民族志、方法自主和自我表征空间:千禧一代穆斯林青年的反射

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethnography and Education Pub Date : 2021-06-06 DOI:10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287
Máirtín Mac an Ghaill, C. Haywood
{"title":"民族志、方法自主和自我表征空间:千禧一代穆斯林青年的反射","authors":"Máirtín Mac an Ghaill, C. Haywood","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Within British schools over the last few decades, we have witnessed a policy move from multi-culturalism to counter-radicalization. In response, this article examines an ethnographic project that illustrates both the relative autonomy of methodology from broader theoretical and substantive questions, as well as the internal creative logic of methodology grounded in the research process. Importantly, the research participants claimed, in contrast to the securitised regime that circumscribed their lives as a ‘suspect community’ closing down critical discussion in the public sphere, their (ethnographic) engagement in the field enabled them to inhabit alternative representational spaces to the dominant public framing of young Muslims as dangerous men. Ethnography, with its attendant immersion research methods, created the time and space to open up complex explorations of the research participants’ emerging understandings, meanings and performances of school life for their generation.","PeriodicalId":46203,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography and Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"457 - 474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnography, methodological autonomy and self-representational space: a reflexive millennial generation of Muslim young men\",\"authors\":\"Máirtín Mac an Ghaill, C. Haywood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Within British schools over the last few decades, we have witnessed a policy move from multi-culturalism to counter-radicalization. In response, this article examines an ethnographic project that illustrates both the relative autonomy of methodology from broader theoretical and substantive questions, as well as the internal creative logic of methodology grounded in the research process. Importantly, the research participants claimed, in contrast to the securitised regime that circumscribed their lives as a ‘suspect community’ closing down critical discussion in the public sphere, their (ethnographic) engagement in the field enabled them to inhabit alternative representational spaces to the dominant public framing of young Muslims as dangerous men. Ethnography, with its attendant immersion research methods, created the time and space to open up complex explorations of the research participants’ emerging understandings, meanings and performances of school life for their generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"457 - 474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1935287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在过去的几十年里,我们见证了英国学校从多元文化主义到反激进化的政策转变。作为回应,本文考察了一个民族志项目,该项目说明了方法论在更广泛的理论和实质性问题中的相对自主性,以及基于研究过程的方法论的内部创造性逻辑。重要的是,研究参与者声称,与将他们的生活限制为“可疑社区”的证券化制度关闭了公共领域的批判性讨论相比,他们在该领域的(人种学)参与使他们能够居住在替代代表空间,而不是主流的公众将年轻穆斯林视为危险人物。民族志及其伴随的沉浸式研究方法创造了时间和空间,为研究参与者对他们这一代人的学校生活的新理解、意义和表现开辟了复杂的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethnography, methodological autonomy and self-representational space: a reflexive millennial generation of Muslim young men
ABSTRACT Within British schools over the last few decades, we have witnessed a policy move from multi-culturalism to counter-radicalization. In response, this article examines an ethnographic project that illustrates both the relative autonomy of methodology from broader theoretical and substantive questions, as well as the internal creative logic of methodology grounded in the research process. Importantly, the research participants claimed, in contrast to the securitised regime that circumscribed their lives as a ‘suspect community’ closing down critical discussion in the public sphere, their (ethnographic) engagement in the field enabled them to inhabit alternative representational spaces to the dominant public framing of young Muslims as dangerous men. Ethnography, with its attendant immersion research methods, created the time and space to open up complex explorations of the research participants’ emerging understandings, meanings and performances of school life for their generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnography and Education
Ethnography and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Ethnography and Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles that illuminate educational practices through empirical methodologies, which prioritise the experiences and perspectives of those involved. The journal is open to a wide range of ethnographic research that emanates from the perspectives of sociology, linguistics, history, psychology and general educational studies as well as anthropology. The journal’s priority is to support ethnographic research that involves long-term engagement with those studied in order to understand their cultures, uses multiple methods of generating data, and recognises the centrality of the researcher in the research process. The journal welcomes substantive and methodological articles that seek to explicate and challenge the effects of educational policies and practices; interrogate and develop theories about educational structures, policies and experiences; highlight the agency of educational actors; and provide accounts of how the everyday practices of those engaged in education are instrumental in social reproduction.
期刊最新文献
Ethical dilemmas of translanguaging pedagogy in L2 and basic literacy education for adults: social justice and ethics of care Playing the ‘pibe chorro’ game: masculine skills and legitimate peripheral participation in street culture ‘What’s he writing in there?’ Reciprocal field relations and relational curiosity in ethnographies of education Student voices in creative teaching practices with digital media: a meta-ethnographic research Is there room for interculturality? Indigenous youth in Peruvian private universities and the scholarship programme Beca 18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1