解剖鼻烟壶介入心脏病学:炒作还是希望?

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_12_23
E. Thirumurugan
{"title":"解剖鼻烟壶介入心脏病学:炒作还是希望?","authors":"E. Thirumurugan","doi":"10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_12_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiovascular catheterization has traditionally been done through transradial access. Vascular complications, primarily radial artery (RA) occlusion, continue to exist despite their rarity. In recent times, interventionalists have reported using the anatomical snuffbox (ASB) or distal transradial approach for cardiac catheterization. This distal radial approach has been promoted to lower the risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications as well as RA occlusion at the forearm. This state-of-the-art review outlines the feasibility and safety of left versus right ASB in interventional cardiology.","PeriodicalId":17503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical snuffbox for interventional cardiology: Hype or hope?\",\"authors\":\"E. Thirumurugan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_12_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiovascular catheterization has traditionally been done through transradial access. Vascular complications, primarily radial artery (RA) occlusion, continue to exist despite their rarity. In recent times, interventionalists have reported using the anatomical snuffbox (ASB) or distal transradial approach for cardiac catheterization. This distal radial approach has been promoted to lower the risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications as well as RA occlusion at the forearm. This state-of-the-art review outlines the feasibility and safety of left versus right ASB in interventional cardiology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_12_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_12_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,心血管导管置入是通过经桡动脉通路进行的。血管并发症,主要是桡动脉(RA)闭塞,继续存在,尽管他们的罕见。近年来,介入医师报道使用解剖鼻烟壶(ASB)或远端经桡动脉入路进行心导管插管。桡骨远端入路已被推广,以降低出血和血管通路并发症以及前臂RA闭塞的风险。这篇最新的综述概述了左ASB与右ASB在介入心脏病学中的可行性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomical snuffbox for interventional cardiology: Hype or hope?
Cardiovascular catheterization has traditionally been done through transradial access. Vascular complications, primarily radial artery (RA) occlusion, continue to exist despite their rarity. In recent times, interventionalists have reported using the anatomical snuffbox (ASB) or distal transradial approach for cardiac catheterization. This distal radial approach has been promoted to lower the risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications as well as RA occlusion at the forearm. This state-of-the-art review outlines the feasibility and safety of left versus right ASB in interventional cardiology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Venous thromboembolism and cardiopulmonary involvement in Covid 2019 patients: A retrospective observational study Aspirin strategy for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: A narrative review Acute coronary syndrome in young (≤45 years) patients: An observational study Radial artery pseudoaneurysm following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention Authors should be held responsible for artificial intelligence hallucinations and mistakes in their papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1