为什么雇主的灵活性对残疾工人的招聘、保留和发展至关重要

IF 1.9 2区社会学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability & Society Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1080/09687599.2023.2168180

Cara Molyneux

{"title":"为什么雇主的灵活性对残疾工人的招聘、保留和发展至关重要","authors":"Cara Molyneux","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2023.2168180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article outlines recent debates in the UK on the requirement to enhance all employees’ rights to request Flexible Working by making it the default position. I consider if, and how, this change could be beneficial for disabled people when competing against non-disabled people for good quality jobs.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"723 - 728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why employer inflexibility matters for the recruitment, retention and progression of disabled workers\",\"authors\":\"Cara Molyneux\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09687599.2023.2168180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article outlines recent debates in the UK on the requirement to enhance all employees’ rights to request Flexible Working by making it the default position. I consider if, and how, this change could be beneficial for disabled people when competing against non-disabled people for good quality jobs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability & Society\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"723 - 728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2168180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2168180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文概述了最近在英国关于通过将弹性工作作为默认位置来增强所有员工要求弹性工作的权利的要求的辩论。我考虑的是，当残疾人与非残疾人竞争高质量的工作时，这种变化是否以及如何对残疾人有利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Why employer inflexibility matters for the recruitment, retention and progression of disabled workers

Abstract This article outlines recent debates in the UK on the requirement to enhance all employees’ rights to request Flexible Working by making it the default position. I consider if, and how, this change could be beneficial for disabled people when competing against non-disabled people for good quality jobs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Disability & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

109