考察积极型教练的差异辅导行为:以期望-绩效过程为指导的混合方法视角

Megan M Buning
{"title":"考察积极型教练的差异辅导行为:以期望-绩效过程为指导的混合方法视角","authors":"Megan M Buning","doi":"10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine differences in perceptions of coach behaviors of athletes of varying performance abilities situated within a self-fulfilling prophecy.  The mixed-methods approach allowed for a more holistic examination of softball athletes’ perspectives of head coaching behaviors.  Division I softball athletes (n = 148) completed the CBAS-PBS providing perceptions of head coach (n =20) behavior.  Coaches rated each athlete using the MERS providing a performance expectation score.  Thirty-eight athletes provided supporting perspectives through individual interviews on perceptions of differential treatment based on expected performance level.  Cluster analysis produced low, average, and high expectancy groups.  MANOVA and DFA revealed two underlying functions that distinguished between groups.  High expectancy athletes experienced less ‘detached’ coaching behaviors than low or average athletes. Qualitative findings supported teammates perceive lower rated athletes are treated differently.  ","PeriodicalId":92062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of amateur sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Differential Coaching Behaviors in Positive Coaches: A Mixed-Methods Perspective Guided by the Expectation Performance Process\",\"authors\":\"Megan M Buning\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine differences in perceptions of coach behaviors of athletes of varying performance abilities situated within a self-fulfilling prophecy.  The mixed-methods approach allowed for a more holistic examination of softball athletes’ perspectives of head coaching behaviors.  Division I softball athletes (n = 148) completed the CBAS-PBS providing perceptions of head coach (n =20) behavior.  Coaches rated each athlete using the MERS providing a performance expectation score.  Thirty-eight athletes provided supporting perspectives through individual interviews on perceptions of differential treatment based on expected performance level.  Cluster analysis produced low, average, and high expectancy groups.  MANOVA and DFA revealed two underlying functions that distinguished between groups.  High expectancy athletes experienced less ‘detached’ coaching behaviors than low or average athletes. Qualitative findings supported teammates perceive lower rated athletes are treated differently.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":92062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of amateur sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of amateur sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of amateur sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/JAS.V4I2.6731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项混合方法研究的目的是检验不同表现能力的运动员在自我实现预言中对教练行为的感知差异。混合方法可以更全面地检查垒球运动员对主教练行为的看法。一级垒球运动员(n=148)完成了CBAS-PBS,提供了对主教练(n=20)行为的感知。教练使用MERS对每位运动员进行评分,提供表现预期得分。38名运动员通过个人访谈,就基于预期表现水平的差别待遇的看法提供了支持性观点。聚类分析产生了期望值低、平均和高的群体。MANOVA和DFA揭示了两种不同群体的潜在功能。高期望值运动员比低期望值或一般期望值运动员经历的“超然”教练行为更少。定性研究结果支持队友认为评分较低的运动员受到不同的对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Differential Coaching Behaviors in Positive Coaches: A Mixed-Methods Perspective Guided by the Expectation Performance Process
The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine differences in perceptions of coach behaviors of athletes of varying performance abilities situated within a self-fulfilling prophecy.  The mixed-methods approach allowed for a more holistic examination of softball athletes’ perspectives of head coaching behaviors.  Division I softball athletes (n = 148) completed the CBAS-PBS providing perceptions of head coach (n =20) behavior.  Coaches rated each athlete using the MERS providing a performance expectation score.  Thirty-eight athletes provided supporting perspectives through individual interviews on perceptions of differential treatment based on expected performance level.  Cluster analysis produced low, average, and high expectancy groups.  MANOVA and DFA revealed two underlying functions that distinguished between groups.  High expectancy athletes experienced less ‘detached’ coaching behaviors than low or average athletes. Qualitative findings supported teammates perceive lower rated athletes are treated differently.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Student-Donor Memberships Within Collegiate Athletics Harmonious or Conflicted? A Qualitative Study of Father-Coach and Daughter Relationships in Youth Sport An Examination of Motivations, Attitudes and Charitable Intentions for Running in a Charity Event Perspectives on Native American Imagery from Students at a Premiere Tribal University Quality of Life is Lowest Among Female Athletes at the Community College Compared to University Sport Levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1