古城的生与死:自然史

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Journal of the American Planning Association Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1080/01944363.2023.2174756
M. Teitz, Catherine Teitz
{"title":"古城的生与死:自然史","authors":"M. Teitz, Catherine Teitz","doi":"10.1080/01944363.2023.2174756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"als, internal building systems, and allowable innovations are decided by standards organizations, code development bodies, and state and federal legislatures, leaving the designer with a very limited scope for shaping each individual building. The implication is that innovators need to devote effort to the shared project of predesign and not only to their individual design commissions. Otherwise, many of the most meaningful design choices will remain with the marketers, financiers, and insurers. This is familiar territory for planners more so than for architects. The book’s content and message are sound, but several omissions are puzzling. First, there is little use of relevant social science regarding the logics of federalism, the processes of political agenda setting, the emergence of social movements, and the reconfiguring of social practices. Thus, the book’s tone is inductive and somewhat disconnected from established social theory. Second, there is little discussion of the innovation diffusion process and how early adopters respond to different incentives and rules than late adopters. The policy discussion suffers as a result. Third, there is little comparative discussion to contrast the home building industry with other industries in terms of capital intensiveness, durability of product, liquidity of market, and other factors known to drive the potential pace of innovation. The resulting slow rate of innovation might actually be preferable for most people. Fourth, the building occupant is treated mostly as an exogenous factor that undermines designs, rather than as an active player in the drama. These omissions detract from the book’s authority but not from its contribution, which is to focus reformers’ attention on the predesign arena where the interested parties make key sustainability and resilience decisions. The historical narrative and many anecdotes effectively make this case.","PeriodicalId":48248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Planning Association","volume":"89 1","pages":"407 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Life and Death of Ancient Cities: A Natural History\",\"authors\":\"M. Teitz, Catherine Teitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01944363.2023.2174756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"als, internal building systems, and allowable innovations are decided by standards organizations, code development bodies, and state and federal legislatures, leaving the designer with a very limited scope for shaping each individual building. The implication is that innovators need to devote effort to the shared project of predesign and not only to their individual design commissions. Otherwise, many of the most meaningful design choices will remain with the marketers, financiers, and insurers. This is familiar territory for planners more so than for architects. The book’s content and message are sound, but several omissions are puzzling. First, there is little use of relevant social science regarding the logics of federalism, the processes of political agenda setting, the emergence of social movements, and the reconfiguring of social practices. Thus, the book’s tone is inductive and somewhat disconnected from established social theory. Second, there is little discussion of the innovation diffusion process and how early adopters respond to different incentives and rules than late adopters. The policy discussion suffers as a result. Third, there is little comparative discussion to contrast the home building industry with other industries in terms of capital intensiveness, durability of product, liquidity of market, and other factors known to drive the potential pace of innovation. The resulting slow rate of innovation might actually be preferable for most people. Fourth, the building occupant is treated mostly as an exogenous factor that undermines designs, rather than as an active player in the drama. These omissions detract from the book’s authority but not from its contribution, which is to focus reformers’ attention on the predesign arena where the interested parties make key sustainability and resilience decisions. The historical narrative and many anecdotes effectively make this case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Planning Association\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Planning Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2174756\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Planning Association","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2174756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

als、内部建筑系统和允许的创新是由标准组织、规范开发机构、州和联邦立法机构决定的,设计师塑造每一栋建筑的空间非常有限。这意味着创新者需要致力于共同的预先设计项目,而不仅仅是他们各自的设计委托。否则,许多最有意义的设计选择将留给营销人员、金融家和保险公司。对于规划者来说,这是一个熟悉的领域,而对于建筑师来说更是如此。这本书的内容和信息都很好,但有几处疏漏令人费解。首先,在联邦制的逻辑、政治议程的制定过程、社会运动的出现和社会实践的重新配置方面,很少使用相关的社会科学。因此,这本书的基调是归纳的,与既定的社会理论有些脱节。其次,很少讨论创新扩散过程,以及早期采用者与晚期采用者如何应对不同的激励和规则。因此,政策讨论受到影响。第三,在资本密集度、产品耐用性、市场流动性和其他已知驱动潜在创新步伐的因素方面,很少有比较讨论将家居建筑行业与其他行业进行对比。由此产生的缓慢的创新速度实际上可能对大多数人来说更可取。第四,建筑居住者大多被视为破坏设计的外生因素,而不是戏剧中的积极参与者。这些遗漏削弱了本书的权威性,但并没有削弱其贡献,即改革者将注意力集中在预先设计的舞台上,在这个舞台上,利益相关方做出关键的可持续性和韧性决策。历史叙述和许多轶事有效地证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Life and Death of Ancient Cities: A Natural History
als, internal building systems, and allowable innovations are decided by standards organizations, code development bodies, and state and federal legislatures, leaving the designer with a very limited scope for shaping each individual building. The implication is that innovators need to devote effort to the shared project of predesign and not only to their individual design commissions. Otherwise, many of the most meaningful design choices will remain with the marketers, financiers, and insurers. This is familiar territory for planners more so than for architects. The book’s content and message are sound, but several omissions are puzzling. First, there is little use of relevant social science regarding the logics of federalism, the processes of political agenda setting, the emergence of social movements, and the reconfiguring of social practices. Thus, the book’s tone is inductive and somewhat disconnected from established social theory. Second, there is little discussion of the innovation diffusion process and how early adopters respond to different incentives and rules than late adopters. The policy discussion suffers as a result. Third, there is little comparative discussion to contrast the home building industry with other industries in terms of capital intensiveness, durability of product, liquidity of market, and other factors known to drive the potential pace of innovation. The resulting slow rate of innovation might actually be preferable for most people. Fourth, the building occupant is treated mostly as an exogenous factor that undermines designs, rather than as an active player in the drama. These omissions detract from the book’s authority but not from its contribution, which is to focus reformers’ attention on the predesign arena where the interested parties make key sustainability and resilience decisions. The historical narrative and many anecdotes effectively make this case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, the quarterly Journal of the American Planning Association (JAPA) has published research, commentaries, and book reviews useful to practicing planners, policymakers, scholars, students, and citizens of urban, suburban, and rural areas. JAPA publishes only peer-reviewed, original research and analysis. It aspires to bring insight to planning the future, to air a variety of perspectives, to publish the highest quality work, and to engage readers.
期刊最新文献
Housing Precarity in Six European and North American Cities: Threatened by the Loss of a Safe, Stable, and Affordable Home Navigating Cultural Difference in Planning: How Cross-Border Adaptation Nurtured Cosmopolitan Competence Among U.S.-Taught Chinese Practitioners Food Access After Disasters The Changing American Neighborhood: The Meaning of Place in the Twenty-First Century The Changing American Neighborhood Alan Mallach and Todd Swanstrom (2023). Cornell University Press, 396 pages. $31.95 (paperback) Welcome to the New Editorial Group
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1