市场指数期权的分歧

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Econometrics Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1093/jjfinec/nbad017
Guilherme Salomé, George Tauchen, Jia Li
{"title":"市场指数期权的分歧","authors":"Guilherme Salomé, George Tauchen, Jia Li","doi":"10.1093/jjfinec/nbad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We generate new evidence on disagreement among traders in the S&P 500 options market from high-frequency intraday price and volume data. Inference on disagreement is based on a model where investors observe public information but agree to disagree on its interpretation; disagreement among investors is captured by the volume–volatility elasticity. For options, there are two natural variables related to disagreement: moneyness and tenor, which we relate to disagreement about the distribution of the market index at different quantiles and times. The estimated volume–volatility elasticity equals unity for options near the money and close to expiration, which is consistent with the case of no disagreement among investors. In contrast, the elasticity estimates decrease with increases in the absolute value of moneyness, indicating investors have a higher disagreement about rare events. Likewise, the elasticity decreases with increases in tenor, implying higher investors’ disagreement about more distant events.","PeriodicalId":47596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Econometrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disagreement in Market Index Options\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Salomé, George Tauchen, Jia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjfinec/nbad017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We generate new evidence on disagreement among traders in the S&P 500 options market from high-frequency intraday price and volume data. Inference on disagreement is based on a model where investors observe public information but agree to disagree on its interpretation; disagreement among investors is captured by the volume–volatility elasticity. For options, there are two natural variables related to disagreement: moneyness and tenor, which we relate to disagreement about the distribution of the market index at different quantiles and times. The estimated volume–volatility elasticity equals unity for options near the money and close to expiration, which is consistent with the case of no disagreement among investors. In contrast, the elasticity estimates decrease with increases in the absolute value of moneyness, indicating investors have a higher disagreement about rare events. Likewise, the elasticity decreases with increases in tenor, implying higher investors’ disagreement about more distant events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Econometrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbad017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbad017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们从高频盘中价格和交易量数据中得出了标准普尔500指数期权市场交易员之间分歧的新证据。对分歧的推断是基于一个模型,即投资者观察公共信息,但同意对其解释存在分歧;投资者之间的分歧体现在交易量-波动率的弹性上。对于期权,有两个自然变量与分歧有关:货币性和期限,我们将其与市场指数在不同分位数和时间的分布存在分歧有关。估计的数量-波动率弹性等于接近货币和接近到期的期权的统一性,这与投资者之间没有分歧的情况一致。相比之下,弹性估计随着货币绝对价值的增加而减少,这表明投资者对罕见事件的分歧更大。同样,弹性随着期限的增加而降低,这意味着投资者对更遥远的事件的分歧更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disagreement in Market Index Options
We generate new evidence on disagreement among traders in the S&P 500 options market from high-frequency intraday price and volume data. Inference on disagreement is based on a model where investors observe public information but agree to disagree on its interpretation; disagreement among investors is captured by the volume–volatility elasticity. For options, there are two natural variables related to disagreement: moneyness and tenor, which we relate to disagreement about the distribution of the market index at different quantiles and times. The estimated volume–volatility elasticity equals unity for options near the money and close to expiration, which is consistent with the case of no disagreement among investors. In contrast, the elasticity estimates decrease with increases in the absolute value of moneyness, indicating investors have a higher disagreement about rare events. Likewise, the elasticity decreases with increases in tenor, implying higher investors’ disagreement about more distant events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: "The Journal of Financial Econometrics is well situated to become the premier journal in its field. It has started with an excellent first year and I expect many more."
期刊最新文献
Large-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with a High-Frequency-Based Dynamic Factor Model Exploiting Intraday Decompositions in Realized Volatility Forecasting: A Forecast Reconciliation Approach A Structural Break in the Aggregate Earnings–Returns Relation Large Sample Estimators of the Stochastic Discount Factor Jump Clustering, Information Flows, and Stock Price Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1