{"title":"福柯做过《伦理学》吗?“伦理转向”、新自由主义与真理问题","authors":"Patrick Gamez","doi":"10.5195/JFFP.2018.818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues against a common misunderstanding of Foucault's work. Even after the release of his lectures at the Collège de France, which ran throughout the 1970s until his death in 1984, he is still often taken to have made an \"ethical\" turn toward the end of his life. As opposed to his genealogies of power published in the 1970s, which are relentlessly suspicious of claims of individual agency, his final monographs focus on the ethical self-formation of free individuals. I suggest that this basic misinterpretation makes possible interpretations of Foucault's work as being sympathetic to neoliberal government, by linking the ethical turn to a \"liberal\" or \"neoliberal\" turn in his thought. I present a case against the ethical turn by arguing that Foucault's main focus, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, is a concern for the ways in which we become obligated by truth. ","PeriodicalId":41846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did Foucault do Ethics? The \\\"Ethical Turn,\\\" Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Truth\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Gamez\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/JFFP.2018.818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues against a common misunderstanding of Foucault's work. Even after the release of his lectures at the Collège de France, which ran throughout the 1970s until his death in 1984, he is still often taken to have made an \\\"ethical\\\" turn toward the end of his life. As opposed to his genealogies of power published in the 1970s, which are relentlessly suspicious of claims of individual agency, his final monographs focus on the ethical self-formation of free individuals. I suggest that this basic misinterpretation makes possible interpretations of Foucault's work as being sympathetic to neoliberal government, by linking the ethical turn to a \\\"liberal\\\" or \\\"neoliberal\\\" turn in his thought. I present a case against the ethical turn by arguing that Foucault's main focus, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, is a concern for the ways in which we become obligated by truth. \",\"PeriodicalId\":41846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/JFFP.2018.818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JFFP.2018.818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
本文反对对福柯作品的一种常见误解。他在法兰西学院(college de France)的演讲一直持续了整个20世纪70年代,直到1984年去世。即便是在他发表演讲之后,人们仍然经常认为他在生命的最后阶段做出了“道德”上的转变。与他在20世纪70年代出版的权力谱系相反,他的最后几部专著关注自由个体的道德自我形成。他的权力谱系对个人代理的主张持无情的怀疑态度。我认为,这种基本的误解使福柯的作品有可能被解释为同情新自由主义政府,将道德转向与他思想中的“自由主义”或“新自由主义”转向联系起来。我提出了一个反对伦理转向的案例,我认为福柯在整个20世纪70年代和80年代的主要关注点,是关注我们被真理所约束的方式。
Did Foucault do Ethics? The "Ethical Turn," Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Truth
This paper argues against a common misunderstanding of Foucault's work. Even after the release of his lectures at the Collège de France, which ran throughout the 1970s until his death in 1984, he is still often taken to have made an "ethical" turn toward the end of his life. As opposed to his genealogies of power published in the 1970s, which are relentlessly suspicious of claims of individual agency, his final monographs focus on the ethical self-formation of free individuals. I suggest that this basic misinterpretation makes possible interpretations of Foucault's work as being sympathetic to neoliberal government, by linking the ethical turn to a "liberal" or "neoliberal" turn in his thought. I present a case against the ethical turn by arguing that Foucault's main focus, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, is a concern for the ways in which we become obligated by truth.