编者按语

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Collection Management Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/01462679.2022.2030096
Judith M. Nixon, Cara List
{"title":"编者按语","authors":"Judith M. Nixon, Cara List","doi":"10.1080/01462679.2022.2030096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As collection management librarians, our responsibilities, in a nutshell, are to buy the books/journals/databases, etc., to organize them, and to evaluate them for retention – always with our users’ needs in mind. This issue, like most of our issues, deals with these. However, another important aspect of acquiring is working with gifts and donors. And we also have an article on donor relations. This issue of Collection Management begins with three peer-reviewed articles that are case studies. Therefore, each looks at how an individual library handled a collection project. The first two address the collection evaluation process of downsizing projects. Zachary Valdes, at Sam Houston State University, describes his library’s methods and workflow in moving library materials to the Texas A&M Joint Library Facility. Those libraries considering consolidating collections into joint repositories will want to read the challenges and successes of this case study. The second article also addresses the evaluation process, this time evaluation of subscription databases. Summer Durrant’s article goes beyond just looking at “cost per use” statistics and describes an evaluation grid used at the University of Mary Washington Libraries to assess the more holistic value of the databases to their users. The third article will be of interest to libraries using Kanopy to provide streaming videos. Because Kanopy has two major access models, Sandra Urban’s library investigated which model to choose. They choose the mediate access model and found that this has not led to significant delays in providing access to requested materials. The fourth peer-reviewed article is on the important aspect of acquiring materials, donor relations. Alison Day and Maja Krtalić looked at the donor relationships at five New Zealand galleries, libraries, archives and museums institutions. The author interviewed nine participants to study the policies and procedures related to donors. The issue concludes with a non-peer reviewed article in our “Tools of the Trade” column. This article is also a case study on weeding. Adrienne Hieb and Sian Seldin describe weeding the government documents collection at the Research Library at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.","PeriodicalId":43910,"journal":{"name":"Collection Management","volume":"47 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Note\",\"authors\":\"Judith M. Nixon, Cara List\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01462679.2022.2030096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As collection management librarians, our responsibilities, in a nutshell, are to buy the books/journals/databases, etc., to organize them, and to evaluate them for retention – always with our users’ needs in mind. This issue, like most of our issues, deals with these. However, another important aspect of acquiring is working with gifts and donors. And we also have an article on donor relations. This issue of Collection Management begins with three peer-reviewed articles that are case studies. Therefore, each looks at how an individual library handled a collection project. The first two address the collection evaluation process of downsizing projects. Zachary Valdes, at Sam Houston State University, describes his library’s methods and workflow in moving library materials to the Texas A&M Joint Library Facility. Those libraries considering consolidating collections into joint repositories will want to read the challenges and successes of this case study. The second article also addresses the evaluation process, this time evaluation of subscription databases. Summer Durrant’s article goes beyond just looking at “cost per use” statistics and describes an evaluation grid used at the University of Mary Washington Libraries to assess the more holistic value of the databases to their users. The third article will be of interest to libraries using Kanopy to provide streaming videos. Because Kanopy has two major access models, Sandra Urban’s library investigated which model to choose. They choose the mediate access model and found that this has not led to significant delays in providing access to requested materials. The fourth peer-reviewed article is on the important aspect of acquiring materials, donor relations. Alison Day and Maja Krtalić looked at the donor relationships at five New Zealand galleries, libraries, archives and museums institutions. The author interviewed nine participants to study the policies and procedures related to donors. The issue concludes with a non-peer reviewed article in our “Tools of the Trade” column. This article is also a case study on weeding. Adrienne Hieb and Sian Seldin describe weeding the government documents collection at the Research Library at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collection Management\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collection Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2022.2030096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2022.2030096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为馆藏管理馆员,简而言之,我们的职责是购买图书/期刊/数据库等,组织它们,并评估它们的保留情况——始终牢记用户的需求。