STEM课堂中职前教师思想与以学习者为中心方法的关系

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2022.2039344
Stephen C. Scogin, Montserrat Dorantes, Abby Couwenhoven, Josie Vander Kolk, Abbey Schuen, Cara Grimmer, Melissa Porchik, Cameryn Veine, Sara Plohetski, Shelby Bowers
{"title":"STEM课堂中职前教师思想与以学习者为中心方法的关系","authors":"Stephen C. Scogin, Montserrat Dorantes, Abby Couwenhoven, Josie Vander Kolk, Abbey Schuen, Cara Grimmer, Melissa Porchik, Cameryn Veine, Sara Plohetski, Shelby Bowers","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2039344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A generalist teacher is one who has been trained and certified to teach multiple core subjects. As the training and certification of generalists can vary greatly between preparation programs, generalists can enter the profession with conflicting beliefs about how a STEM classroom should be structured and facilitated. As few studies focus on perceptions of generalists in STEM, researchers in the current study sought to understand pre-service teachers’ perceptions of a STEM clinical experience and determine which factors most affected their perceptions. By determining which factors most affected PSTs’ perceptions, researchers hoped to provide suggestions for educator preparation programs so they can better support generalists who end up teaching in STEM classrooms. Researchers interviewed 13 PSTs and 6 in-service teachers and qualitatively analyzed their responses to semi-structured questions. Findings indicated 11 of 13 PSTs devalued the STEM clinical experience, primarily because they were not comfortable with the amount of freedom given to students in the classroom. Two of the 13 PSTs did value the experience, and researchers determined their learner-centered ideologies played a major role. Based on these findings, educator preparation programs can better prepare generalist PSTs for STEM classrooms by: (a) providing more opportunities for generalists to experience authentic STEM classrooms; (b) focusing more on the relationship between ideology and practice; and, (c) creating stronger partnership between preparation programs and K-12 schools.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"181 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Ideologies and Learner-Centered Approaches in STEM Classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Stephen C. Scogin, Montserrat Dorantes, Abby Couwenhoven, Josie Vander Kolk, Abbey Schuen, Cara Grimmer, Melissa Porchik, Cameryn Veine, Sara Plohetski, Shelby Bowers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2039344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A generalist teacher is one who has been trained and certified to teach multiple core subjects. As the training and certification of generalists can vary greatly between preparation programs, generalists can enter the profession with conflicting beliefs about how a STEM classroom should be structured and facilitated. As few studies focus on perceptions of generalists in STEM, researchers in the current study sought to understand pre-service teachers’ perceptions of a STEM clinical experience and determine which factors most affected their perceptions. By determining which factors most affected PSTs’ perceptions, researchers hoped to provide suggestions for educator preparation programs so they can better support generalists who end up teaching in STEM classrooms. Researchers interviewed 13 PSTs and 6 in-service teachers and qualitatively analyzed their responses to semi-structured questions. Findings indicated 11 of 13 PSTs devalued the STEM clinical experience, primarily because they were not comfortable with the amount of freedom given to students in the classroom. Two of the 13 PSTs did value the experience, and researchers determined their learner-centered ideologies played a major role. Based on these findings, educator preparation programs can better prepare generalist PSTs for STEM classrooms by: (a) providing more opportunities for generalists to experience authentic STEM classrooms; (b) focusing more on the relationship between ideology and practice; and, (c) creating stronger partnership between preparation programs and K-12 schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2039344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2039344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通才教师是经过培训和认证可以教授多个核心科目的教师。由于多面手的培训和认证在不同的准备项目之间差异很大,多面手在进入STEM行业时,可能会对如何组织和促进STEM课堂产生相互矛盾的看法。由于很少有研究关注STEM中通才的看法,因此本研究中的研究人员试图了解职前教师对STEM临床经验的看法,并确定哪些因素对他们的看法影响最大。通过确定哪些因素对pst的看法影响最大,研究人员希望为教育工作者准备计划提供建议,以便他们能够更好地支持最终在STEM教室教学的通才。研究人员采访了13名pst和6名在职教师,并定性分析了他们对半结构化问题的回答。研究结果表明,13名pst中有11名贬低了STEM临床经验,主要是因为他们对课堂上给予学生的自由感到不舒服。13名pst中有两名确实重视这一经历,研究人员确定,他们以学习者为中心的意识形态发挥了主要作用。基于这些发现,教育者培训项目可以通过以下方式为多面手提供更多体验真实STEM课堂的机会;(二)更加注重意识形态与实践的关系;(c)在预备课程和K-12学校之间建立更强有力的伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers’ Ideologies and Learner-Centered Approaches in STEM Classrooms
ABSTRACT A generalist teacher is one who has been trained and certified to teach multiple core subjects. As the training and certification of generalists can vary greatly between preparation programs, generalists can enter the profession with conflicting beliefs about how a STEM classroom should be structured and facilitated. As few studies focus on perceptions of generalists in STEM, researchers in the current study sought to understand pre-service teachers’ perceptions of a STEM clinical experience and determine which factors most affected their perceptions. By determining which factors most affected PSTs’ perceptions, researchers hoped to provide suggestions for educator preparation programs so they can better support generalists who end up teaching in STEM classrooms. Researchers interviewed 13 PSTs and 6 in-service teachers and qualitatively analyzed their responses to semi-structured questions. Findings indicated 11 of 13 PSTs devalued the STEM clinical experience, primarily because they were not comfortable with the amount of freedom given to students in the classroom. Two of the 13 PSTs did value the experience, and researchers determined their learner-centered ideologies played a major role. Based on these findings, educator preparation programs can better prepare generalist PSTs for STEM classrooms by: (a) providing more opportunities for generalists to experience authentic STEM classrooms; (b) focusing more on the relationship between ideology and practice; and, (c) creating stronger partnership between preparation programs and K-12 schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1