广义极值分布变量的鲁棒logistic回归估计量的比较

Şaban Kızılarslan, Ceren Camkıran
{"title":"广义极值分布变量的鲁棒logistic回归估计量的比较","authors":"Şaban Kızılarslan, Ceren Camkıran","doi":"10.3233/mas-210531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare the performance of robust estimators in the presence of explanatory variables with Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distributions in the logistic regression model. Existence of extreme values in the logistic regression model negatively affects the bias and effectiveness of classical Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimators. For this reason, robust estimators that are less sensitive to extreme values have been developed. Random variables with extreme values may be fit in one of specific distributions. In study, the GEV distribution family was examined and five robust estimators were compared for the Fréchet, Gumbel and Weibull distributions. To the simulation results, the CUBIF estimator is prominent according to both bias and efficiency criteria for small samples. In medium and large samples, while the MALLOWS estimator has the minimum bias, the CUBIF estimator has the best efficiency. The same results apply for different contamination ratios and different scale parameter values of the distributions. Simulation findings were supported by a meteorological real data application.","PeriodicalId":35000,"journal":{"name":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of robust logistic regression estimators for variables with generalized extreme value distributions\",\"authors\":\"Şaban Kızılarslan, Ceren Camkıran\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/mas-210531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to compare the performance of robust estimators in the presence of explanatory variables with Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distributions in the logistic regression model. Existence of extreme values in the logistic regression model negatively affects the bias and effectiveness of classical Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimators. For this reason, robust estimators that are less sensitive to extreme values have been developed. Random variables with extreme values may be fit in one of specific distributions. In study, the GEV distribution family was examined and five robust estimators were compared for the Fréchet, Gumbel and Weibull distributions. To the simulation results, the CUBIF estimator is prominent according to both bias and efficiency criteria for small samples. In medium and large samples, while the MALLOWS estimator has the minimum bias, the CUBIF estimator has the best efficiency. The same results apply for different contamination ratios and different scale parameter values of the distributions. Simulation findings were supported by a meteorological real data application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/mas-210531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/mas-210531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较逻辑回归模型中存在解释变量的稳健估计量与广义极值(GEV)分布的性能。逻辑回归模型中极值的存在对经典最大似然(ML)估计的偏差和有效性产生了负面影响。出于这个原因,已经开发出对极值不太敏感的稳健估计量。具有极值的随机变量可以拟合在一个特定的分布中。在研究中,检验了GEV分布族,并比较了Fréchet、Gumbel和Weibull分布的五个稳健估计量。从仿真结果来看,对于小样本,CUBIF估计器在偏差和效率准则方面都很突出。在中样本和大样本中,MALLOWS估计器的偏差最小,而CUBIF估计器具有最佳的效率。相同的结果适用于不同的污染率和分布的不同尺度参数值。模拟结果得到了气象实际数据应用程序的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of robust logistic regression estimators for variables with generalized extreme value distributions
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of robust estimators in the presence of explanatory variables with Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distributions in the logistic regression model. Existence of extreme values in the logistic regression model negatively affects the bias and effectiveness of classical Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimators. For this reason, robust estimators that are less sensitive to extreme values have been developed. Random variables with extreme values may be fit in one of specific distributions. In study, the GEV distribution family was examined and five robust estimators were compared for the Fréchet, Gumbel and Weibull distributions. To the simulation results, the CUBIF estimator is prominent according to both bias and efficiency criteria for small samples. In medium and large samples, while the MALLOWS estimator has the minimum bias, the CUBIF estimator has the best efficiency. The same results apply for different contamination ratios and different scale parameter values of the distributions. Simulation findings were supported by a meteorological real data application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications is a peer reviewed international journal. Model Assisted Statistics means an improvement of inference and analysis by use of correlated information, or an underlying theoretical or design model. This might be the design, adjustment, estimation, or analytical phase of statistical project. This information may be survey generated or coming from an independent source. Original papers in the field of sampling theory, econometrics, time-series, design of experiments, and multivariate analysis will be preferred. Papers of both applied and theoretical topics are acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Limitations of the propensity scores approach: A simulation study INAR(1) process with Poisson-transmuted record type exponential innovations Estimation of three-parameter Fréchet distribution for the number of days from drug administration to remission in small sample sizes Analysis of kidney infection data using correlated compound poisson frailty models Parametric analysis and model selection for economic evaluation of survival data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1