应用人工神经网络预测结直肠癌淋巴血管侵袭

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Precision Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1002/prm2.12074
Dejun Wu, Zhou Yang, Leilei Sun, Yingjun Quan, Zhi-jun Min
{"title":"应用人工神经网络预测结直肠癌淋巴血管侵袭","authors":"Dejun Wu, Zhou Yang, Leilei Sun, Yingjun Quan, Zhi-jun Min","doi":"10.1002/prm2.12074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was considered to be important for metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there was still no effective method to predict LVI before operation. Our research aimed to construct an artificial neural network (ANN) for the preoperative prediction of LVI. We obtained blood indexes and condition of LVI (confirmed by pathological examination) of 288 cases of CRC patients from a tertiary hospital in China. One hundred and eighty‐five CRC patients (training group) were randomly selected to establish neural network and logistic regression models. The remaining 103 cases of CRC patients received the test of ANN and logistic model (validation group). Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess the accuracy of constructed model respectively. All procedures involving human participants were performed by the Shanghai Pudong Hospital ethical committee (2020 No. W2‐007) and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients provided their written informed consent. In the training group, the area under the curve (AUC) of ANN was higher than that of the logistic model (0.832 vs 0.692). The ANN correctly predicted 92% cases of LVI, whereas the logistic model only predicted 56% cases. Similar results were also tested in the validation model. Our constructed ANN showed higher accuracy compared with the conventional linear model. The ANN‐based on blood indexes may provide value for preoperative prediction of LVI.","PeriodicalId":40071,"journal":{"name":"Precision Medical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"62 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion of CRC by artificial neural network\",\"authors\":\"Dejun Wu, Zhou Yang, Leilei Sun, Yingjun Quan, Zhi-jun Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prm2.12074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was considered to be important for metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there was still no effective method to predict LVI before operation. Our research aimed to construct an artificial neural network (ANN) for the preoperative prediction of LVI. We obtained blood indexes and condition of LVI (confirmed by pathological examination) of 288 cases of CRC patients from a tertiary hospital in China. One hundred and eighty‐five CRC patients (training group) were randomly selected to establish neural network and logistic regression models. The remaining 103 cases of CRC patients received the test of ANN and logistic model (validation group). Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess the accuracy of constructed model respectively. All procedures involving human participants were performed by the Shanghai Pudong Hospital ethical committee (2020 No. W2‐007) and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients provided their written informed consent. In the training group, the area under the curve (AUC) of ANN was higher than that of the logistic model (0.832 vs 0.692). The ANN correctly predicted 92% cases of LVI, whereas the logistic model only predicted 56% cases. Similar results were also tested in the validation model. Our constructed ANN showed higher accuracy compared with the conventional linear model. The ANN‐based on blood indexes may provide value for preoperative prediction of LVI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)被认为是癌症(CRC)转移的重要因素。然而,目前还没有有效的方法预测术前LVI。我们的研究旨在构建一种用于LVI术前预测的人工神经网络(ANN)。对我国某三级医院288例结直肠癌患者的血液指标和LVI(经病理证实)情况进行了分析。随机选择185名CRC患者(训练组)建立神经网络和逻辑回归模型。其余103例CRC患者接受了ANN和logistic模型的检验(验证组)。分别进行受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估所构建模型的准确性。所有涉及人类参与者的程序均由上海浦东医院伦理委员会(2020编号W2‐007)执行,并符合1964年《赫尔辛基宣言》及其后来的修正案或类似的伦理标准。所有患者都提供了书面知情同意书。在训练组中,ANN的曲线下面积(AUC)高于logistic模型(0.832vs 0.692)。ANN正确预测了92%的LVI病例,而logistic模型仅预测了56%的病例。在验证模型中也测试了类似的结果。与传统的线性模型相比,我们构建的人工神经网络具有更高的精度。基于血液指标的人工神经网络可能为LVI的术前预测提供价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion of CRC by artificial neural network
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was considered to be important for metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there was still no effective method to predict LVI before operation. Our research aimed to construct an artificial neural network (ANN) for the preoperative prediction of LVI. We obtained blood indexes and condition of LVI (confirmed by pathological examination) of 288 cases of CRC patients from a tertiary hospital in China. One hundred and eighty‐five CRC patients (training group) were randomly selected to establish neural network and logistic regression models. The remaining 103 cases of CRC patients received the test of ANN and logistic model (validation group). Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess the accuracy of constructed model respectively. All procedures involving human participants were performed by the Shanghai Pudong Hospital ethical committee (2020 No. W2‐007) and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients provided their written informed consent. In the training group, the area under the curve (AUC) of ANN was higher than that of the logistic model (0.832 vs 0.692). The ANN correctly predicted 92% cases of LVI, whereas the logistic model only predicted 56% cases. Similar results were also tested in the validation model. Our constructed ANN showed higher accuracy compared with the conventional linear model. The ANN‐based on blood indexes may provide value for preoperative prediction of LVI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Medical Sciences
Precision Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prostatectomy postoperative urinary incontinence: From origin to treatment A case report of adult type 2 familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis Which inflammatory marker might be the best indicator for sacroiliitis? miRNAs involvement in the etiology and targeted therapy of bladder cancer: Interaction between signaling pathway Xiaotan Sanjie Fang prevents colonic inflammation‐related tumorigenesis by inhibiting COX‐2/VEGF expression cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1