堕胎克什米尔,抹杀克什米尔:印度讲故事和政治审查的轨迹

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian Popular Culture Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14746689.2022.2049515
B. Ohm
{"title":"堕胎克什米尔,抹杀克什米尔:印度讲故事和政治审查的轨迹","authors":"B. Ohm","doi":"10.1080/14746689.2022.2049515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Departing from the extensive internet shutdown (2019–2021) that the Indian government imposed on the annexed state of Jammu and Kashmir, this essay traces a historical trajectory of Kashmir’s invisibilisation in India’s popular imagination. Focusing film and television serial productions from the 1960s onwards, my argument proceeds from the forming of the cinematic master narrative on Kashmir towards the forcefully aborted TV serial Kashmeer (2003). I contend that in order to understand the large public acceptance both of Kashmir’s annexation and its digital closure, we need to engage a more capacious conceptualisation of censorship that captures the variety of its political influences in everyday entertainment and its formative role for audiences. Moving beyond the official interference with imagery and story lines (through the Central Board of Film Certification, CBFB) I examine on the one hand, how the visual framing of Kashmir, and its absence, has been dependent on a structurally, ideologically and economically shifting televisual field that bore interlinked modes of vertical/state and horizontal/populist censorship as well as manipulative corporate intervention. On the other hand, in conjuncture with these conditions, I argue for a stronger consideration of the functional significance, at specific historical moments, of different formats and genres in fictitious storytelling, whose respective logics of production and consumption are themselves carriers of emancipative opening and closure.","PeriodicalId":35199,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Popular Culture","volume":"20 1","pages":"77 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aborting Kashmeer, erasing Kashmir: A trajectory of storytelling and political censorship in India\",\"authors\":\"B. Ohm\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14746689.2022.2049515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Departing from the extensive internet shutdown (2019–2021) that the Indian government imposed on the annexed state of Jammu and Kashmir, this essay traces a historical trajectory of Kashmir’s invisibilisation in India’s popular imagination. Focusing film and television serial productions from the 1960s onwards, my argument proceeds from the forming of the cinematic master narrative on Kashmir towards the forcefully aborted TV serial Kashmeer (2003). I contend that in order to understand the large public acceptance both of Kashmir’s annexation and its digital closure, we need to engage a more capacious conceptualisation of censorship that captures the variety of its political influences in everyday entertainment and its formative role for audiences. Moving beyond the official interference with imagery and story lines (through the Central Board of Film Certification, CBFB) I examine on the one hand, how the visual framing of Kashmir, and its absence, has been dependent on a structurally, ideologically and economically shifting televisual field that bore interlinked modes of vertical/state and horizontal/populist censorship as well as manipulative corporate intervention. On the other hand, in conjuncture with these conditions, I argue for a stronger consideration of the functional significance, at specific historical moments, of different formats and genres in fictitious storytelling, whose respective logics of production and consumption are themselves carriers of emancipative opening and closure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Popular Culture\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Popular Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2022.2049515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Popular Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2022.2049515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从印度政府对被吞并的查谟和克什米尔邦实施的大规模互联网关闭(2019-2021)出发,本文追溯了克什米尔在印度大众想象中被忽视的历史轨迹。聚焦于1960年代以来的电影和电视系列作品,我的论点从形成关于克什米尔的电影大师叙事到强行流产的电视系列《喀什米尔》(2003)。我认为,为了理解公众对克什米尔的吞并和数字封锁的广泛接受,我们需要对审查制度进行更广泛的概念化,以捕捉其在日常娱乐中的各种政治影响及其对观众的形成作用。除了官方对图像和故事情节的干预(通过中央电影认证委员会,CBFB)之外,我一方面考察了克什米尔的视觉框架及其缺失是如何依赖于一个结构上、意识形态上和经济上不断变化的电视领域的,这个领域具有垂直/国家和水平/民粹主义审查以及操纵企业干预的相互关联的模式。另一方面,结合这些条件,我主张在特定的历史时刻,更强烈地考虑不同形式和类型的虚构叙事的功能意义,它们各自的生产和消费逻辑本身就是解放的开放和关闭的载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aborting Kashmeer, erasing Kashmir: A trajectory of storytelling and political censorship in India
ABSTRACT Departing from the extensive internet shutdown (2019–2021) that the Indian government imposed on the annexed state of Jammu and Kashmir, this essay traces a historical trajectory of Kashmir’s invisibilisation in India’s popular imagination. Focusing film and television serial productions from the 1960s onwards, my argument proceeds from the forming of the cinematic master narrative on Kashmir towards the forcefully aborted TV serial Kashmeer (2003). I contend that in order to understand the large public acceptance both of Kashmir’s annexation and its digital closure, we need to engage a more capacious conceptualisation of censorship that captures the variety of its political influences in everyday entertainment and its formative role for audiences. Moving beyond the official interference with imagery and story lines (through the Central Board of Film Certification, CBFB) I examine on the one hand, how the visual framing of Kashmir, and its absence, has been dependent on a structurally, ideologically and economically shifting televisual field that bore interlinked modes of vertical/state and horizontal/populist censorship as well as manipulative corporate intervention. On the other hand, in conjuncture with these conditions, I argue for a stronger consideration of the functional significance, at specific historical moments, of different formats and genres in fictitious storytelling, whose respective logics of production and consumption are themselves carriers of emancipative opening and closure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Popular Culture
South Asian Popular Culture Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Bollywoodizing Netflix or globalizing Hotstar? The cultural-industrial logics of global streaming platforms in India The women of Miranda House: Building archival collections, digital humanities and feminist digital history Digital expression from the shadow states: The in-betweeners in the late-capitalist era The rise of streaming culture: SVOD media and the digital revolution in India Sensory infrastructures of 21st century Delhi: Urban vistas, digital memories and aesthetic imaginaries of a postcolonial media-city
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1