2019冠状病毒病大流行期间沙特阿拉伯普通人群应对方式的社会人口统计学相关性

W. Alghamdi, S. Alzahrani
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间沙特阿拉伯普通人群应对方式的社会人口统计学相关性","authors":"W. Alghamdi, S. Alzahrani","doi":"10.2174/2666082218666220610141635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between the different demographic variables and other social, and health-related factors, and the coping styles used by the general population in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\n\nA cross-sectional study involving 5,514 participants was conducted online over two weeks. An online questionnaire was distributed among attendees of a public awareness campaign. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: (1) sociodemographic variables and questions exploring the physical and mental health of the participants, along with COVID-19 related questions, and (2) the Brief COPE questionnaire to identify the coping styles used by participants.\n\n\n\nThe most frequently used adaptive styles involved religion, acceptance, and positive reframing. As for the maladaptive styles, self-distraction, venting, and self-blame were the most frequently used. Comparing the means of coping styles, participants older than 60 and female participants more frequently used religion, acceptance, positive reframing, and active coping, while participants younger than 35 and male participants reported more frequent use of instrumental support and humor. Younger participants used all maladaptive coping styles more frequently than older participants; male and female participants appeared to use different maladaptive coping styles. People with mental health conditions showed less frequent use of adaptive coping styles and more frequent use of maladaptive coping styles.\n\n\n\nThe findings of this study show that multiple sociodemographic and health variables such as age, gender, and the presence of mental health conditions may influence the type of coping styles people use during a crisis. These findings could offer a better understanding of how the general public is coping with this unique situation. This may help mental health care workers and public health officials provide appropriate support at both individual and general population levels during this pandemic.\n","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic correlates of coping styles among the general population in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"W. Alghamdi, S. Alzahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2666082218666220610141635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between the different demographic variables and other social, and health-related factors, and the coping styles used by the general population in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic.\\n\\n\\n\\nA cross-sectional study involving 5,514 participants was conducted online over two weeks. An online questionnaire was distributed among attendees of a public awareness campaign. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: (1) sociodemographic variables and questions exploring the physical and mental health of the participants, along with COVID-19 related questions, and (2) the Brief COPE questionnaire to identify the coping styles used by participants.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe most frequently used adaptive styles involved religion, acceptance, and positive reframing. As for the maladaptive styles, self-distraction, venting, and self-blame were the most frequently used. Comparing the means of coping styles, participants older than 60 and female participants more frequently used religion, acceptance, positive reframing, and active coping, while participants younger than 35 and male participants reported more frequent use of instrumental support and humor. Younger participants used all maladaptive coping styles more frequently than older participants; male and female participants appeared to use different maladaptive coping styles. People with mental health conditions showed less frequent use of adaptive coping styles and more frequent use of maladaptive coping styles.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe findings of this study show that multiple sociodemographic and health variables such as age, gender, and the presence of mental health conditions may influence the type of coping styles people use during a crisis. These findings could offer a better understanding of how the general public is coping with this unique situation. This may help mental health care workers and public health officials provide appropriate support at both individual and general population levels during this pandemic.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666082218666220610141635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666082218666220610141635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查不同人口统计变量与其他社会和健康相关因素之间的关系,以及沙特阿拉伯普通人群在COVID-19大流行期间使用的应对方式。一项涉及5514名参与者的横断面研究在线进行了两周。一份在线调查问卷在公众意识运动的参加者中分发。问卷由两部分组成:(1)社会人口学变量和探讨参与者身心健康的问题,以及与COVID-19相关的问题;(2)简要COPE问卷,以确定参与者使用的应对方式。最常用的适应方式包括宗教、接受和积极重构。至于适应不良的方式,自我分心、发泄和自责是最常见的。比较应对方式的方式,60岁以上的参与者和女性更频繁地使用宗教、接纳、积极重构和积极应对,而35岁以下的参与者和男性更频繁地使用工具性支持和幽默。年轻的参与者比年长的参与者更频繁地使用各种适应不良的应对方式;男性和女性参与者似乎使用不同的适应不良应对方式。有心理健康问题的人使用适应性应对方式的频率较低,而使用不适应应对方式的频率较高。这项研究的结果表明,多种社会人口和健康变量,如年龄、性别和精神健康状况的存在,可能会影响人们在危机中使用的应对方式的类型。这些发现可以让我们更好地理解公众是如何应对这种独特的情况的。这可能有助于精神卫生保健工作者和公共卫生官员在本次大流行期间在个人和一般人群层面提供适当的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sociodemographic correlates of coping styles among the general population in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the different demographic variables and other social, and health-related factors, and the coping styles used by the general population in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional study involving 5,514 participants was conducted online over two weeks. An online questionnaire was distributed among attendees of a public awareness campaign. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: (1) sociodemographic variables and questions exploring the physical and mental health of the participants, along with COVID-19 related questions, and (2) the Brief COPE questionnaire to identify the coping styles used by participants. The most frequently used adaptive styles involved religion, acceptance, and positive reframing. As for the maladaptive styles, self-distraction, venting, and self-blame were the most frequently used. Comparing the means of coping styles, participants older than 60 and female participants more frequently used religion, acceptance, positive reframing, and active coping, while participants younger than 35 and male participants reported more frequent use of instrumental support and humor. Younger participants used all maladaptive coping styles more frequently than older participants; male and female participants appeared to use different maladaptive coping styles. People with mental health conditions showed less frequent use of adaptive coping styles and more frequent use of maladaptive coping styles. The findings of this study show that multiple sociodemographic and health variables such as age, gender, and the presence of mental health conditions may influence the type of coping styles people use during a crisis. These findings could offer a better understanding of how the general public is coping with this unique situation. This may help mental health care workers and public health officials provide appropriate support at both individual and general population levels during this pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Bibliotherapy in Depression Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Psychosis and Neurosis: Main Differences and Impact on Life The Social Media Mirror: Understanding the Distortion of Eating Habits and Body Image in the Digital Age The Experience of Parents When they Find Out that their Child has Autism: A Phenomenological Study Revolutionizing Psychiatric Care: Unleashing the Potential of Augmented and Virtual Reality for Diagnosis and Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1