不受欢迎的英属东非亚洲人。帝国后的国籍、无国籍和难民身份

IF 0.9 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY Immigrants and Minorities Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI:10.1080/02619288.2021.1967752
Sara Cosemans
{"title":"不受欢迎的英属东非亚洲人。帝国后的国籍、无国籍和难民身份","authors":"Sara Cosemans","doi":"10.1080/02619288.2021.1967752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 1972, upon expulsion from Uganda by Idi Amin, diasporic Asians, who had settled in East Africa during colonial times, underwent a second stage of global dispersal. Many of them managed to resettle in the United Kingdom, despite anti-immigrant sentiments and increasingly restrictive immigration legislation. Other large groups arrived in India and Canada. One group, however, got scattered around the globe: the approximately 10,000 ‘Asians of undetermined origin’, who were resettled as refugees under auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This article investigates how and why this group of stateless Asians became refugees and candidates for international resettlement. It argues that all British policy makers sought to use the international community to shoulder part of the burden of winding up empire, while trying to avoid convictions for breaching newly emerging legally binding international human rights obligations. The Ugandan Asian crisis fits within the history of the creation of modern British immigration control law that took shape from 1962 onwards. This article proposes to decentralise the geographical frame beyond the UK to include developments in Kenya, Uganda, and India, where East African Asians likewise became ‘undesirables’.","PeriodicalId":51940,"journal":{"name":"Immigrants and Minorities","volume":"40 1","pages":"210 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undesirable British East African Asians. Nationality, Statelessness, and Refugeehood after Empire\",\"authors\":\"Sara Cosemans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02619288.2021.1967752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In 1972, upon expulsion from Uganda by Idi Amin, diasporic Asians, who had settled in East Africa during colonial times, underwent a second stage of global dispersal. Many of them managed to resettle in the United Kingdom, despite anti-immigrant sentiments and increasingly restrictive immigration legislation. Other large groups arrived in India and Canada. One group, however, got scattered around the globe: the approximately 10,000 ‘Asians of undetermined origin’, who were resettled as refugees under auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This article investigates how and why this group of stateless Asians became refugees and candidates for international resettlement. It argues that all British policy makers sought to use the international community to shoulder part of the burden of winding up empire, while trying to avoid convictions for breaching newly emerging legally binding international human rights obligations. The Ugandan Asian crisis fits within the history of the creation of modern British immigration control law that took shape from 1962 onwards. This article proposes to decentralise the geographical frame beyond the UK to include developments in Kenya, Uganda, and India, where East African Asians likewise became ‘undesirables’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immigrants and Minorities\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"210 - 239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immigrants and Minorities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02619288.2021.1967752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immigrants and Minorities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02619288.2021.1967752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1972年,在被伊迪·阿明驱逐出乌干达之后,在殖民时期定居在东非的散居亚洲人开始了第二阶段的全球分散。他们中的许多人设法在英国重新定居,尽管反移民情绪和越来越严格的移民立法。其他大群人到达印度和加拿大。然而,有一群人分散到了世界各地:大约1万名“来历不明的亚洲人”,他们在联合国难民事务高级专员的主持下作为难民被重新安置。这篇文章调查了这群无国籍的亚洲人如何以及为什么成为难民和国际重新安置的候选人。它认为,所有英国决策者都试图利用国际社会来承担部分清算帝国的负担,同时试图避免因违反新出现的具有法律约束力的国际人权义务而被定罪。乌干达亚洲危机符合1962年以来英国现代移民管制法制定的历史。本文建议将地理框架分散到英国之外,包括肯尼亚,乌干达和印度的发展,东非亚洲人同样成为“不受欢迎的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Undesirable British East African Asians. Nationality, Statelessness, and Refugeehood after Empire
ABSTRACT In 1972, upon expulsion from Uganda by Idi Amin, diasporic Asians, who had settled in East Africa during colonial times, underwent a second stage of global dispersal. Many of them managed to resettle in the United Kingdom, despite anti-immigrant sentiments and increasingly restrictive immigration legislation. Other large groups arrived in India and Canada. One group, however, got scattered around the globe: the approximately 10,000 ‘Asians of undetermined origin’, who were resettled as refugees under auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This article investigates how and why this group of stateless Asians became refugees and candidates for international resettlement. It argues that all British policy makers sought to use the international community to shoulder part of the burden of winding up empire, while trying to avoid convictions for breaching newly emerging legally binding international human rights obligations. The Ugandan Asian crisis fits within the history of the creation of modern British immigration control law that took shape from 1962 onwards. This article proposes to decentralise the geographical frame beyond the UK to include developments in Kenya, Uganda, and India, where East African Asians likewise became ‘undesirables’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Immigrants & Minorities, founded in 1981, provides a major outlet for research into the history of immigration and related studies. It seeks to deal with the complex themes involved in the construction of "race" and with the broad sweep of ethnic and minority relations within a historical setting. Its coverage is international and recent issues have dealt with studies on the USA, Australia, the Middle East and the UK. The journal also supports an extensive review section.
期刊最新文献
Homeodomain Transcription Factors Nkx2.2 and Pax6 as Novel Biomarkers for Meningioma Tumor Treatment. Aliens: the chequered history of Britain’s wartime refugees Aliens: the chequered history of Britain’s wartime refugees , Paul Dowswell, London, Biteback Publishing, 2023, 292 pp., £25 (hardback), ISBN: 978-1-78590-793-7 Chinese Sojourners in Wartime Raj Returning to Ireland from Australia 1880-1925 Chapters of Accidents: A Writer’s Memoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1