这个问题,像我们的大多数问题一样,涉及这些问题。然而,收购的另一个重要方面是与礼物和捐赠者合作。我们也有一篇关于捐赠者关系的文章。本期《收藏管理》以三篇同行评议的案例文章开始。因此,每个都着眼于单个库如何处理集合项目。前两项涉及精简项目的收集评估过程。萨姆休斯顿州立大学的Zachary Valdes描述了他的图书馆将图书馆资料转移到德克萨斯农工大学联合图书馆设施的方法和工作流程。那些考虑将集合合并到联合存储库中的图书馆将希望阅读本案例研究的挑战和成功。第二篇文章还讨论了评估过程,这次是对订阅数据库的评估。Summer Durrant的文章不仅仅关注“每次使用成本”统计数据,还描述了玛丽华盛顿大学图书馆使用的评估网格,以评估数据库对用户的整体价值。第三篇文章将会让使用Kanopy提供流视频的图书馆感兴趣。因为Kanopy有两种主要的访问模型,Sandra Urban的图书馆研究了该选择哪种模型。他们选择了中间访问模型,并发现这在提供对所请求材料的访问方面没有导致严重的延迟。第四篇同行评议的文章是关于获取材料的重要方面,捐赠者关系。Alison Day和Maja krtaliki研究了新西兰五家画廊、图书馆、档案馆和博物馆机构的捐赠者关系。作者采访了9位参与者,研究了与捐助者有关的政策和程序。本期以我们的“行业工具”专栏中一篇未经同行评议的文章作为结束语。这篇文章也是一个关于除草的案例研究。Adrienne Hieb和Sian Seldin描述了在华盛顿特区联邦储备系统理事会研究图书馆清理政府文件的过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial Note
As collection management librarians, our responsibilities, in a nutshell, are to buy the books/journals/databases, etc., to organize them, and to evaluate them for retention – always with our users’ needs in mind. This issue, like most of our issues, deals with these. However, another important aspect of acquiring is working with gifts and donors. And we also have an article on donor relations. This issue of Collection Management begins with three peer-reviewed articles that are case studies. Therefore, each looks at how an individual library handled a collection project. The first two address the collection evaluation process of downsizing projects. Zachary Valdes, at Sam Houston State University, describes his library’s methods and workflow in moving library materials to the Texas A&M Joint Library Facility. Those libraries considering consolidating collections into joint repositories will want to read the challenges and successes of this case study. The second article also addresses the evaluation process, this time evaluation of subscription databases. Summer Durrant’s article goes beyond just looking at “cost per use” statistics and describes an evaluation grid used at the University of Mary Washington Libraries to assess the more holistic value of the databases to their users. The third article will be of interest to libraries using Kanopy to provide streaming videos. Because Kanopy has two major access models, Sandra Urban’s library investigated which model to choose. They choose the mediate access model and found that this has not led to significant delays in providing access to requested materials. The fourth peer-reviewed article is on the important aspect of acquiring materials, donor relations. Alison Day and Maja Krtalić looked at the donor relationships at five New Zealand galleries, libraries, archives and museums institutions. The author interviewed nine participants to study the policies and procedures related to donors. The issue concludes with a non-peer reviewed article in our “Tools of the Trade” column. This article is also a case study on weeding. Adrienne Hieb and Sian Seldin describe weeding the government documents collection at the Research Library at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collection Management
Collection Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
44.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The management and development of library collections is constantly evolving. Collection Management is the essential refereed quarterly journal that presents practical, research-based information about building, administering, preserving, assessing, and organizing library collections. The journal offers library professionals of all types crucial guidance in the fast-changing field of collection management, including the latest developments in sharing and providing access to resources, creating digital collections, preserving both traditional and digital library resources, applying technological developments to managing collections, training and developing staff.
期刊最新文献
We May Be Visually or Hearing Impaired, but We Need Access to Visual and Auditory Information Life After Lovelace: A Select Bibliography of Women in Computer Science Selection of Library Materials in the University Libraries of Pakistan: A Survey of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Exploring Collection Development Policies at R1 Research University Libraries Plays or e-Plays? Informing a Theater Collection Strategy Using Student Input
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1