikingly, additional language (AL) proficiency development is underinvestigated, despite it potentially being one of the main drivers for older adults to learn an AL. Our study investigates whether Dutch older adults learning English for three months significantly improve their AL skills, and if explicit or implicit language instruction is more beneficial. Sixteen learners participated in online weekly group lessons, five days of 60-min homework, and pre-post-retention tests. Half were randomly assigned to the mostly explicit condition and half to the mostly implicit condition. Data includes language proficiency measures and 201 dense-data spoken homework samples. Results show improvements in several areas for both conditions. For structural errors in homework, we found implicitly taught participants to make significantly more mistakes. Our exploratory data show that older adults significantly develop AL proficiency after a short language training, and, as we only found differences between conditions on one construct, that teaching pedagogies do not play a substantial role.","PeriodicalId":46778,"journal":{"name":"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language pedagogies and late-life language learning proficiency\",\"authors\":\"Mara van der Ploeg, Merel Keijzer, W. Lowie\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iral-2023-0079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Late-life language learning has gained considerable attention in recent years. Strikingly, additional language (AL) proficiency development is underinvestigated, despite it potentially being one of the main drivers for older adults to learn an AL. Our study investigates whether Dutch older adults learning English for three months significantly improve their AL skills, and if explicit or implicit language instruction is more beneficial. Sixteen learners participated in online weekly group lessons, five days of 60-min homework, and pre-post-retention tests. Half were randomly assigned to the mostly explicit condition and half to the mostly implicit condition. Data includes language proficiency measures and 201 dense-data spoken homework samples. Results show improvements in several areas for both conditions. For structural errors in homework, we found implicitly taught participants to make significantly more mistakes. Our exploratory data show that older adults significantly develop AL proficiency after a short language training, and, as we only found differences between conditions on one construct, that teaching pedagogies do not play a substantial role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来,晚年语言学习受到了广泛的关注。引人注目的是,尽管额外语言(AL)能力发展可能是老年人学习AL的主要驱动因素之一,但它却被低估了。我们的研究调查了荷兰老年人学习英语三个月是否能显著提高他们的AL技能,以及显性或隐性语言教学是否更有益。16名学习者参加了每周在线小组课、为期5天的60分钟家庭作业和课后保留测试。一半被随机分配到最显性的条件,一半被分配到最隐性的条件。数据包括语言能力测量和201个密集数据口语家庭作业样本。结果显示,这两种情况在几个方面都有所改善。对于家庭作业中的结构错误,我们发现隐含地教会了参与者犯更多的错误。我们的探索性数据表明,老年人在短期语言训练后显著提高了AL能力,而且,由于我们只发现了一个结构上条件之间的差异,教学法并没有发挥实质性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language pedagogies and late-life language learning proficiency
Abstract Late-life language learning has gained considerable attention in recent years. Strikingly, additional language (AL) proficiency development is underinvestigated, despite it potentially being one of the main drivers for older adults to learn an AL. Our study investigates whether Dutch older adults learning English for three months significantly improve their AL skills, and if explicit or implicit language instruction is more beneficial. Sixteen learners participated in online weekly group lessons, five days of 60-min homework, and pre-post-retention tests. Half were randomly assigned to the mostly explicit condition and half to the mostly implicit condition. Data includes language proficiency measures and 201 dense-data spoken homework samples. Results show improvements in several areas for both conditions. For structural errors in homework, we found implicitly taught participants to make significantly more mistakes. Our exploratory data show that older adults significantly develop AL proficiency after a short language training, and, as we only found differences between conditions on one construct, that teaching pedagogies do not play a substantial role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching is devoted to problems of general and applied linguistics in their various forms.
期刊最新文献
The impact of guessing and retrieval strategies for learning phrasal verbs Unpacking the positioning of being “disengaged” and “disrespectful” in class through nexus analysis: an international student’s navigation of institutional and interactional university norms Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach Discipline-specific attitudinal differences of EMI students towards translanguaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1