形成性评估:由于报告数量太少而停滞不前

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1196705
W. Popham
{"title":"形成性评估:由于报告数量太少而停滞不前","authors":"W. Popham","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1196705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After providing key definitions well as substantial supportive evidence for the instructional process under consideration, this analysis identifies a serious shortcoming in the way that many U.S. educators are currently encouraging teachers' adoption of the formative-assessment process--a teaching approach informed by students' en route test performances during instruction. After identifying the basics of the formative assessment process, and the manner in which reports of students' en route assessment performances should be built, it is claimed that formative assessment will attain its much-lauded learning payoffs only when short reports, easily used by both teachers and students, are routinely employed.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative assessment: Stalled by too few right-size reports\",\"authors\":\"W. Popham\",\"doi\":\"10.21449/ijate.1196705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After providing key definitions well as substantial supportive evidence for the instructional process under consideration, this analysis identifies a serious shortcoming in the way that many U.S. educators are currently encouraging teachers' adoption of the formative-assessment process--a teaching approach informed by students' en route test performances during instruction. After identifying the basics of the formative assessment process, and the manner in which reports of students' en route assessment performances should be built, it is claimed that formative assessment will attain its much-lauded learning payoffs only when short reports, easily used by both teachers and students, are routinely employed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1196705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1196705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在为正在考虑的教学过程提供了关键的定义和实质性的支持性证据后,这项分析发现了许多美国教育工作者目前鼓励教师采用形成性评估过程的方式中的一个严重缺陷,形成性评估是一种根据学生在教学过程中的途中测试表现来确定的教学方法。在确定了形成性评估过程的基础,以及学生在途中评估表现报告的构建方式后,有人声称,只有当教师和学生都能轻松使用的简短报告被常规使用时,形成性评估才能获得备受赞誉的学习回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formative assessment: Stalled by too few right-size reports
After providing key definitions well as substantial supportive evidence for the instructional process under consideration, this analysis identifies a serious shortcoming in the way that many U.S. educators are currently encouraging teachers' adoption of the formative-assessment process--a teaching approach informed by students' en route test performances during instruction. After identifying the basics of the formative assessment process, and the manner in which reports of students' en route assessment performances should be built, it is claimed that formative assessment will attain its much-lauded learning payoffs only when short reports, easily used by both teachers and students, are routinely employed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The complexity of the grading system in Turkish higher education Global competence scale: An adaptation to measure pre-service English teachers’ global competences Language Models in Automated Essay Scoring: Insights for the Turkish Language Type I error and power rates: A comparative analysis of techniques in differential item functioning A data pipeline for e-large-scale assessments: Better automation, quality assurance, and efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1