“生物学很容易,物理学很难”:学生对STEM高等教育中理想和典型学生的看法

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Studies in Sociology of Education Pub Date : 2022-09-25 DOI:10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532
B. Wong, Y. Chiu, Ó. Murray, Jo Horsburgh, Meggie Copsey-Blake
{"title":"“生物学很容易,物理学很难”:学生对STEM高等教育中理想和典型学生的看法","authors":"B. Wong, Y. Chiu, Ó. Murray, Jo Horsburgh, Meggie Copsey-Blake","doi":"10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper draws upon in-depth interviews with 89 students from two UK universities to explore how students from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) degrees describe the ideal as well as the typical student in their respective disciplines. We provide a comparative insight into the similarities and differences between disciplinary identities based on student perceptions. More specifically, we consider how undergraduates from biology, engineering, mathematics and physics construct the ideal and the typical student in their degree, highlighting the popular discourses and desirable traits that appear to characterise students in these disciplines. In addition to a masculinised construction of students in engineering, mathematics and physics, we found a social hierarchy within STEM degrees where biology was perceived as the easier STEM subject. We conclude with a discussion of the impact of such hierarchies on student identities in STEM, and potential implications for equality, diversity and inclusion.","PeriodicalId":45706,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Biology is easy, physics is hard’: Student perceptions of the ideal and the typical student across STEM higher education\",\"authors\":\"B. Wong, Y. Chiu, Ó. Murray, Jo Horsburgh, Meggie Copsey-Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper draws upon in-depth interviews with 89 students from two UK universities to explore how students from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) degrees describe the ideal as well as the typical student in their respective disciplines. We provide a comparative insight into the similarities and differences between disciplinary identities based on student perceptions. More specifically, we consider how undergraduates from biology, engineering, mathematics and physics construct the ideal and the typical student in their degree, highlighting the popular discourses and desirable traits that appear to characterise students in these disciplines. In addition to a masculinised construction of students in engineering, mathematics and physics, we found a social hierarchy within STEM degrees where biology was perceived as the easier STEM subject. We conclude with a discussion of the impact of such hierarchies on student identities in STEM, and potential implications for equality, diversity and inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Studies in Sociology of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Studies in Sociology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本文对来自英国两所大学的89名学生进行了深入采访,探讨了科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)学位的学生如何描述各自学科中的理想和典型学生。我们根据学生的认知,对学科身份之间的异同进行了比较深入的了解。更具体地说,我们考虑生物学、工程学、数学和物理学的本科生如何构建他们学位中的理想和典型学生,突出这些学科学生的流行话语和可取特征。除了工程、数学和物理专业学生的男性化结构外,我们还发现STEM学位中存在社会等级制度,生物学被认为是更容易的STEM科目。最后,我们讨论了这种等级制度对STEM学生身份的影响,以及对平等、多样性和包容性的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Biology is easy, physics is hard’: Student perceptions of the ideal and the typical student across STEM higher education
ABSTRACT This paper draws upon in-depth interviews with 89 students from two UK universities to explore how students from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) degrees describe the ideal as well as the typical student in their respective disciplines. We provide a comparative insight into the similarities and differences between disciplinary identities based on student perceptions. More specifically, we consider how undergraduates from biology, engineering, mathematics and physics construct the ideal and the typical student in their degree, highlighting the popular discourses and desirable traits that appear to characterise students in these disciplines. In addition to a masculinised construction of students in engineering, mathematics and physics, we found a social hierarchy within STEM degrees where biology was perceived as the easier STEM subject. We conclude with a discussion of the impact of such hierarchies on student identities in STEM, and potential implications for equality, diversity and inclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: International Studies in Sociology of Education is an international journal and publishes papers in the sociology of education which critically engage with theoretical and empirical issues, drawn from as wide a range of perspectives as possible. It aims to move debates forward. The journal is international in outlook and readership and receives papers from around the world. The journal publishes four issues a year; the first three are devoted to a particular theme while the fourth is an "open" issue.
期刊最新文献
Space, education, and inclusion; interdisciplinary approaches (1st edition) Book review symposium on the culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for black youth The Power of the Culture Trap: Highlighting the Importance of Comparative and International Perspectives in Sociology of Education, Derron Wallace, The Culture Trap: Ethnic Expectations & Unequal Schooling for Black Youth: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 296 pp., £19.99 (paperback), £74.00 (hardback), ISBN 978019753146 The culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for Black youth The culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for black youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1