有机菌的抗真菌活性及其对木材耐腐性的影响

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 FORESTRY Wood and Fiber Science Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI:10.22382/wfs-2020-039
Aitor Barbero-López, Mokbul Hossain, A. Haapala
{"title":"有机菌的抗真菌活性及其对木材耐腐性的影响","authors":"Aitor Barbero-López, Mokbul Hossain, A. Haapala","doi":"10.22382/wfs-2020-039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic acids are present in many bio-based chemicals suggested as active ingredients for wood preservative formulations, but their effects in wood have not been studied. However, an understanding of their effect in wood is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine the antifungal and wood-preserving activities in vitro of acetic, formic, and propionic acids against the wood-decaying fungi  Coniophora puteana, Rhodonia (Poria) placenta, Gloeophyullum trabeum , and  Trametes versicolor . Mixes of these three acids were also tested for possible synergetic effects. All the acids and mixtures showed antifungal activity against the pure cultures of wood-decaying fungi. Propionic acid by itself had the best performance, inhibiting at 1 g/L concentration the growth of all the decay fungi by 99-100%. Despite the antifungal activity of the organic acids, the pine sapwood specimens treated with 3% and 6% acid solutions and exposed to decay by  C. Puteana  and  G. trabeum  did not differ significantly from the untreated pine. Leaching of the sapwood specimens caused an incremental mass loss of the sapwood specimens. In addition, the leached specimens had a lower mass than the specimens before the acid impregnation, indicating that they were damaged by the acidic chemicals. The presence and acidity of organic acids in wood-derived bio0-based chemicals need to be assessed before they are used as wood preservatives.","PeriodicalId":23620,"journal":{"name":"Wood and Fiber Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"410-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antifungal Activity of Organic Acies and Their Impact on Wood Decay Resistance\",\"authors\":\"Aitor Barbero-López, Mokbul Hossain, A. Haapala\",\"doi\":\"10.22382/wfs-2020-039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organic acids are present in many bio-based chemicals suggested as active ingredients for wood preservative formulations, but their effects in wood have not been studied. However, an understanding of their effect in wood is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine the antifungal and wood-preserving activities in vitro of acetic, formic, and propionic acids against the wood-decaying fungi  Coniophora puteana, Rhodonia (Poria) placenta, Gloeophyullum trabeum , and  Trametes versicolor . Mixes of these three acids were also tested for possible synergetic effects. All the acids and mixtures showed antifungal activity against the pure cultures of wood-decaying fungi. Propionic acid by itself had the best performance, inhibiting at 1 g/L concentration the growth of all the decay fungi by 99-100%. Despite the antifungal activity of the organic acids, the pine sapwood specimens treated with 3% and 6% acid solutions and exposed to decay by  C. Puteana  and  G. trabeum  did not differ significantly from the untreated pine. Leaching of the sapwood specimens caused an incremental mass loss of the sapwood specimens. In addition, the leached specimens had a lower mass than the specimens before the acid impregnation, indicating that they were damaged by the acidic chemicals. The presence and acidity of organic acids in wood-derived bio0-based chemicals need to be assessed before they are used as wood preservatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wood and Fiber Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"410-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wood and Fiber Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood and Fiber Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

有机酸存在于许多生物基化学品中,被认为是木材防腐配方的有效成分,但它们在木材中的作用尚未研究。然而,了解它们在木材中的作用是必要的。研究乙酸、甲酸和丙酸对腐木真菌松果菌(Coniophora puteana)、茯苓菌(Rhodonia Poria)、小叶球藻(Gloeophyullum trabeum)和花斑曲霉(Trametes versicolor)的抑菌和防腐作用。还测试了这三种酸的混合物可能的协同效应。所有酸和混合物对腐木真菌纯培养物均表现出抑菌活性。丙酸单用效果最好,在浓度为1 g/L时,对所有腐烂真菌的生长抑制率为99 ~ 100%。尽管有机酸有一定的抗真菌活性,但经3%和6%酸溶液处理的松材样品和经Puteana和G. trabeum腐烂的松材样品与未经处理的松材样品的抗真菌活性差异不显著。边材试样的浸出导致边材试样的质量损失逐渐增加。此外,浸出后的试样质量比酸浸前的试样质量小,说明浸出后的试样受到了酸性物质的破坏。在木材衍生的生物基化学品用作木材防腐剂之前,需要对其有机酸的存在和酸度进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antifungal Activity of Organic Acies and Their Impact on Wood Decay Resistance
Organic acids are present in many bio-based chemicals suggested as active ingredients for wood preservative formulations, but their effects in wood have not been studied. However, an understanding of their effect in wood is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine the antifungal and wood-preserving activities in vitro of acetic, formic, and propionic acids against the wood-decaying fungi  Coniophora puteana, Rhodonia (Poria) placenta, Gloeophyullum trabeum , and  Trametes versicolor . Mixes of these three acids were also tested for possible synergetic effects. All the acids and mixtures showed antifungal activity against the pure cultures of wood-decaying fungi. Propionic acid by itself had the best performance, inhibiting at 1 g/L concentration the growth of all the decay fungi by 99-100%. Despite the antifungal activity of the organic acids, the pine sapwood specimens treated with 3% and 6% acid solutions and exposed to decay by  C. Puteana  and  G. trabeum  did not differ significantly from the untreated pine. Leaching of the sapwood specimens caused an incremental mass loss of the sapwood specimens. In addition, the leached specimens had a lower mass than the specimens before the acid impregnation, indicating that they were damaged by the acidic chemicals. The presence and acidity of organic acids in wood-derived bio0-based chemicals need to be assessed before they are used as wood preservatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wood and Fiber Science
Wood and Fiber Science 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: W&FS SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES INCLUDE THESE TOPIC AREAS: -Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials- Biomaterials- Timber Structures and Engineering- Biology- Nano-technology- Natural Fiber Composites- Timber Treatment and Harvesting- Botany- Mycology- Adhesives and Bioresins- Business Management and Marketing- Operations Research. SWST members have access to all full-text electronic versions of current and past Wood and Fiber Science issues.
期刊最新文献
IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNIZATION OF BAMBOO BASED ON CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGES USING COMPUTER VISION Fiber Quality Prediction Using Nir Spectral Data: Tree-Based Ensemble Learning VS Deep Neural Networks PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT OF TASMANIAN PLANTATION EUCALYPTUS NITENS USING SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS Use of a Portable Near Infrared Spectrometer for Wood Identification of Four Dalbergia Species from Madagascar THE GLOBAL WOOD SPECIES PRIORITY LIST: A LIVING DATABASE OF TREE SPECIES MOST AT RISK FOR ILLEGAL LOGGING, UNSUSTAINABLE DEFORESTATION, AND HIGH RATES OF TRADE GLOBALLY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1