从原作中分离出版权作品的标志性虚构对象

Dian Ayu Muthoharoh
{"title":"从原作中分离出版权作品的标志性虚构对象","authors":"Dian Ayu Muthoharoh","doi":"10.18196/JMH.V28I1.11045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright is one of the IPR branches that protect the human’s intellectual work in the field of science, arts, and literature. The film is a creation that is protected by copyright. In a film, there are not only characters that are easy to remember but also specific properties uniquely used by the characters, especially the main character. This property is called an iconic fictional object. This normative juridical legal research will discuss one legal issue, whether an iconic fictional object can be separately protected from the original work. Based on the analysis in this study, an iconic-fictional object is not explicitly stated as work protected by copyright according to Article 40 of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. However, iconic fictional objects fulfil elements of a work entitled to copyright protection: The creative work in the fields of science, art, and literature; Created by the ability, skill or expertise of the creator; and Expressed in real form. Furthermore, The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on DC Comics vs Mark Towle Batmobile case had argued that iconic fictional objects could be separately protected from the original work as long as they meet three conditions: (1) Physical as well as conceptual qualities, (2) Sufficiently delineated, and (3) Especially distinctive and contain some unique elements of expression.","PeriodicalId":53118,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Media Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iconic Fictional Object as Separately Copyrighted Work from the Original Work\",\"authors\":\"Dian Ayu Muthoharoh\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/JMH.V28I1.11045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copyright is one of the IPR branches that protect the human’s intellectual work in the field of science, arts, and literature. The film is a creation that is protected by copyright. In a film, there are not only characters that are easy to remember but also specific properties uniquely used by the characters, especially the main character. This property is called an iconic fictional object. This normative juridical legal research will discuss one legal issue, whether an iconic fictional object can be separately protected from the original work. Based on the analysis in this study, an iconic-fictional object is not explicitly stated as work protected by copyright according to Article 40 of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. However, iconic fictional objects fulfil elements of a work entitled to copyright protection: The creative work in the fields of science, art, and literature; Created by the ability, skill or expertise of the creator; and Expressed in real form. Furthermore, The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on DC Comics vs Mark Towle Batmobile case had argued that iconic fictional objects could be separately protected from the original work as long as they meet three conditions: (1) Physical as well as conceptual qualities, (2) Sufficiently delineated, and (3) Especially distinctive and contain some unique elements of expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V28I1.11045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Media Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V28I1.11045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

版权是保护人类在科学、艺术和文学领域的智力工作的知识产权分支之一。这部电影是受版权保护的作品。在电影中,不仅有易于记忆的角色,还有角色特别是主角独特使用的特定特性。这个财产被称为一个标志性的虚构物体。这项规范性的法律研究将讨论一个法律问题,即一个标志性的虚构对象是否可以与原作分开保护。根据本研究的分析,根据2014年第28号《著作权法》第40条的规定,标志性的虚构物体没有明确规定为受著作权保护的作品。然而,标志性的虚构物体满足了有权获得版权保护的作品的要素:科学、艺术和文学领域的创造性工作;由创造者的能力、技能或专业知识创造的;此外,美国DC漫画诉Mark Towle蝙蝠车案第九巡回上诉法院认为,只要符合三个条件,标志性的虚构物体就可以与原作分开保护:(1)物理和概念品质,(2)充分描绘,和(3)特别独特,并包含一些独特的表达元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Iconic Fictional Object as Separately Copyrighted Work from the Original Work
Copyright is one of the IPR branches that protect the human’s intellectual work in the field of science, arts, and literature. The film is a creation that is protected by copyright. In a film, there are not only characters that are easy to remember but also specific properties uniquely used by the characters, especially the main character. This property is called an iconic fictional object. This normative juridical legal research will discuss one legal issue, whether an iconic fictional object can be separately protected from the original work. Based on the analysis in this study, an iconic-fictional object is not explicitly stated as work protected by copyright according to Article 40 of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. However, iconic fictional objects fulfil elements of a work entitled to copyright protection: The creative work in the fields of science, art, and literature; Created by the ability, skill or expertise of the creator; and Expressed in real form. Furthermore, The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on DC Comics vs Mark Towle Batmobile case had argued that iconic fictional objects could be separately protected from the original work as long as they meet three conditions: (1) Physical as well as conceptual qualities, (2) Sufficiently delineated, and (3) Especially distinctive and contain some unique elements of expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Reintegration after the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Code Kerangka Penyusunan Produk Hukum Daerah Berbasis Pada Kekhususan Dan Keberagaman Daerah Kedudukan Wakil Kepala Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Revitalisasi Hukum Islam Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia Peran Mahasiswa Dalam Mencegah Politik Uang Dan Kecurangan Pemilu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1