内镜下乳头状大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的疗效及预后

Yan-qin Chen, Peng Peng, B. Hou
{"title":"内镜下乳头状大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的疗效及预后","authors":"Yan-qin Chen, Peng Peng, B. Hou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the curative effect and prognosis of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 153 patients with choledocholithiasis (>1.0 cm in stone diameter) admitted and treated in Shanxi People′s Hospital from August 2016 to November 2017 were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table: the EPLBD group (n=83) and the small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation (ESLBD) group (n=70) . The success rate of stone removal, the rate of lithotripsy, and the incidence of short-term and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThere were no statistical differences between the EPLBD group and the ESLBD group in total stone removal rate [95.2% (79/83) VS 97.1% (68/70) , χ2=0.388, P=0.533] and one-time stone removal rate [92.8% (77/83) VS 90.0% (63/70) , χ2=0.375, P=0.540]. The lithotripsy rate between the two groups had no statistical difference [25.3% (21/83) VS 35.7% (25/70) , χ2=1.958, P=0.162]. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recent complications between the two groups [43.4% (36/83) VS 40.0% (28/70) , χ2=0.178, P=0.673]. No postoperative perforation was found in either group. The follow-up time was 22.7±4.3 months in the EPLBD group, and 20.8±6.3 months in the ESLBD group.The cumulative recurrent rate of choledocholithiasis in the two groups were 2.4% (2/83) and 15.7% (11/70) , respectively, and the difference was significant (P=0.003) . \n \n \nConclusion \nSimple EPLBD in the treatment of choledocholithiasis is equivalent to ESLBD in the success rate of stone removal, utilization rate of lithotripsy, and incidence of recent complications, but the long-term stone recurrence rate of EPLBD is lower than that of ESLBD. EPLBD is effective and safe on the treatment of choledocholithiasis. \n \n \nKey words: \nCholedocholithiasis; Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation; Small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"411-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curative effects and prognosis of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation on the treatment of choledocholithiasis\",\"authors\":\"Yan-qin Chen, Peng Peng, B. Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the curative effect and prognosis of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 153 patients with choledocholithiasis (>1.0 cm in stone diameter) admitted and treated in Shanxi People′s Hospital from August 2016 to November 2017 were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table: the EPLBD group (n=83) and the small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation (ESLBD) group (n=70) . The success rate of stone removal, the rate of lithotripsy, and the incidence of short-term and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were no statistical differences between the EPLBD group and the ESLBD group in total stone removal rate [95.2% (79/83) VS 97.1% (68/70) , χ2=0.388, P=0.533] and one-time stone removal rate [92.8% (77/83) VS 90.0% (63/70) , χ2=0.375, P=0.540]. The lithotripsy rate between the two groups had no statistical difference [25.3% (21/83) VS 35.7% (25/70) , χ2=1.958, P=0.162]. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recent complications between the two groups [43.4% (36/83) VS 40.0% (28/70) , χ2=0.178, P=0.673]. No postoperative perforation was found in either group. The follow-up time was 22.7±4.3 months in the EPLBD group, and 20.8±6.3 months in the ESLBD group.The cumulative recurrent rate of choledocholithiasis in the two groups were 2.4% (2/83) and 15.7% (11/70) , respectively, and the difference was significant (P=0.003) . \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nSimple EPLBD in the treatment of choledocholithiasis is equivalent to ESLBD in the success rate of stone removal, utilization rate of lithotripsy, and incidence of recent complications, but the long-term stone recurrence rate of EPLBD is lower than that of ESLBD. EPLBD is effective and safe on the treatment of choledocholithiasis. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCholedocholithiasis; Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation; Small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation\",\"PeriodicalId\":10072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"411-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.06.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.06.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价内镜乳头状大球囊扩张术(EPLBD)治疗胆总管结石的疗效和预后。方法根据随机数表,将2016年8月至2017年11月在山西省人民医院收治的153例胆总管结石(结石直径>1.0cm)患者随机分为两组:EPLBD组(n=83)和内镜小括约肌切开加大球囊扩张(ESLBD)组(n=70)。比较两组的结石清除成功率、碎石率以及短期和长期并发症的发生率。结果EPLBD组和ESLBD组的总结石清除率[95.2%(79/83)VS 97.1%(68/70),χ2=0.388,P=0.533]和一次性结石清除率[92.8%(77/83)VS 90.0%(63/70),χ0=0.375,P=0.540]无统计学差异两组近期并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(43.4%(36/83)VS 40.0%(28/70),χ2=0.178,P=0.673)。EPLBD组的随访时间为22.7±4.3个月,ESLBD组为20.8±6.3个月。两组胆总管结石累计复发率分别为2.4%(2/83)和15.7%(11/70),差异有统计学意义(P=0.003),但EPLBD的长期结石复发率低于ESLBD。EPLBD治疗胆总管结石安全有效。关键词:胆总管综合征;胰胆管造影,内镜逆行;内镜乳头状大球囊扩张术;小内镜乳头括约肌切开术加大球囊扩张术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Curative effects and prognosis of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation on the treatment of choledocholithiasis
Objective To evaluate the curative effect and prognosis of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Methods A total of 153 patients with choledocholithiasis (>1.0 cm in stone diameter) admitted and treated in Shanxi People′s Hospital from August 2016 to November 2017 were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table: the EPLBD group (n=83) and the small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation (ESLBD) group (n=70) . The success rate of stone removal, the rate of lithotripsy, and the incidence of short-term and long-term complications were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistical differences between the EPLBD group and the ESLBD group in total stone removal rate [95.2% (79/83) VS 97.1% (68/70) , χ2=0.388, P=0.533] and one-time stone removal rate [92.8% (77/83) VS 90.0% (63/70) , χ2=0.375, P=0.540]. The lithotripsy rate between the two groups had no statistical difference [25.3% (21/83) VS 35.7% (25/70) , χ2=1.958, P=0.162]. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of recent complications between the two groups [43.4% (36/83) VS 40.0% (28/70) , χ2=0.178, P=0.673]. No postoperative perforation was found in either group. The follow-up time was 22.7±4.3 months in the EPLBD group, and 20.8±6.3 months in the ESLBD group.The cumulative recurrent rate of choledocholithiasis in the two groups were 2.4% (2/83) and 15.7% (11/70) , respectively, and the difference was significant (P=0.003) . Conclusion Simple EPLBD in the treatment of choledocholithiasis is equivalent to ESLBD in the success rate of stone removal, utilization rate of lithotripsy, and incidence of recent complications, but the long-term stone recurrence rate of EPLBD is lower than that of ESLBD. EPLBD is effective and safe on the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Key words: Choledocholithiasis; Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation; Small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilatation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7555
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience. The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications. The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of cirrhosis patients with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding by three scoring systems Effects of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophageal motility in patients with achalasia Efficacy of hemostatic powder on preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery on treatment of early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma Clinical, endoscopic and pathological features of early Barrett esophageal adenocarcinoma and its treatment efficacy by endoscopic submucosal dissection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1