上市公司监事薪酬与控烟措施关系研究

4区 医学 Tobacco Regulatory Science Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI:10.18001/trs.7.6.2
Miao-Ju Wang, Pengfei Li
{"title":"上市公司监事薪酬与控烟措施关系研究","authors":"Miao-Ju Wang, Pengfei Li","doi":"10.18001/trs.7.6.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: At present, the theoretical study on supervisors' remuneration under the Company Law is still too principled, and many \"chaos\" occur in the remuneration practices for supervisors. First, the lack of clear understanding of the incentive function\n and institutional specificities of supervisors' remuneration results in many problems in the application of supervisors' remuneration in practice, as well as the ignoration of the Board of Supervisors in corporation governance. Second, rather than reaching the intended effect, the legislative\n approach of authorized \"blank\" intentionally adopted under the Company Law leaves an inducement for the ineffective supervision of supervisors in practice. Third, there is not only a lack of theoretically self-consistent discussion on the special problems of concurrent supervisors\n and employee supervisors' remuneration, but also a divorce of the institutional structure and application from good expectations. If the research background of the problem is placed in \"tobacco regulatory science\", it will be found that there is no inevitable connection between supervisors'\n compliance expectations and remuneration, but mainly depends on the provisions of legislation. Going back and forth between theory and practice of supervisors' remuneration, this paper combs and interprets the issue of supervisors' remuneration from the perspective of the legislative provisions\n and theoretical study under the Company Law, and analyzes the difference between the reality and the necessity of the Company Law with respect to the issue of supervisors' remuneration in the light of the legal principle of the Company Law, with the view to improvement\n of the rules of the Company Law.","PeriodicalId":48513,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Regulatory Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the Relationship between Supervisors' Remuneration in Listed Companies and Tobacco Control Measures\",\"authors\":\"Miao-Ju Wang, Pengfei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.18001/trs.7.6.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: At present, the theoretical study on supervisors' remuneration under the Company Law is still too principled, and many \\\"chaos\\\" occur in the remuneration practices for supervisors. First, the lack of clear understanding of the incentive function\\n and institutional specificities of supervisors' remuneration results in many problems in the application of supervisors' remuneration in practice, as well as the ignoration of the Board of Supervisors in corporation governance. Second, rather than reaching the intended effect, the legislative\\n approach of authorized \\\"blank\\\" intentionally adopted under the Company Law leaves an inducement for the ineffective supervision of supervisors in practice. Third, there is not only a lack of theoretically self-consistent discussion on the special problems of concurrent supervisors\\n and employee supervisors' remuneration, but also a divorce of the institutional structure and application from good expectations. If the research background of the problem is placed in \\\"tobacco regulatory science\\\", it will be found that there is no inevitable connection between supervisors'\\n compliance expectations and remuneration, but mainly depends on the provisions of legislation. Going back and forth between theory and practice of supervisors' remuneration, this paper combs and interprets the issue of supervisors' remuneration from the perspective of the legislative provisions\\n and theoretical study under the Company Law, and analyzes the difference between the reality and the necessity of the Company Law with respect to the issue of supervisors' remuneration in the light of the legal principle of the Company Law, with the view to improvement\\n of the rules of the Company Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Regulatory Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Regulatory Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18001/trs.7.6.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Regulatory Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18001/trs.7.6.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,《公司法》关于监事薪酬的理论研究还过于原则化,在监事薪酬实践中出现了许多“乱象”。首先,由于对监事薪酬的激励作用和制度特征缺乏清晰的认识,导致监事薪酬在实践中的运用存在诸多问题,监事会在公司治理中被忽视。第二,《公司法》有意采取的授权“空白”的立法方式非但没有达到预期效果,反而在实践中为监事监督不力留下了诱因。第三,对于兼任监事和职工监事薪酬的特殊问题,不仅缺乏理论上的自洽性讨论,而且制度结构和应用也与良好预期脱节。如果将问题的研究背景放在“烟草监管科学”中,就会发现监管者的合规预期与薪酬之间并没有必然的联系,而主要取决于立法的规定。本文在监事薪酬理论与实践之间来回穿梭,从《公司法》的立法规定和理论研究的角度对监事薪酬问题进行了梳理和解读,并从《公司法》的法理出发,分析了《公司法”在监事薪酬问题上的现实性与必要性的差异,以期完善《公司法的规则》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on the Relationship between Supervisors' Remuneration in Listed Companies and Tobacco Control Measures
Objectives: At present, the theoretical study on supervisors' remuneration under the Company Law is still too principled, and many "chaos" occur in the remuneration practices for supervisors. First, the lack of clear understanding of the incentive function and institutional specificities of supervisors' remuneration results in many problems in the application of supervisors' remuneration in practice, as well as the ignoration of the Board of Supervisors in corporation governance. Second, rather than reaching the intended effect, the legislative approach of authorized "blank" intentionally adopted under the Company Law leaves an inducement for the ineffective supervision of supervisors in practice. Third, there is not only a lack of theoretically self-consistent discussion on the special problems of concurrent supervisors and employee supervisors' remuneration, but also a divorce of the institutional structure and application from good expectations. If the research background of the problem is placed in "tobacco regulatory science", it will be found that there is no inevitable connection between supervisors' compliance expectations and remuneration, but mainly depends on the provisions of legislation. Going back and forth between theory and practice of supervisors' remuneration, this paper combs and interprets the issue of supervisors' remuneration from the perspective of the legislative provisions and theoretical study under the Company Law, and analyzes the difference between the reality and the necessity of the Company Law with respect to the issue of supervisors' remuneration in the light of the legal principle of the Company Law, with the view to improvement of the rules of the Company Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Implicit Incentive on Employee's Territorial Marking Behaviors – the Moderating Effect of Recognition Expectation Study on the Non-linear Effect of Tourism Industry Agglomeration on Economic Growth in China——Based on Inter-provincial Panel Data Measurement, Distribution Characteristics and Regional Differences Analysis of Eco-efficiency Development in Tobacco Planting Zone Coefficients Calculation of Laurent Series in the Neighborhood of Complex Variable Function Poles Discussion on the Governance Structure of "Transitional Communities" and Its Countermeasures Under Meta-Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1