Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke的《有趣的游戏和残酷的结构》

IF 0.9 2区社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Body & Society Pub Date : 2019-07-02 DOI:10.1177/1357034X19856092

J. Bourke

{"title":"Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke的《有趣的游戏和残酷的结构》","authors":"J. Bourke","doi":"10.1177/1357034X19856092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haneke’s film Funny Games is a reflection on the nature of pain and representation. I argue that the film closely follows Elaine Scarry’s arguments about the structure of torture. Further, by refusing to appeal to categories of generalization such as ‘sadism’ and ‘psychopathy’, Haneke undermines the process of finding meaning in violence. Haneke positions his audiences as more than just witnesses to torture, but active participants in cruelty.","PeriodicalId":47568,"journal":{"name":"Body & Society","volume":"25 1","pages":"136 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1357034X19856092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke’s Funny Games and the Structure of Cruelty\",\"authors\":\"J. Bourke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357034X19856092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Haneke’s film Funny Games is a reflection on the nature of pain and representation. I argue that the film closely follows Elaine Scarry’s arguments about the structure of torture. Further, by refusing to appeal to categories of generalization such as ‘sadism’ and ‘psychopathy’, Haneke undermines the process of finding meaning in violence. Haneke positions his audiences as more than just witnesses to torture, but active participants in cruelty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body & Society\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"136 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1357034X19856092\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X19856092\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X19856092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Haneke的电影《Funny Games》反映了痛苦和再现的本质。我认为这部电影紧跟伊莱恩·斯卡里关于酷刑结构的观点。此外，由于拒绝诉诸诸如“虐待狂”和“精神病”之类的泛化分类，哈内克破坏了在暴力中寻找意义的过程。哈内克将他的观众定位为不仅仅是酷刑的见证者，而是残忍行为的积极参与者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke’s Funny Games and the Structure of Cruelty

Haneke’s film Funny Games is a reflection on the nature of pain and representation. I argue that the film closely follows Elaine Scarry’s arguments about the structure of torture. Further, by refusing to appeal to categories of generalization such as ‘sadism’ and ‘psychopathy’, Haneke undermines the process of finding meaning in violence. Haneke positions his audiences as more than just witnesses to torture, but active participants in cruelty.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Body & Society SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Body & Society has from its inception in March 1995 as a companion journal to Theory, Culture & Society, pioneered and shaped the field of body-studies. It has been committed to theoretical openness characterized by the publication of a wide range of critical approaches to the body, alongside the encouragement and development of innovative work that contains a trans-disciplinary focus. The disciplines reflected in the journal have included anthropology, art history, communications, cultural history, cultural studies, environmental studies, feminism, film studies, health studies, leisure studies, medical history, philosophy, psychology, religious studies, science studies, sociology and sport studies.