{"title":"变体中的结构图式","authors":"O. Silvennoinen","doi":"10.1075/CF.00009.SIL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses constructional variation in the domain of contrastive\n negation in English, using data from the British National Corpus. Contrastive\n negation refers to constructs with two parts, one negative and the other\n affirmative, such that the affirmative offers an alternative to the negative in\n the frame in question (e.g. shaken, not stirred; not\n once but twice; I don’t like it – I love it). The\n paper utilises multiple correspondence analysis to explore the degree of\n synonymy among the various constructional schemas of contrastive negation,\n finding that different schemas are associated with different semantic, pragmatic\n and extralinguistic contexts but also that certain schemas do not differ from\n each other in a significant way.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructional schemas in variation\",\"authors\":\"O. Silvennoinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/CF.00009.SIL\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper discusses constructional variation in the domain of contrastive\\n negation in English, using data from the British National Corpus. Contrastive\\n negation refers to constructs with two parts, one negative and the other\\n affirmative, such that the affirmative offers an alternative to the negative in\\n the frame in question (e.g. shaken, not stirred; not\\n once but twice; I don’t like it – I love it). The\\n paper utilises multiple correspondence analysis to explore the degree of\\n synonymy among the various constructional schemas of contrastive negation,\\n finding that different schemas are associated with different semantic, pragmatic\\n and extralinguistic contexts but also that certain schemas do not differ from\\n each other in a significant way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00009.SIL\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00009.SIL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper discusses constructional variation in the domain of contrastive
negation in English, using data from the British National Corpus. Contrastive
negation refers to constructs with two parts, one negative and the other
affirmative, such that the affirmative offers an alternative to the negative in
the frame in question (e.g. shaken, not stirred; not
once but twice; I don’t like it – I love it). The
paper utilises multiple correspondence analysis to explore the degree of
synonymy among the various constructional schemas of contrastive negation,
finding that different schemas are associated with different semantic, pragmatic
and extralinguistic contexts but also that certain schemas do not differ from
each other in a significant way.