基于深度学习和改进模型预测控制的插电式混合动力汽车能量管理策略

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2023-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2023.126772
Xilei Sun, Jianqin Fu, Huiyong Yang, Mingke Xie, Jingping Liu
{"title":"基于深度学习和改进模型预测控制的插电式混合动力汽车能量管理策略","authors":"Xilei Sun,&nbsp;Jianqin Fu,&nbsp;Huiyong Yang,&nbsp;Mingke Xie,&nbsp;Jingping Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2023.126772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to reasonably allocate the power needs and manage the energy of the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) more efficiently, an energy management<span><span> strategy (EMS) based on deep learning and improved </span>model predictive control<span> was proposed. Firstly, the vehicle energy flow test was carried out for the PHEV, and the multi-physics (mechanical-electrical-thermal-hydraulic) model was constructed and validated. Secondly, six prediction models were built based on different algorithms and the effects were compared and analyzed in detail. Finally, a long short-term memory based improved model predictive control algorithm (LSTM-IMPC) was developed, and the effects of three EMSs based on the charge-depleting charge-sustaining rule (CD-CS), dynamic programming (DP) and LSTM-IMPC were investigated under Worldwide Light-duty Test Cycle (WLTC), New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and real driving cycle (RDC). The results show that the fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS under these three cycles are respectively 3.81%, 5.6% and 18.71% compared with the CD-CS-based EMS, which prove the good fuel-saving performance and strong robustness of the proposed EMS. The fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS are close to the DP-based EMS, which are the global optimal under these three cycles.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on deep learning and improved model predictive control\",\"authors\":\"Xilei Sun,&nbsp;Jianqin Fu,&nbsp;Huiyong Yang,&nbsp;Mingke Xie,&nbsp;Jingping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2023.126772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In order to reasonably allocate the power needs and manage the energy of the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) more efficiently, an energy management<span><span> strategy (EMS) based on deep learning and improved </span>model predictive control<span> was proposed. Firstly, the vehicle energy flow test was carried out for the PHEV, and the multi-physics (mechanical-electrical-thermal-hydraulic) model was constructed and validated. Secondly, six prediction models were built based on different algorithms and the effects were compared and analyzed in detail. Finally, a long short-term memory based improved model predictive control algorithm (LSTM-IMPC) was developed, and the effects of three EMSs based on the charge-depleting charge-sustaining rule (CD-CS), dynamic programming (DP) and LSTM-IMPC were investigated under Worldwide Light-duty Test Cycle (WLTC), New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and real driving cycle (RDC). The results show that the fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS under these three cycles are respectively 3.81%, 5.6% and 18.71% compared with the CD-CS-based EMS, which prove the good fuel-saving performance and strong robustness of the proposed EMS. The fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS are close to the DP-based EMS, which are the global optimal under these three cycles.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223001664\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223001664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

为了更有效地分配插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)的动力需求和能量管理,提出了一种基于深度学习和改进模型预测控制的插电式混合动力汽车能量管理策略(EMS)。首先,对插电式混合动力汽车进行整车能量流测试,建立并验证了多物理场(机-电-热-液)模型。其次,建立了基于不同算法的6种预测模型,并对预测效果进行了详细的对比分析;最后,提出了一种基于长短期记忆的改进模型预测控制算法(LSTM-IMPC),并在世界轻型汽车测试周期(WLTC)、新欧洲驾驶周期(NEDC)和真实驾驶周期(RDC)下,研究了基于耗尽电荷保持规则(CD-CS)、动态规划(DP)和LSTM-IMPC的3种EMSs的效果。结果表明,与基于cd - cs的EMS相比,基于lstm - impc的EMS在3个循环下的节油率分别为3.81%、5.6%和18.71%,证明了所提出的EMS具有良好的节油性能和较强的鲁棒性。基于lstm - impc的EMS节油率与基于dp的EMS节油率接近,在这3个循环下均为全局最优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on deep learning and improved model predictive control

In order to reasonably allocate the power needs and manage the energy of the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) more efficiently, an energy management strategy (EMS) based on deep learning and improved model predictive control was proposed. Firstly, the vehicle energy flow test was carried out for the PHEV, and the multi-physics (mechanical-electrical-thermal-hydraulic) model was constructed and validated. Secondly, six prediction models were built based on different algorithms and the effects were compared and analyzed in detail. Finally, a long short-term memory based improved model predictive control algorithm (LSTM-IMPC) was developed, and the effects of three EMSs based on the charge-depleting charge-sustaining rule (CD-CS), dynamic programming (DP) and LSTM-IMPC were investigated under Worldwide Light-duty Test Cycle (WLTC), New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and real driving cycle (RDC). The results show that the fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS under these three cycles are respectively 3.81%, 5.6% and 18.71% compared with the CD-CS-based EMS, which prove the good fuel-saving performance and strong robustness of the proposed EMS. The fuel-saving rates of the LSTM-IMPC-based EMS are close to the DP-based EMS, which are the global optimal under these three cycles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Multi-objective optimization and off-design performance analysis on the ammonia-water cooling-power/heating-power integrated system Global economic policy uncertainty and oil price uncertainty: Which is more important for global economic activity? In-situ ash sintering process analysis during the co-combustion of the coal gasification fine slag and corn straw Numerical study on the geomechanical responses in the Jilin Oilfield CO2-EOR and CGS projects in China Study on the impacts of injection parameters on knocking in HPDI natural gas engine at different combustion modes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1