关于记录会议政策的循证建议

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Horizons Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.003
Stephen Carradini , Kristen Getchell , Peter Cardon , Carolin Fleischmann , Jolanta Aritz , James Stapp
{"title":"关于记录会议政策的循证建议","authors":"Stephen Carradini ,&nbsp;Kristen Getchell ,&nbsp;Peter Cardon ,&nbsp;Carolin Fleischmann ,&nbsp;Jolanta Aritz ,&nbsp;James Stapp","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recordings of virtual meetings have become a common part of virtual and hybrid workplace environments. Meeting recordings offer potential benefits (e.g., speedy transcript production, expedited information sharing, searchable information, inclusion of visual and tonal expressions) and drawbacks (e.g., difficulty discussing sensitive issues, employee privacy, limited off-the-record capabilities, and employee concerns over sharing recordings). Given this variance, policies for virtual meetings are a necessity. Managers can successfully implement a policy by cocreating policy preferences with employees in open-ended and nonjudgmental conversations that openly discuss potential benefits, drawbacks, and employee concerns. Topics such as when to record, when not to record, how to gain consent, and who will have administrative and sharing rights should be covered. Areas of less urgency that may yet be part of these discussions include accessibility concerns, the use or rejection of software features, where and for how long meeting recordings should be stored, and such emerging issues as the use of virtual reality and AI tools. Managers should deliver policy preferences to a group of representatives from Human Resources, Information Technology, and the executive team to compose the policy, request a legal review, and to introduce and implement it in the organization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"67 1","pages":"Pages 83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000940/pdfft?md5=f864617fc55182227858d211e76fa852&pid=1-s2.0-S0007681323000940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based recommendations for recorded-meetings policies\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Carradini ,&nbsp;Kristen Getchell ,&nbsp;Peter Cardon ,&nbsp;Carolin Fleischmann ,&nbsp;Jolanta Aritz ,&nbsp;James Stapp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recordings of virtual meetings have become a common part of virtual and hybrid workplace environments. Meeting recordings offer potential benefits (e.g., speedy transcript production, expedited information sharing, searchable information, inclusion of visual and tonal expressions) and drawbacks (e.g., difficulty discussing sensitive issues, employee privacy, limited off-the-record capabilities, and employee concerns over sharing recordings). Given this variance, policies for virtual meetings are a necessity. Managers can successfully implement a policy by cocreating policy preferences with employees in open-ended and nonjudgmental conversations that openly discuss potential benefits, drawbacks, and employee concerns. Topics such as when to record, when not to record, how to gain consent, and who will have administrative and sharing rights should be covered. Areas of less urgency that may yet be part of these discussions include accessibility concerns, the use or rejection of software features, where and for how long meeting recordings should be stored, and such emerging issues as the use of virtual reality and AI tools. Managers should deliver policy preferences to a group of representatives from Human Resources, Information Technology, and the executive team to compose the policy, request a legal review, and to introduce and implement it in the organization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Horizons\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000940/pdfft?md5=f864617fc55182227858d211e76fa852&pid=1-s2.0-S0007681323000940-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681323000940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚拟会议录音已成为虚拟和混合工作环境的常见组成部分。会议录音既有潜在的好处(如快速制作记录誊本、加快信息共享、可搜索信息、包含视觉和音调表达),也有缺点(如难以讨论敏感问题、员工隐私、录音功能有限以及员工对共享录音的担忧)。鉴于这种差异,制定虚拟会议政策是必要的。管理人员可以通过与员工进行开放式、非批判性的对话,公开讨论潜在的好处、弊端和员工的顾虑,共同制定政策偏好,从而成功实施政策。诸如何时记录、何时不记录、如何获得同意以及谁将拥有管理和共享权利等话题都应涵盖在内。不那么紧迫但仍有可能成为讨论内容的领域包括:可访问性问题、软件功能的使用或拒绝、会议录音的存储位置和时间,以及虚拟现实和人工智能工具的使用等新出现的问题。管理人员应将政策偏好提交给由人力资源、信息技术和执行团队的代表组成的小组,以制定政策,要求进行法律审查,并在组织中引入和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based recommendations for recorded-meetings policies

Recordings of virtual meetings have become a common part of virtual and hybrid workplace environments. Meeting recordings offer potential benefits (e.g., speedy transcript production, expedited information sharing, searchable information, inclusion of visual and tonal expressions) and drawbacks (e.g., difficulty discussing sensitive issues, employee privacy, limited off-the-record capabilities, and employee concerns over sharing recordings). Given this variance, policies for virtual meetings are a necessity. Managers can successfully implement a policy by cocreating policy preferences with employees in open-ended and nonjudgmental conversations that openly discuss potential benefits, drawbacks, and employee concerns. Topics such as when to record, when not to record, how to gain consent, and who will have administrative and sharing rights should be covered. Areas of less urgency that may yet be part of these discussions include accessibility concerns, the use or rejection of software features, where and for how long meeting recordings should be stored, and such emerging issues as the use of virtual reality and AI tools. Managers should deliver policy preferences to a group of representatives from Human Resources, Information Technology, and the executive team to compose the policy, request a legal review, and to introduce and implement it in the organization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business Horizons
Business Horizons BUSINESS-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.
期刊最新文献
Inside front cover - ed board CIBER Acknowledgment Business and Peace, Part I: Insights from the first 20 years of B+P scholarship Inside front cover - ed board Peacebuilding by MNE subsidiaries: The role of intangible capital and local initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1