病灶内富血小板血浆注射与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的比较研究

Naman Goel, Jatin Talwar, Sarang Agarwal, Loveneesh G. Krishna, Ashish Rustagi
{"title":"病灶内富血小板血浆注射与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎的比较研究","authors":"Naman Goel,&nbsp;Jatin Talwar,&nbsp;Sarang Agarwal,&nbsp;Loveneesh G. Krishna,&nbsp;Ashish Rustagi","doi":"10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Plantar Fasciitis<span><span> is a widely prevalent condition and is extremely disabling if it remains unresolved. Despite many available treatment modalities, the management of recalcitrant cases is still a dilemma. We conducted this study to evaluate and compare the role of two novel modalities: Intralesional PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) injection and </span>Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) for the management of this condition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>60 patients with a clinical diagnosis of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were randomized into 2 groups; PRP Group (n = 30) and ESWT Group (n = 30). In PRP group patients received 3 intralesional injections<span> of PRP and in ESWT group 3 sessions of Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy were administered. The Primary outcome measures were Visual Analogue Scale<span> (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Roles and Maudsley Index and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI). The secondary outcome measures were complications. The patients were followed up for a period of 6 months and evaluated for various scores.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 6 months follow-up, significant results were found only on VAS score for both groups (p-value &lt;0.05). However, both modalities resulted in significant clinical improvement with no complications reported. No statistically significant differences were reported between the two test groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both autologous PRP and ESWT can become extremely useful modalities for management of recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis with no known adverse effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study between intralesional platelet rich plasma injection and extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis\",\"authors\":\"Naman Goel,&nbsp;Jatin Talwar,&nbsp;Sarang Agarwal,&nbsp;Loveneesh G. Krishna,&nbsp;Ashish Rustagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Plantar Fasciitis<span><span> is a widely prevalent condition and is extremely disabling if it remains unresolved. Despite many available treatment modalities, the management of recalcitrant cases is still a dilemma. We conducted this study to evaluate and compare the role of two novel modalities: Intralesional PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) injection and </span>Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) for the management of this condition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>60 patients with a clinical diagnosis of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were randomized into 2 groups; PRP Group (n = 30) and ESWT Group (n = 30). In PRP group patients received 3 intralesional injections<span> of PRP and in ESWT group 3 sessions of Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy were administered. The Primary outcome measures were Visual Analogue Scale<span> (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Roles and Maudsley Index and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI). The secondary outcome measures were complications. The patients were followed up for a period of 6 months and evaluated for various scores.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 6 months follow-up, significant results were found only on VAS score for both groups (p-value &lt;0.05). However, both modalities resulted in significant clinical improvement with no complications reported. No statistically significant differences were reported between the two test groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both autologous PRP and ESWT can become extremely useful modalities for management of recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis with no known adverse effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.003\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214963521000407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214963521000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的足底筋膜炎是一种广泛流行的疾病,如果不加以解决,将导致严重的致残。尽管有许多可用的治疗方式,难治性病例的管理仍然是一个难题。我们进行了这项研究,以评估和比较两种新型治疗方式的作用:病灶内PRP(富血小板血浆)注射和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)。方法60例临床诊断为顽固性足底筋膜炎的患者随机分为2组;PRP组(n = 30)和ESWT组(n = 30)。PRP组患者接受3次局内PRP注射,ESWT组患者接受3次体外冲击波治疗。主要观察指标为视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分、Roles and Maudsley指数和跟部压痛指数(HTI)。次要结局指标为并发症。对患者进行为期6个月的随访,并进行各项评分。结果随访6个月,两组仅VAS评分有显著差异(p值<0.05)。然而,两种治疗方式均有显著的临床改善,无并发症报道。两组间无统计学差异。结论自体PRP和ESWT均可成为治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的有效方法,且无已知的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study between intralesional platelet rich plasma injection and extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Purpose

Plantar Fasciitis is a widely prevalent condition and is extremely disabling if it remains unresolved. Despite many available treatment modalities, the management of recalcitrant cases is still a dilemma. We conducted this study to evaluate and compare the role of two novel modalities: Intralesional PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) injection and Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) for the management of this condition.

Methods

60 patients with a clinical diagnosis of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were randomized into 2 groups; PRP Group (n = 30) and ESWT Group (n = 30). In PRP group patients received 3 intralesional injections of PRP and in ESWT group 3 sessions of Extra Corporeal Shockwave Therapy were administered. The Primary outcome measures were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Roles and Maudsley Index and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI). The secondary outcome measures were complications. The patients were followed up for a period of 6 months and evaluated for various scores.

Results

At 6 months follow-up, significant results were found only on VAS score for both groups (p-value <0.05). However, both modalities resulted in significant clinical improvement with no complications reported. No statistically significant differences were reported between the two test groups.

Conclusions

Both autologous PRP and ESWT can become extremely useful modalities for management of recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis with no known adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (JAJS) is committed to bring forth scientific manuscripts in the form of original research articles, current concept reviews, meta-analyses, case reports and letters to the editor. The focus of the Journal is to present wide-ranging, multi-disciplinary perspectives on the problems of the joints that are amenable with Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Though Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty entail surgical procedures, the Journal shall not restrict itself to these purely surgical procedures and will also encompass pharmacological, rehabilitative and physical measures that can prevent or postpone the execution of a surgical procedure. The Journal will also publish scientific research related to tissues other than joints that would ultimately have an effect on the joint function.
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopically Assisted Technique in the Treatment of Ankle Fractures with Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Adults Trabecular Metal Augments for Reconstruction of Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Replacement: Short-Term Outcomes Is Arthroscopic Management of Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip Enough? Short-Term Results after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Functional and Radiological Outcomes of a Newly Introduced Modified Manual Cementation Technique Versus Second-Generation Technique in Primary Cemented Hip Arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1