{"title":"哀悼政治中的歧义","authors":"G. Snyder","doi":"10.3167/dt.2018.050210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does a democratically-productive form of mourning\nlook like in America? David McIvor’s Mourning in America and Simon Stow’s\nAmerican Mourning argue that it entails the embrace of ambivalence about\nself and other. Democratically-productive mourning pushes against the tendencies\ntoward idealization and demonization. Embracing ambivalence enables\nus to move to more effective political engagement in the context of\nboth collaboration and conflict. It allows us to understand that the process\nof mourning must be ongoing both to protect us from political excesses to\nwhich we are prone and to push society toward justice.","PeriodicalId":42255,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/dt.2018.050210","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unambivalent about Ambivalence in the Politics of Mourning\",\"authors\":\"G. Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/dt.2018.050210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What does a democratically-productive form of mourning\\nlook like in America? David McIvor’s Mourning in America and Simon Stow’s\\nAmerican Mourning argue that it entails the embrace of ambivalence about\\nself and other. Democratically-productive mourning pushes against the tendencies\\ntoward idealization and demonization. Embracing ambivalence enables\\nus to move to more effective political engagement in the context of\\nboth collaboration and conflict. It allows us to understand that the process\\nof mourning must be ongoing both to protect us from political excesses to\\nwhich we are prone and to push society toward justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/dt.2018.050210\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unambivalent about Ambivalence in the Politics of Mourning
What does a democratically-productive form of mourning
look like in America? David McIvor’s Mourning in America and Simon Stow’s
American Mourning argue that it entails the embrace of ambivalence about
self and other. Democratically-productive mourning pushes against the tendencies
toward idealization and demonization. Embracing ambivalence enables
us to move to more effective political engagement in the context of
both collaboration and conflict. It allows us to understand that the process
of mourning must be ongoing both to protect us from political excesses to
which we are prone and to push society toward justice.
期刊介绍:
Democratic Theory is a peer-reviewed journal published and distributed by Berghahn. It encourages philosophical and interdisciplinary contributions that critically explore democratic theory—in all its forms. Spanning a range of views, the journal offers a cross-disciplinary forum for diverse theoretical questions to be put forward and systematically examined. It advances non-Western as well as Western ideas and is actively based on the premise that there are many forms of democracies and many types of democrats. As a forum for debate, the journal challenges theorists to ask and answer the perennial questions that plague the field of democratization studies: Why is democracy so prominent in the world today? What is the meaning of democracy? Will democracy continue to expand? Are current forms of democracy sufficient to give voice to “the people” in an increasingly fragmented and divided world? Who leads in democracy? What types of non-Western democratic theories are there? Should democrats always defend democracy? Should democrats be fearful of de-democratization, post-democracies, and the rise of hybridized regimes?