道歉的时间和类型对假释委员会决策的影响

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302
M. K. Cunius, Monica K. Miller
{"title":"道歉的时间和类型对假释委员会决策的影响","authors":"M. K. Cunius, Monica K. Miller","doi":"10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There are various psychological factors that could impact a parole member’s decision, including whether the prisoner apologizes. This study investigates the effects of an apology’s type and timing on parole members’ release decisions. MTurk participants (N = 460) read vignettes describing a prisoner whose apology differed in its timing (at trial, parole hearing, or both) and type (full, partial). An apology at both the trial and parole hearing is the most effective apology, and a partial parole apology is the least effective apology. This apology also affects the parole member’s perception of the prisoner. Further, male participants (compared to female participants) are more empathetic toward, more likely to feel sorry for, and more likely to perceive similarities with the prisoner. These findings can help the legal system understand how apologies affect parole members’ decisions, and how to create laws that can systematically allow apologies to be considered in parole releases.","PeriodicalId":45877,"journal":{"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of an apology’s timing and type on parole board decision-making\",\"authors\":\"M. K. Cunius, Monica K. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There are various psychological factors that could impact a parole member’s decision, including whether the prisoner apologizes. This study investigates the effects of an apology’s type and timing on parole members’ release decisions. MTurk participants (N = 460) read vignettes describing a prisoner whose apology differed in its timing (at trial, parole hearing, or both) and type (full, partial). An apology at both the trial and parole hearing is the most effective apology, and a partial parole apology is the least effective apology. This apology also affects the parole member’s perception of the prisoner. Further, male participants (compared to female participants) are more empathetic toward, more likely to feel sorry for, and more likely to perceive similarities with the prisoner. These findings can help the legal system understand how apologies affect parole members’ decisions, and how to create laws that can systematically allow apologies to be considered in parole releases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要影响假释委员做出决定的心理因素多种多样,其中包括被假释人是否道歉。本研究探讨了道歉的类型和时间对假释成员释放决定的影响。MTurk的参与者(N = 460)阅读了一段小短文,描述了一名囚犯道歉的时间(审判时,假释听证会上,或两者都有)和类型(完整的,部分的)不同。在审判和假释听证会上道歉是最有效的道歉,而部分假释道歉是最无效的道歉。这种道歉也会影响假释委员对囚犯的看法。此外,男性参与者(与女性参与者相比)对囚犯更有同情心,更有可能感到遗憾,更有可能感受到与囚犯的相似之处。这些发现可以帮助法律系统理解道歉如何影响假释成员的决定,以及如何制定法律,系统地允许在假释中考虑道歉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of an apology’s timing and type on parole board decision-making
ABSTRACT There are various psychological factors that could impact a parole member’s decision, including whether the prisoner apologizes. This study investigates the effects of an apology’s type and timing on parole members’ release decisions. MTurk participants (N = 460) read vignettes describing a prisoner whose apology differed in its timing (at trial, parole hearing, or both) and type (full, partial). An apology at both the trial and parole hearing is the most effective apology, and a partial parole apology is the least effective apology. This apology also affects the parole member’s perception of the prisoner. Further, male participants (compared to female participants) are more empathetic toward, more likely to feel sorry for, and more likely to perceive similarities with the prisoner. These findings can help the legal system understand how apologies affect parole members’ decisions, and how to create laws that can systematically allow apologies to be considered in parole releases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES
CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDIES OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice Studies, a quarterly refereed journal, publishes articles that deal with substantive criminal justice and criminological issues. The journal welcomes all articles that are relevant to the issue of criminal justice, as well as those that may be outside the field but have relevancy to the topic of criminal justice. Articles that cover public administration, issues of public policy, as well as public affairs issues are welcome. The journal also publishes relevant literature reviews, research notes and summary reports of innovative research projects in criminal justice. Qualitative and quantifiable articles are sought mainly from academics and researchers in the field, though articles from professionals will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Research note: examining the connection of organizational citizenship behaviors with supervisor and management trust among correctional staff Courtroom decorum and the rules of conduct: accounts of homicide co-victims’ experiences during criminal justice proceedings Per imaginem ad Veritatem: joint fantasizing of Crime The effects of public service motivation on criminal justice students’ perceptions of vocational fit Understanding the decline: a procedural justice approach to the key factors behind the downward shift in opinions of police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1